Florence Abravanel

Dr. Florence Abravanel

University Hospital, Toulouse, Occitanie, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 February 2008 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nassim KamarNassim Kamar
Nassim Kamar
JSJanick Selves
Janick Selves
JMJean-Michel Mansuy
Jean-Michel Mansuy
LOLeila Ouezzani
Leila Ouezzani
JPJean-Marie Péron
Jean-Marie Péron
LRLionel Rostaing
Lionel Rostaing
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is considered an agent responsible for acute hepatitis that does not progress to chronic hepatitis. We identified 14 cases of acute HEV infection in three patients receiving liver transplants, nine receiving kidney transplants, and two receiving kidney and pancreas transplants. All patients were positive for serum HEV RNA. Chronic hepatitis developed in eight patients, as confirmed by persistently elevated aminotransferase levels, serum HEV RNA, and histologic features of chronic hepatitis. The time from transplantation to diagnosis was significantly shorter and the total counts of lymphocytes and of CD2, CD3, and CD4 T cells were significantly lower in patients in whom chronic disease developed.

31 January 2020 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sébastien LhommeSébastien Lhomme
Sébastien Lhomme
FNFlorence Nicot
Florence Nicot
NJNicolas Jeanne
Nicolas Jeanne
CDChloé Dimeglio
Chloé Dimeglio
ARAlain Roulet
Alain Roulet
JIJacques Izopet
Jacques Izopet
Recombinant strains of hepatitis E virus (HEV) with insertions of human genomic fragments or HEV sequence duplications in the sequence encoding the polyproline region (PPR) were previously described in chronically infected patients. Such genomic rearrangements confer a replicative advantage in vitro but little is known about their frequency, location, or origin. As the sequences of only a few virus genomes are available, we analyzed the complete genomes of 114 HEV genotype 3 strains from immunocompromised (n = 85) and immunocompetent (n = 29) patients using the single molecular real-time sequencing method to determine the frequency, location, and origin of inserted genomic fragments, plus the proportions of variants with genomic rearrangements in each virus quasispecies. We also examined the amino acid compositions and post-translational modifications conferred by these rearrangements by comparing them to sequences without human gene insertions or HEV gene duplications. We found genomic rearrangements in 7/114 (6.1%) complete genome sequences (4 HEV-3f, 1 HEV-3e, 1 HEV-3 h, and 1 HEV-3chi-new), all from immunocompromised patients, and 3/7 were found at the acute phase of infection. Six of the seven patients harbored virus-host recombinant variants, including one patient with two different recombinant variants. We also detected three recombinant variants with genome duplications of the PPR or PPR + X domains in a single patient. All the genomic rearrangements (seven human fragment insertions of varying origins and three HEV genome duplications) occurred in the PPR. The sequences with genomic rearrangements had specific characteristics: increased net load (p < 0.001) and more ubiquitination (p < 0.001), phosphorylation (p < 0.001), and acetylation (p < 0.001) sites. The human fragment insertions and HEV genome duplications had slightly different characteristics. We believe this is the first description of HEV strains with genomic rearrangements in patients at the acute phase of infection; perhaps these strains are directly transmitted. Clearly, genomic rearrangements produce a greater net load with duplications and insertions having different features. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms by which such modifications influence HEV replication.

1 June 2012 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nassim KamarNassim Kamar
Nassim Kamar
RBRichard Bendall
Richard Bendall
FAFlorence Abravanel
Florence Abravanel
NXNingshao Xia
Ningshao Xia
SISamreen Ijaz
Samreen Ijaz
HDHarry Dalton
Harry Dalton

