Julie Bellière

Dr. Julie Bellière


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YRYves Renaudineau
Yves Renaudineau
WBWesley Brooks
Wesley Brooks
JBJulie Bellière
Julie Bellière
Lupus nephritis (LN) represents the most severe organ manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in terms of morbidity and mortality. To reduce these risks, tremendous efforts have been made in the last decade to characterize the different steps of the disease and to develop biomarkers in order to better (i) unravel the pre-SLE stage (e.g., anti-nuclear antibodies and interferon signature); (ii) more timely initiation of therapy by improving early and accurate LN diagnosis (e.g., pathologic classification was revised); (iii) monitor disease activity and therapeutic response (e.g., recommendation to re-biopsy, new urinary biomarkers); (iv) prevent disease flares (e.g., serologic and urinary biomarkers); (v) mitigate the deterioration in the renal function; and (vi) reduce side effects with new therapeutic guidelines and novel therapies. However, progress is poor in terms of improvement with early death attributed to active SLE or infections, while later deaths are related to the chronicity of the disease and the use of toxic therapies. Consequently, an individualized treat-to-target strategy is mandatory, and for that, there is an unmet need to develop a set of accurate biomarkers to be used as the standard of care and adapted to each stage of the disease.

30 January 2022 in Kidney International Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CGCharlotte Gabilan
Charlotte Gabilan
PPPierre Pfirmann
Pierre Pfirmann
DRDavid Ribes
David Ribes
CRClaire Rigothier
Claire Rigothier
DCDominique Chauveau
Dominique Chauveau
JBJulie Bellière
Julie Bellière

7 June 2023 in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAnis Chaba
Anis Chaba
ADArnaud Devresse
Arnaud Devresse
VAVincent AUDARD
Vincent AUDARD
JBJean Jacques Boffa
Jean Jacques Boffa
AKAlexandre Karras
Alexandre Karras
MZMohamad Zaidan
Mohamad Zaidan
Background: IgG4-related kidney disease is a major manifestation of IgG4-related disease, a systemic fibroinflammatory disorder. However, the clinical and prognostic kidney-related factors in patients with IgG4-related kidney disease are insufficiently defined. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study using data from 35 sites in two European countries. Clinical, biologic, imaging, and histopathologic data; treatment modalities; and outcomes were collected from medical records. Logistic regression was performed to identify the possible factors related to an eGFR ≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at the last follow-up. Cox proportional hazards model was performed to assess the factors associated with the risk of relapse. Results: We studied 101 adult patients with IgG4-related disease with a median follow-up of 24 (11–58) months. Of these, 87 (86%) patients were male, and the median age was 68 (57–76) years. Eighty-three (82%) patients had IgG4-related kidney disease confirmed by kidney biopsy, with all biopsies showing tubulointerstitial involvement and 16 showing glomerular lesions. Ninety (89%) patients were treated with corticosteroids, and 18 (18%) patients received rituximab as first-line therapy. At the last follow-up, the eGFR was below 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in 32% of patients; 34 (34%) patients experienced a relapse, while 12 (13%) patients had died. By Cox survival analysis, the number of organs involved (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.55) and low C3 and C4 concentrations (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.85) were independently associated with a higher risk of relapse, whereas first-line therapy with rituximab was protective (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.78). At their last follow-up, 19 (19%) patients had an eGFR ≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Age (odd ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.20), peak serum creatinine (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.71 to 5.47), and serum IgG4 level ≥5 g/L (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.23 to 19.40) were independently predictive for severe CKD. Conclusions: IgG4-related kidney disease predominantly affected middle-aged men and manifested as tubulointerstitial nephritis with potential glomerular involvement. Complement consumption and the number of organs involved were associated with a higher relapse rate, whereas first-line therapy with rituximab was associated with lower relapse rate. Patients with high serum IgG4 concentrations (≥5 g/L) had more severe kidney disease.

19 October 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFlorence Abravanel
Florence Abravanel
FNFlorence Nicot
Florence Nicot
SLSébastien Lhomme
Sébastien Lhomme
MCMichele Cazabat
Michele Cazabat
TDThomas Drumel
Thomas Drumel
JIJacques Izopet
Jacques Izopet
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection can lead to a variety of neurological disorders. While HEV RNA is known to be present in the central nervous system, HEV quasispecies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have rarely been explored. We studied the virus’ quasispecies in the blood and the CSF of five patients at the onset of their neurological symptoms. The samples of three patients suffering from meningitis, neuralgic amyotrophy and acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy were taken at the acute phase of the HEV infection. The samples from the other two patients were taken during the chronic phase (5 years after HEV diagnosis) when they presented with clinical signs of encephalitis. We sequenced at least 20 randomly polyproline regions of the selected virus clones. Phylogenetic analysis of the virus variants in the blood and the CSF revealed no virus compartmentalization for the three acute-phase patients but there was clear evidence of HEV quasispecies compartmentalization in the CSF of the two patients during chronic infection. In conclusion, prolonged infection in the immunocompromised condition can lead to independent virus replication in the liver and the tissues, producing viruses in CSF.

