Polymeric materials degrade as they react with environmental conditions such as temperature, light, and humidity. Electromagnetic radiation from the Sun’s ultraviolet rays weakens the mechanical properties of polymers, causing them to degrade. This study examined the phenomenon of polymer aging due to exposure to ultraviolet radiation. The study examined three specific objectives, including the key theories explaining ultraviolet (UV) radiation’s impact on polymer decomposition, the underlying testing procedures for determining the aging properties of polymeric materials, and appraising the current technical methods for enhancing the UV resistance of polymers. The study utilized a literature review methodology to understand the aging effect of electromagnetic radiation on polymers. Thus, the study concluded that using additives and UV absorbers on polymers and polymer composites can elongate the lifespan of polymers by shielding them from the aging effects of UV radiation. The findings from the study suggest that thermal conditions contribute to polymer degradation by breaking down their physical and chemical bonds. Thermal oxidative environments accelerate aging due to the presence of UV radiation and temperatures that foster a quicker degradation of plastics.
The increased use of plastics in industrial and agricultural applications has led to high levels of pollution worldwide and is a significant challenge. To address this plastic pollution, conventional methods such as landfills and incineration are used, leading to further challenges such as the generation of greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, increasing interest has been directed to identifying alternative methods to dispose of plastic waste from agriculture. The novelty of the current research arose from the lack of critical reviews on how 3-Dimensional (3D) printing was adopted for recycling plastics, its application in the production of agricultural plastics, and its specific benefits, disadvantages, and limitations in recycling plastics. The review paper offers novel insights regarding the application of 3D printing methods including Fused Particle Fabrication (FPF), Hot Melt Extrusion (HME), and Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) to make filaments from plastics. However, the methods were adopted in local recycling setups where only small quantities of the raw materials were considered. Data was collected using a systematic review involving 39 studies. Findings showed that the application of the 3D printing methods led to the generation of agricultural plastics such as Polylactic Acid (PLA), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE), which were found to have properties comparable to those of virgin plastic, suggesting the viability of 3D printing in managing plastic pollution. However, limitations were also associated with the 3D printing methods; 3D-printed plastics deteriorated rapidly under Ultraviolet (UV) light and are non-biodegradable, posing further risks of plastic pollution. However, UV stabilization helps reduce plastic deterioration, thus increasing longevity and reducing disposal. Future directions emphasize identifying methods to reduce the deterioration of 3D-printed agricultural plastics and increasing their longevity in addition to UV stability.
The boom in the electronics industry has made a variety of credit card-sized computer systems and plenty of accompanying sensing and acting elements widely available, at continuously diminishing cost and size levels. The benefits of this situation for agriculture are not left unexploited and thus, more accurate, efficient and environmentally-friendly systems are making the scene. In this context, there is an increasing interest in affordable, small-scale agricultural robots. A key factor for success is the balanced selection of innovative hardware and software components, among the plethora being available. This work describes exactly the steps for designing, implementing and testing a small autonomous electric vehicle, able to follow the farmer during the harvesting activities and to carry the fruits/vegetables from the plant area to the truck location. Quite inexpensive GPS and IMU units, assisted by hardware-accelerated machine vision, speech recognition and networking techniques can assure the fluent operation of a prototype vehicle exhibiting elementary automatic control functionality. The whole approach also highlights the challenges for achieving a truly working solution and provides directions for future exploitation and improvements.
Inevitably, the rapid growth of the electronics industry and the wide availability of tailored programming tools and support are accelerating the digital transformation of the agricultural sector. The latter transformation seems to foster the hopes for tackling the depletion and degradation of natural resources and increasing productivity in order to cover the needs of Earth’s continuously growing population. Consequently, people getting involved with modern agriculture, from farmers to students, should become familiar with and be able to use and improve the innovative systems making the scene. At this point, the contribution of the STEM educational practices in demystifying new areas, especially in primary and secondary education, is remarkable and thus welcome, but things become quite uncertain when trying to discover efficient practices for higher education, and students of agricultural engineering are not an exception. Indeed, university students are not all newcomers to STEM and ask for real-world experiences that better prepare them for their professional careers. Trying to bridge the gap, this work highlights good practices during the various implementation stages of electric robotic ground vehicles that can serve realistic agricultural tasks. Several innovative parts, such as credit card-sized systems, AI-capable modules, smartphones, GPS, solar panels, and network transceivers are properly combined with electromechanical components and recycled materials to deliver technically and educationally meaningful results.
Modern intelligent robotic systems offer farmers a promising solution to labor shortages caused by socio-economic instability and/or pandemics. Efficient harvesting of delicate fruits is one of the main needs in this area. In this context, this work presents a simple and low-cost improvement of the ability of a servo-electric gripper to adjust its force when picking delicate fruits without damaging them. Specifically, this module utilizes a microcontroller that intercepts the current consumed by the servomotor during the gripping action and properly adjusts its aperture, with respect to the force limits suitable for each type of fruit. Experiments were performed on various objects, from elastic balls to oranges, tomatoes and sweet bell peppers. These experiments revealed that the relationship between current consumption and applied force can be accurately approximated by nonlinear expression equations and verified the good performance of the proposed force limitation technique. Consequently, there is scope for adoption by a wide range of agricultural automation systems.
The increasing demand for agricultural products, intensified by natural resource degradation and the lack of human labor in the agri-food sector, favors the adoption of advanced automated technologies in the entire farm-to-fork chain. Despite skepticism, 3D (three-dimensional) printing is amongst the methods that have drawn increasing attention and encourage expectations for tackling the aforementioned challenges. In this context, the current work has a multiperspective character. Firstly, it sheds light on the recent progress in the 3D printing fabrication area and focuses on laboratory-implemented parts improving the efficiency of typical agricultural processes. These cost-effective solutions vary from covers for damaged electric water pumps and joints for greenhouse structures to adjustable ventilation grilles, automatic irrigation valves and specialized fruit-harvesting grippers. Secondly, it reports on lessons learned, highlighting potential strengths/weaknesses during the fabrication process, assisted by complementary feedback collected via questionnaires from agricultural engineering students, their professors, and farmers. Experiences gained justify the optimism about the capacity of 3D printing to foster agriculture, but there are still concerns about the easiness of the 3D printing process and the ability of the 3D-printed parts to withstand harsh agricultural field conditions. Finally, it indicates future directions for the incorporation of 3D printing in agriculture toward increased sustainability pathways.