This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Mrs. Lorraine Chapot
Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK

Basic Info


Research Keywords & Expertise

0 Epidemiology
0 Infectious Diseases
0 Veterinary Medicine
0 One Health
0 zoonosis

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Journal article
Published: 23 August 2021 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Food systems are increasingly under threat, with climate, biological, economic or policy shocks and stressors occurring at an increasing frequency and scale. Their complex and fragile nature has become even more apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review of news articles published globally between December 2019 and April 2020 was conducted to describe the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the chicken meat system and to identify key vulnerabilities and intervention points to build resilience. Most of the impacts identified were caused by a combination of the different mitigation measures implemented by the system actors such as movement restrictions rather than by the direct effects of the virus, thereby demonstrating the importance of interconnections and coordination in the system. Social media were found to have played a crucial role in amplifying, mitigating or mediating the impact of the pandemic. The findings highlight the importance of adopting a holistic approach that integrates the multiple dimensions of food systems for effective responses to systemic shocks.

ACS Style

Lorraine Chapot; Louise Whatford; Polly Compston; Mehroosh Tak; Soledad Cuevas; Maria Garza; Houda Bennani; Hassaan Bin Aslam; Mathew Hennessey; Georgina Limon; Kevin Queenan; Guillaume Fournié; Nikolaos Dadios; Barbara Häsler. A Global Media Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chicken Meat Food Systems: Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities for Building Resilience. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9435 .

AMA Style

Lorraine Chapot, Louise Whatford, Polly Compston, Mehroosh Tak, Soledad Cuevas, Maria Garza, Houda Bennani, Hassaan Bin Aslam, Mathew Hennessey, Georgina Limon, Kevin Queenan, Guillaume Fournié, Nikolaos Dadios, Barbara Häsler. A Global Media Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chicken Meat Food Systems: Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities for Building Resilience. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (16):9435.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lorraine Chapot; Louise Whatford; Polly Compston; Mehroosh Tak; Soledad Cuevas; Maria Garza; Houda Bennani; Hassaan Bin Aslam; Mathew Hennessey; Georgina Limon; Kevin Queenan; Guillaume Fournié; Nikolaos Dadios; Barbara Häsler. 2021. "A Global Media Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chicken Meat Food Systems: Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities for Building Resilience." Sustainability 13, no. 16: 9435.

Journal article
Published: 22 March 2021 in Antibiotics
Reads 0
Downloads 0

The use of antibiotics in animals for both therapeutic and non-therapeutic purposes is a major driver of the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). While several studies have investigated prescription and consumption patterns in humans, little attention has been paid to the veterinary sector. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 3002 veterinary students (VS) and non-medical students (NMS) from 12 universities in Bangladesh to explore their knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) about antibiotics and AMR using a self-administered questionnaire, and assess the influence of the veterinary curriculum. KAP regarding antibiotic use and AMR was significantly higher in veterinary than non-medical students, and in first-year than final-year students. However, gaps in knowledge and practices were highlighted, suggesting deficiencies in training. Moreover, final-year veterinary students were found to be more likely than first-year students to use antibiotics without instructions, which could indicate deficiencies in their curriculum. Although the study suggested a positive impact of the veterinary curriculum on KAP about antibiotics and AMR in Bangladesh, critical gaps remain that are likely to contribute to inadequate use in their future practice. Therefore, there is scope for improving educational programs on AMR in professional curricula.

ACS Style

Lorraine Chapot; Samun Sarker; Ruhena Begum; Delower Hossain; Rahima Akter; Mehedi Hasan; Zamila Bupasha; Bayzid; Salauddin; Shafiullah Parvej; Ahm Uddin; Fazlul Hoque; Joya Chowdhury; Niyamat Ullah; Kaisar Rahman; Nure Siddiky; Guillaume Fournié; Mohammed Samad. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Antibiotic Use and Resistance among Veterinary Students in Bangladesh. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 332 .

AMA Style

Lorraine Chapot, Samun Sarker, Ruhena Begum, Delower Hossain, Rahima Akter, Mehedi Hasan, Zamila Bupasha, Bayzid, Salauddin, Shafiullah Parvej, Ahm Uddin, Fazlul Hoque, Joya Chowdhury, Niyamat Ullah, Kaisar Rahman, Nure Siddiky, Guillaume Fournié, Mohammed Samad. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Antibiotic Use and Resistance among Veterinary Students in Bangladesh. Antibiotics. 2021; 10 (3):332.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lorraine Chapot; Samun Sarker; Ruhena Begum; Delower Hossain; Rahima Akter; Mehedi Hasan; Zamila Bupasha; Bayzid; Salauddin; Shafiullah Parvej; Ahm Uddin; Fazlul Hoque; Joya Chowdhury; Niyamat Ullah; Kaisar Rahman; Nure Siddiky; Guillaume Fournié; Mohammed Samad. 2021. "Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Antibiotic Use and Resistance among Veterinary Students in Bangladesh." Antibiotics 10, no. 3: 332.

Journal article
Published: 01 May 2020 in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Dengue is a growing problem in Hanoi, with cyclical epidemics of increasing frequency and magnitude. In June 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional survey using mixed methods to investigate how inhabitants of Hanoi perceive and respond to the risk of mosquito-borne diseases (MBD). A total of 117 participants recruited using a stratified random sampling method were interviewed in three districts of Hanoi. Knowledge and practices (KP) regarding MBDs were assessed using a pre-tested questionnaire. Inferential statistics were used to identify factors associated with KP scores and describe the relationship between variables. Additionally, a “risk-mapping” exercise was conducted in a subsample through semi-structured interviews and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using the System Effects platform. Factors significantly associated with knowledge scores were education and family history of MBDs. While knowledge and practice scores were found to be positively correlated in the statistical analysis, this was not corroborated by our observations on the field. The results also revealed gaps in knowledge about MBDs and vectors and highlighted a general feeling of powerlessness which prevented the adoption of protective behaviors. Therefore, educational interventions which provide concrete tools to empower communities should have a positive impact on improving vector control.

ACS Style

Lorraine Chapot; Thang Nguyen-Tien; Long Pham-Thanh; Hung Nguyen-Viet; Luke Craven; Johanna F Lindahl. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Knowledge of Mosquito-Borne Infections and Barriers for Protection in Hanoi, Vietnam. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 2020, 5, 1 .

AMA Style

Lorraine Chapot, Thang Nguyen-Tien, Long Pham-Thanh, Hung Nguyen-Viet, Luke Craven, Johanna F Lindahl. A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Knowledge of Mosquito-Borne Infections and Barriers for Protection in Hanoi, Vietnam. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2020; 5 (2):1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lorraine Chapot; Thang Nguyen-Tien; Long Pham-Thanh; Hung Nguyen-Viet; Luke Craven; Johanna F Lindahl. 2020. "A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Knowledge of Mosquito-Borne Infections and Barriers for Protection in Hanoi, Vietnam." Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 5, no. 2: 1.