In line with the low-carbon strategy, the EU is expected to be climate-neutral by 2050, which would require a significant increase in renewable energy production. Produced biogas is directly used to produce electricity and heat, or it can be upgraded to reach the “renewable natural gas”, i.e., biomethane. This paper reviews the applied production technology and current state of biogas and biomethane production in Europe. Germany, UK, Italy and France are the leaders in biogas production in Europe. Biogas from AD processes is most represented in total biogas production (84%). Germany is deserving for the majority (52%) of AD biogas in the EU, while landfill gas production is well represented in the UK (43%). Biogas from sewage sludge is poorly presented by less than 5% in total biogas quantities produced in the EU. Biomethane facilities will reach a production of 32 TWh in 2020 in Europe. There are currently 18 countries producing biomethane (Germany and France with highest share). Most of the European plants use agricultural substrate (28%), while the second position refers to energy crop feedstock (25%). Sewage sludge facilities participate with 14% in the EU, mostly applied in Sweden. Membrane separation is the most used upgrading technology, applied at around 35% of biomethane plants. High energy prices today, and even higher in the future, give space for the wider acceptance of biomethane use.

Hydraulic fracturing operations are performed to enhance well performance and to achieve economic success from improved production rates and the ultimate reserve recovery. To achieve these goals, fracturing fluid is pumped into the well at rates and pressures that result in the creation of a hydraulic fracture. Fracturing fluid selection presents the main requirement for the successful performance of hydraulic fracturing. The selected fracturing fluid should create a fracture with sufficient width and length for proppant placement and should carry the proppant from the surface to the created fracture. To accomplish all those demands, additives are added in fluids to adjust their properties. This paper describes the classification of fracturing fluids, additives for the adjustment of fluid properties and the requirements for fluid selection. Furthermore, laboratory tests of fracturing fluid, fracture stimulation design steps are presented in the paper, as well as a few examples of fracturing fluids used in Croatia with case studies and finally, hydraulic fracturing performance and post-frac well production results. The total gas production was increased by 43% and condensate production by 106% in selected wells including wellhead pressure, which allowed for a longer production well life.

Pipeline spills and pollution of the environment by crude oil pose a threat to natural resources, especially soil and water. One such incident occurred on 25 September 2018 in the area of Budrovac (Croatia; 46°00′14.6″ N 17°04′16.8″ E) on agricultural land as a pipeline spill. Bioremediation of the contaminated soil was carried out with organic pollutants using an environmentally safe absorbent Spill-Sorb (Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss) and a mineral fertilizer—nitrogen. The experiment was conducted in the greenhouse of the Faculty of Agriculture, Croatia, during a six-month (October 2018–April 2019) study. Samples of agricultural soils contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were taken after the rupture of the local gas condensate pipeline. The experiment was conducted in five treatments in triplicate: I-control (clean soil); II-100% contaminated soil + organic absorbent + nitrogen; III-100% contaminated soil + organic absorbent; IV-50% clean soil + 50% contaminated soil + organic absorbent + nitrogen; and V-50% clean soil + 50% contaminated soil + organic absorbent. The soil properties studied were pH, organic matter content, carbon and nitrogen content and ratio, and changes in the concentration of potential organic contaminants—TPHs and individual PAHs. The results demonstrated that the mixture of organic absorbent and nitrogen efficiently removed organic pollutants from the contaminated soil within six months. However, the application of Spill-Sorb alone was more effective for the degradation of hydrocarbons. The effectiveness of the absorbent studied was dependent on the concentration of organic pollutants and nitrogen application.

The storage of natural gas in geological structures such as depleted fields, aquifers and salt caverns plays an important role in a gas supply system as it balances the fluctuation of gas demand and price. Hydraulic loss due to fluid flow through gas storage production equipment and an interfering effect from nonequal productivity index of storage wells may have an important influence on gas storage performance. An integrated mathematical model is developed based on underground gas storage facility production data. Using this model, the hydraulic loss is determined. A real test case that consists of a gas storage reservoir linked to the surface facility is analysed. The mathematical model uses an experimentally determined pressure drop coefficient in chokes. The base case scenario created using real gas storage facility data enables the achievement of a good history match with the given parameters of the gas storage reservoir. Using the history match simulation case as an initial scenario (a base case), two different scenarios are created to determine the injection and withdrawal performance of the gas storage field. The results indicate that the pressure drop in chokes, when fully open as a constraints in an underground gas storage facility, has a significant impact on gas storage operations and deliverability.

The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) is commonly accepted as a viable technology to convert from low to medium temperature geothermal energy into electrical energy. In practice, the reference technology for converting geothermal energy to electricity is the subcritical simple ORC system. Over time, geothermal ORC plants with more complex configurations (architectures) have been developed. In the open literature, a large number of advanced architectures or configurations have been introduced. An analysis of the scientific literature indicates that there is some confusion regarding the terminology of certain advanced ORC system architectures. A new categorization of advanced configurations has been proposed, with a special emphasis on the application of geothermal energy. The basic division of advanced plant configurations is into dual-pressure and dual-stage ORC systems. In this study, the real potential of advanced ORC architectures or configurations to improve performance as compared with the simple ORC configuration was explored. The research was conducted for a wide range of geothermal heat source temperatures (from 120 °C to 180 °C) and working fluids. Net power output improvements as compared with the basic subcritical simple ORC (SORC) configuration were examined. The ability to produce net power with different ORC configurations depends on the magnitude of the geothermal fluid temperature and the type of working fluid. At a lower value of geothermal fluid temperature (120 °C), the most net power of 18.71 (kW/(kg/s)) was realized by the dual-pressure ORC (DP ORC configuration) with working fluid R1234yf, while the double stage serial-parallel ORC configuration with a low-temperature preheater in a high-temperature stage ORC (DS parHTS LTPH ORC) generated 18.51 (kW/(kg/s)) with the working fluid combination R1234yf/R1234yf. At 140 °C, three ORC configurations achieved similar net power values, namely the simple ORC configuration (SORC), the DP ORC configuration, and the DS parHTS LTPH ORC configuration, which generated 31.03 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234yf, 31.07 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234ze(E), and 30.96 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234ze(E)/R1234yf, respectively. At higher values of geothermal fluid temperatures (160 °C and 180 °C) both the SORC and DP ORC configurations produced the highest net power values, namely 48.58 (kW/(kg/s)) with R1234ze(E), 67.23 (kW/(kg/s)) with isobutene for the SORC configuration, and 50.0 (kW/(kg/s)) with isobutane and 69.67 (kW/(kg/s)) with n-butane for the the DP ORC configuration.