12 August 2021 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nassim KamarNassim Kamar
Nassim Kamar
FAFlorence Abravanel
Florence Abravanel
OMOlivier Marion
Olivier Marion
CCChloé Couat
Chloé Couat
JIJacques Izopet
Jacques Izopet
ABArnaud Del Bello
Arnaud Del Bello
A weak immune response to two doses of vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been observed in recipients of solid-organ transplants.1,2 Severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have also been reported in transplant recipients who had received two doses of vaccine.3 These reports prompted the French National Authority for Health to recommend the use of a third dose in immunosuppressed patients.4 Here, we report the humoral response in a group of 101 consecutive solid-organ transplant recipients (mean [±SD] age, 58±2 years; 69% were men) who were given three doses of the messenger RNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech). The group included 78 kidney-transplant recipients, 12 liver-transplant recipients, 8 lung-transplant or heart-transplant recipients, and 3 pancreas-transplant recipients. The first two doses were given 1 month apart, and the third dose was administered 61±1 days after the second dose. The time between transplantation and the initiation of vaccination was 97±8 months. Immunosuppression was due to the use of glucocorticoids (in 87% of patients), calcineurin inhibitors (in 79% of patients), mycophenolic acid (in 63% of patients), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (in 30% of patients), and belatacept (in 12% of patients). The levels of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were assessed in all the patients with the use of the Wantai enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise).5 Antibody titers are expressed as the ratio of the sample signal to a calibrator-assigned cutoff signal (the signal-to-cutoff ratio). According to French law, because this was an anonymous retrospective study, institutional review board approval was not required.

1 January 2014 in Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nassim KamarNassim Kamar
Nassim Kamar
HDHarry Dalton
Harry Dalton
FAFlorence Abravanel
Florence Abravanel
JIJacques Izopet
Jacques Izopet
SUMMARY: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a worldwide disease. An improved understanding of the natural history of HEV infection has been achieved within the last decade. Several reservoirs and transmission modes have been identified. Hepatitis E is an underdiagnosed disease, in part due to the use of serological assays with low sensitivity. However, diagnostic tools, including nucleic acid-based tests, have been improved. The epidemiology and clinical features of hepatitis E differ between developing and developed countries. HEV infection is usually an acute self-limiting disease, but in developed countries it causes chronic infection with rapidly progressive cirrhosis in organ transplant recipients, patients with hematological malignancy requiring chemotherapy, and individuals with HIV. HEV also causes extrahepatic manifestations, including a number of neurological syndromes and renal injury. Acute infection usually requires no treatment, but chronic infection should be treated by reducing immunosuppression in transplant patients and/or the use of antiviral therapy. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current knowledge about the virus itself, as well as the epidemiology, diagnostics, natural history, and management of HEV infection in developing and developed countries.

20 March 2014 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nassim KamarNassim Kamar
Nassim Kamar
JIJacques Izopet
Jacques Izopet
STSimona Tripon
Simona Tripon
MBMichael Bismuth
Michael Bismuth
SHSophie Hillaire
Sophie Hillaire
VMVincent Mallet
Vincent Mallet
There is no established therapy for hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter case series was to assess the effects of ribavirin as monotherapy for solid-organ transplant recipients with prolonged HEV viremia. We examined the records of 59 patients who had received a solid-organ transplant (37 kidney-transplant recipients, 10 liver-transplant recipients, 5 heart-transplant recipients, 5 kidney and pancreas–transplant recipients, and 2 lung-transplant recipients). Ribavirin therapy was initiated a median of 9 months (range, 1 to 82) after the diagnosis of HEV infection at a median dose of 600 mg per day (range, 29 to 1200), which was equivalent to 8.1 mg per kilogram of body weight per day (range, 0.6 to 16.3). Patients received ribavirin for a median of 3 months (range, 1 to 18); 66% of the patients received ribavirin for 3 months or less. All the patients had HEV viremia when ribavirin was initiated (all 54 in whom genotyping was performed had HEV genotype 3). At the end of therapy, HEV clearance was observed in 95% of the patients. A recurrence of HEV replication occurred in 10 patients after ribavirin was stopped. A sustained virologic response, defined as an undetectable serum HEV RNA level at least 6 months after cessation of ribavirin therapy, occurred in 46 of the 59 patients (78%). A sustained virologic response was also observed in 4 patients who had a recurrence and were re-treated for a longer period. A higher lymphocyte count when ribavirin therapy was initiated was associated with a greater likelihood of a sustained virologic response. Anemia was the main identified side effect and required a reduction in ribavirin dose in 29% of the patients, the use of erythropoietin in 54%, and blood transfusions in 12%. This retrospective, multicenter study showed that ribavirin as monotherapy may be effective in the treatment of chronic HEV infection; a 3-month course seemed to be an appropriate duration of therapy for most patients.