Michele DE MARCO

Dr. Michele DE MARCO


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2021 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHua Sun
Hua Sun
LZLing Zhao
Ling Zhao
ZXZi-Jian Xu
Zi-Jian Xu
MMMichele DE MARCO
Michele DE MARCO
MBMickael Briens
Mickael Briens
Lvhui SunLvhui Sun
Lvhui Sun
This study has determined whether hydroxy-selenomethionine (OH-SeMet) exerts a better protective action on broilers against environmental stress than sodium selenite (SS) or seleno-yeast (SY). Day-old male Cobb 500 broilers (12 cages/diet, 9 broilers/cage) were fed a selenium (Se)-deficient diet (0.047 mg/kg) supplemented with SS, SY or OH-SeMet at 0.3 mg Se/kg under a high stocking density and heat stress condition for six weeks. OH-SeMet improved the FCR and Se concentration in the tissues than SS and SY. SY and OH-SeMet both reduced the serum cortisol, T3, IL-6, IgA, IgM and LPS, more than SS, while only OH-SeMet further increased IL-10 and IgG. SY and OH-SeMet improved the intestinal morphology and increased the T-AOC, TXRND, SELENON and OCCLUDIN activities but decreased CLAUDIN2 in the jejunum than SS, while OH-SeMet further improved these values than SY. SY and OH-SeMet both increased SELENOS and TXNRD2 in the muscles than SS, and OH-SeMet further raised T-AOC, GPX4, SELENOP, SELENOW and TXNRD1, and reduced malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl in the muscles than SS and SY. OH-SeMet showed a better ability to maintain the performance and the redox and immune status of broilers under a high stocking density and heat stress challenge than SS and SY.

13 April 2021 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSilvia Grossi
Silvia Grossi
Luciana RossiLuciana Rossi
Luciana Rossi
MMMichele DE MARCO
Michele DE MARCO
CRCarlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi
Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi
The aim of the study was to compare the effects of sodium selenite (SS), selenium yeast (SY), and hydroxy-selenomethionine (OH-SeMet) on the meat quality and selenium (Se) deposition of finishing beef cattle. Sixty-three bulls were distributed over 3 treatments and fed SS, SY, or OH-SeMet at 0.2 mg kg−1 dry matter (DM) for 60 d. None of the Se sources affected the growth performance or carcass characteristics. OH-SeMet showed a higher Se transfer to the meat than SS or SY (p < 0.01). SY and OH-SeMet reduced the shear force of the meat (p < 0.0001), improved pH (p < 0.001), and reduced the drip losses (p < 0.001) and the lipid oxidation of the meat (p < 0.001). During 8 d of storage, OH-SeMet showed higher levels of meat lightness (L*) and yellowness (b*) than SS (p < 0.001), while the SY meat showed a higher L* than SS, albeit only on d 6. OH-SeMet improved b*, compared to SS, and also compared to SY on days 4, 7, and 8 (p < 0.001). Supplementing beef with SY and OH-SeMet improved several meat quality parameters. OH-SeMet appears to be the most effective strategy to improve the Se content and color stability of beef cattle meat.

1 January 2021 in Italian Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMichele DE MARCO
Michele DE MARCO
ACAnne-Sophie Conjat
Anne-Sophie Conjat
MBMickaël Briens
Mickaël Briens
MHMohammed Amine Hachemi
Mohammed Amine Hachemi
PGPierre-André Geraert
Pierre-André Geraert
This study is aimed at comparing the bio-efficacy of different inorganic and organic Se compounds. Three broiler experiments (Exp1 = Ross PM3; Exp2 = Ross 308; and Exp3 = Ross 308) were performed, on the basis of Se tissue accretion, to define the bio-efficacy of Se sources. Birds were fed a control diet (negative control [NC]; no supplemental Se) and, depending on the study, the NC was supplemented with sodium selenite (SS), Se-yeast (35%, 56%, 65% or 72% of Se as selenomethionine (SeMet); SY35, SY56, SY65 and SY72), pure forms of selenocysteine (SeCys) (methylselenocysteine [MSeCys]; L-selenocystine [L-SeCys]), or pure form of organic Se (L-selenomethionine, L-SeMet or hydroxy-selenomethionine, OH-SeMet) at 0.3 mg Se/kg. In Exp 2, an additional treatment of SY65 + L-SeCys was also fed, with both sources added at 0.3 mg Se/kg. In Exp3, L-SeMet and OH-SeMet, were supplemented at 0.15, 0.30, 0.45 and 0.60 mg Se/kg. The results of Exp 1 (mg Se/kg muscle DM) were: NC, 0.56; SS, 0.73; MSeCys, 0.68; L-SeCys, 0.70; SY65, 1.52; OH-SeMet, 1.85 (p < .001); Exp 2 were: NC, 0.34; SS, 0.52; SY35, 0.84; SY65, 1.18; SY65 + L-SeCys, 1.22; OH-SeMet: 1.33 (p < .001); Exp 3 were: NC, 0.10; SS, 0.31; SY56, 0.88; SY72, 1.03; L-SeMet, 1.33; OH-SeMet, 1.33 (p < .01). The results of these three studies demonstrate that the bio-efficacy of organic Se supplements for chickens depends upon the proportion of SeMet, while dietary SeCys sources showed similar bio-efficacy as SS. Moreover, these data showed the high bio-efficacy of the pure form of organic Se and the bioequivalence between L-SeMet and OH-SeMet.