Nimit Shah

Dr. Nimit Shah

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
JGJudith Graber
Judith Graber
TBTaylor Black
Taylor Black
NSNimit Shah
Nimit Shah
Alberto J. Caban-MartinezAlberto J. Caban-Martinez
Alberto J. Caban-Martinez
SLShou-En Lu
Shou-En Lu
JBJefferey Burgess
Jefferey Burgess
Background: Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are ubiquitous pollutants associated with adverse health outcomes. High PFAS levels have been demonstrated among career firefighters; less is known about PFAS levels among volunteer firefighters who comprise two-thirds of US firefighters. Methods: Volunteer fire department members completed a survey and provided blood samples. We calculated geometric means and 95% CIs for PFAS reported by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We compared PFAS distribution and levels among non-Hispanic white adult male study participants to those in the 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 NHANES cycles. We assessed associations between PFAS serum levels and years of firefighting controlling demographics and occupation using linear regression. Results: Participant’s average age was 46.6 years (sd. 17.1). Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) was detected in almost half study but <3% of NHANES participants; serum levels of PFDoA, perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were elevated among participants compared with NHANES. Serum levels of both PFDA and PFDoA were positively associated with years of firefighting. Conclusions: Volunteer firefighters may have a different serum profile and levels of PFAS than the general population. Future work in this area should include volunteer firefighters from other geographic locations and assess sources of PFAS exposure.

1 March 2020 in Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMStephen J. Mooney
Stephen J. Mooney
KWKatherine Wheeler-Martin
Katherine Wheeler-Martin
LFLaura M. Fiedler
Laura M. Fiedler
CLCeline M. LaBelle
Celine M. LaBelle
TLTaylor Lampe
Taylor Lampe
CDCharles J. DiMaggio
Charles J. DiMaggio
Background: Assessing aspects of intersections that may affect the risk of pedestrian injury is critical to developing child pedestrian injury prevention strategies, but visiting intersections to inspect them is costly and time-consuming. Several research teams have validated the use of Google Street View to conduct virtual neighborhood audits that remove the need for field teams to conduct in-person audits. Methods: We developed a 38-item virtual audit instrument to assess intersections for pedestrian injury risk and tested it on intersections within 700 m of 26 schools in New York City using the Computer-assisted Neighborhood Visual Assessment System (CANVAS) with Google Street View imagery. Results: Six trained auditors tested this instrument for inter-rater reliability on 111 randomly selected intersections and for test–retest reliability on 264 other intersections. Inter-rater kappa scores ranged from −0.01 to 0.92, with nearly half falling above 0.41, the conventional threshold for moderate agreement. Test–retest kappa scores were slightly higher than but highly correlated with inter-rater scores (Spearman rho = 0.83). Items that were highly reliable included the presence of a pedestrian signal (K = 0.92), presence of an overhead structure such as an elevated train or a highway (K = 0.81), and intersection complexity (K = 0.76). Conclusions: Built environment features of intersections relevant to pedestrian safety can be reliably measured using a virtual audit protocol implemented via CANVAS and Google Street View.

13 January 2020 in Injury Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLauren Gonzalez
Lauren Gonzalez
LJLaura E. Jones
Laura E. Jones
MFMaryanne Fakeh
Maryanne Fakeh
NSNimit Shah
Nimit Shah
JPJoseph A. Panchella
Joseph A. Panchella
Derek G. ShendellDerek G. Shendell
Derek G. Shendell
Background: There is an increasing concern over adolescent concussions in sports due to risks of long-term negative effects. This study analyzed data over three school years on reported concussion incidence rates by season, high school grade levels and gender, and reported symptoms by school nurses versus athletic trainers, from New Jersey student-athlete concussion data available from an online school-based surveillance system. Methods: School nurses and athletic trainers reported 300 concussions within five days from when each occurred over three school years, 2015–2018, in team sports and physical education in New Jersey high schools. Analysis was further conducted on symptoms and number of symptoms reported by school nurses versus school athletic trainers for each documented student-athlete concussion. Estimated concussion incidence rates were calculated using state agency verified school enrollment data. Findings: Concussions most commonly occurred during fall, followed by spring, then winter. Concussion incidence rates ranged from 6.3/1000 (4.99, 7.55) – 9.1/1000 (7.27, 10.98) students over the three school years of the study. Athletic trainers completed 86% of the reports while nurses completed 11% (position or title of 3%, or n = 7, were not disclosed); the values were similar when considering only fall pre-season and regular season sports (88, 10, 2%, respectively). On average, across the three school years, athletic trainers reported about 3.5 symptoms per report while nurses reported 2.7 (values in fall seasons only were 3.7 and 3.1, respectively.) Conclusions: Certified athletic trainers, compared to school nurses, more often completed concussion report forms and reported more symptoms per injured student, perhaps due partly to closer contact and immediate care provided after injury. Additionally, this study had a higher concussion incidence rate during fall sports seasons compared to winter and spring. Future research can further improve our understanding of concussions among adolescent student-athletes to better inform concussion identification, management and recovery protocols.