22 January 2025 in Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCCaroline Carlé
Caroline Carlé
FFFrançoise Fortenfant
Françoise Fortenfant
CBChloé Bost
Chloé Bost
JBJulie Bellière
Julie Bellière
SFStanislas Faguer
Stanislas Faguer
YRYves Renaudineau
Yves Renaudineau
The autoimmune response to chromatin (Chr) or one of the nucleosome components (double stranded (ds)DNA and histones) is typically associated with the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Related autoantibodies (Ab) are heterogeneous and, among them, anti-dsDNA Ab are part of the classification criteria and recommended for monitoring SLE with regards to lupus flares and therapy responses. However, anti-dsDNA Ab biomarker performances are weak; therefore, coupling anti-dsDNA with anti-Chr Ab can be proposed, which is the aim of this study. In this single center study from 2009 to 2024, 269 SLE patients with follow-up information were retrospectively selected from a population of 646 individuals, including 325 SLE patients, who tested positive for anti-dsDNA and/or anti-Chr Ab (Bioplex 2200™). Bio-clinical information during follow-up were assessed at several time points through medical records in order to explore associations between the anti-dsDNA/Chr Ab profile with disease presentation, and anti-dsDNA/Chr Ab fluctuations with disease activity using clinical SLEDAI-2K, flares requiring specific treatment, and the therapeutic response. At inclusion in the follow-up analysis, corresponding to diagnosis (116/269, 43.1 %) or flare (153/269, 56.9 %), SLE patients were subdivided into three serological groups: the double positive dsDNA/Chr group (DP+, 190/269: 70.6 %), followed by the single positive Chr group (SP-C+, 42/269: 15.6 %), and the single positive dsDNA group (SP-D+, 37/269: 13.8 %). The DP + group, which presented important anti-dsDNA/Ab variations during follow-up, was at risk to develop lupus nephritis (56.8 % versus 2.4 % in SP-C+ and 29.7 % in SP-D+ groups, p < 0.04) and serositis (30 % versus 9.5 % in SP-C+ group, p = 0.006). During follow-up, anti-dsDNA and Chr Ab levels in the SP-C+ and SP-D+ groups remained stable over time irrespective of disease activity, flares, and therapeutic response. Regarding the DP + group, disease activity was correlated with both anti-dsDNA (RmCorr = 0.46, p = 1.6x110-91) and anti-Chr (RmCorr = 0.38, p = 2.8x10-60) Ab levels, which can be used to predict flares. Following therapy introduction, Ab reduction occurred in all patients from the DP + group with a more pronounced effect reported in complete responders. coupling anti-dsDNA with anti-Chr Ab detection at disease initiation/flare allows definition of endotypes, which is useful to follow disease activity, predict lupus nephritis/serositis, and anticipate therapeutic response in the DP + group.

20 June 2024 in Journal of Translational Autoimmunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YRYves Renaudineau
Yves Renaudineau
DCDominique Chauveau
Dominique Chauveau
SFStanislas Faguer
Stanislas Faguer
AHAntoine Huart
Antoine Huart
DRDavid Ribes
David Ribes
JBJulie Bellière
Julie Bellière
Lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis and follow-up requires noninvasive biomarkers. Therefore, the added value of coupling the urinary soluble (s)CD163/creatinuria ratio with serological markers was evaluated in a real-world clinical practice. To this end, a monocentric and retrospective study was conducted in 139 SLE patients with biopsy-proven nephritis having an active LN (LN-A, n = 63 with a positive SLEDAI-renal score) or inactive (n = 76), as well as 98 non-renal SLE patients. The urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio outperformed serological markers for predicting LN-A (AUC>0.972; p < 10-4 with a 100 % specificity threshold fixed at 320 ng/mmol), and for monitoring renal activity allowing prediction of impending flares and remissions in follow-up (AUC = 0.789, p < 10-4). LN-A patients with an elevated spot proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (p = 8 × 10-6) and sCD163/creatinuria ratio (p = 10-3) were at risk for developing end-stage kidney disease but sCD163/creatinuria ratio cannot substitute kidney biopsy to discriminate LN-A from other glomerulonephritis. Among serological markers (n = 14), anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies (Abs) (AUC>0.750 versus non-LN patients, and AUC>0.640 versus LN-IR patients) best predicted LN-A, and higher levels were retrieved in class III/IV proliferative LN-A. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio remained the only statistically significant biomarker to predict LN-A (p < 0.001). In conclusion, and as compared to classical serological markers, the urinary sCD163/creatinuria ratio provides an additional parameter for monitoring LN patients.