12 August 2023 in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNimit Shah
Nimit Shah
MSMichael B. Steinberg
Michael B. Steinberg
Alberto J. Caban-MartinezAlberto J. Caban-Martinez
Alberto J. Caban-Martinez
EAElena Austin
Elena Austin
JBJefferey Burgess
Jefferey Burgess
JGJudith M. Graber
Judith M. Graber
Background: Firefighters have a higher risk of melanoma incidence and mortality compared to the general population. In the United States (US), the National Fire Protection Association recommends all firefighters receive annual skin cancer screening through visual skin examination by a clinician. However, there is limited information on skin cancer screening practices among volunteer firefighters who comprise two‐thirds of the US fire service.Methods: This cross‐sectional study of 552 US volunteer firefighters estimated the prevalence of skin cancer screening and evaluated associations with their fire service experience, demographics, sun protection practices, and cancer risk perception.Results: The prevalence of receiving skin cancer screening among volunteer firefighters was 26.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4, 29.8). The odds of being screened for skin cancer, compared to not being screened, were twice as high for firefighters who used sunscreen (odds ratio [OR]: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.73) and who perceived their skin likely to burn with prolonged sun exposure (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.10, 3.00). Older age, some college education, and family history of skin cancer were also positively associated with skin cancer screening. A positive exposure‐response relationship was observed between more monthly firefighting calls and receiving screening. Cancer risk perception was not associated with screening.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first large study to assess skin cancer screening among US volunteer firefighters. Our findings suggest gaps in skin cancer prevention efforts in the volunteer fire service. Additional assessment of skin cancer prevention practices within volunteer fire departments could help address these gaps.

16 May 2019 in Preventing Chronic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJesse J. Plascak
Jesse J. Plascak
ALAdana A. M. Llanos
Adana A. M. Llanos
LCLaxmi B. Chavali
Laxmi B. Chavali
CXCathleen Y. Xing
Cathleen Y. Xing
NSNimit Shah
Nimit Shah
SMStephen J. Mooney
Stephen J. Mooney
Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. PCD provides an open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention.

26 March 2024 in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNimit Shah
Nimit Shah
MSMichael B. Steinberg
Michael B. Steinberg
MCMiriam M. Calkins
Miriam M. Calkins
Alberto J. Caban-MartinezAlberto J. Caban-Martinez
Alberto J. Caban-Martinez
JBJefferey Burgess
Jefferey Burgess
JGJudith M. Graber
Judith M. Graber
Background: Although firefighters have increased risk for colon and prostate cancer, limited information exists on screening practices for these cancers in volunteer firefighters who compose two‐thirds of the US fire service. We estimated the prevalence of colon and prostate cancer screening among volunteer firefighters using eligibility criteria from 4 evidence‐based screening recommendations and evaluated factors influencing screening.Methods: We evaluated colon (n = 569) and prostate (n = 498) cancer screening prevalence in a sample of US volunteer firefighters using eligibility criteria from the US Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF), National Fire Protection Association, American Cancer Society, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. We assessed associations with fire service experience, demographics, and cancer risk perception based on USPSTF guidelines.Results: For those eligible based on USPSTF guidelines, colon and prostate cancer screening prevalence was 51.7% (95% CI: 45.7, 57.8) and 48.8% (95% CI: 40.0, 57.6), respectively. Higher odds of colon and prostate cancer screening were observed with older age and with some college education compared to those with less education. Fire service experience and cancer risk perception were not associated with screening practices.Conclusion: This is the first large study to assess colon and prostate cancer screening among US volunteer firefighters based on different screening guidelines. Our findings suggest gaps in cancer prevention efforts in the US volunteer fire service. Promoting cancer screening education and opportunities for volunteer firefighters by their fire departments, healthcare professionals, and public health practitioners, may help to address the gaps.