Shou-En Lu

Dr. Shou-En Lu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2020 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJuan Liu
Juan Liu
CZCen Zhang
Cen Zhang
HWHao Wu
Hao Wu
XSXiao-Xin Sun
Xiao-Xin Sun
YLYanchen Li
Yanchen Li
ZFZhaohui Feng
Zhaohui Feng
Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH), the first rate-limiting enzyme of serine synthesis, is frequently overexpressed in human cancer. PHGDH overexpression activates serine synthesis to promote cancer progression. Currently, PHGDH regulation in normal cells and cancer is not well understood. Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in Parkinson’s disease, is a tumor suppressor. Parkin expression is frequently downregulated in many types of cancer, and its tumor-suppressive mechanism is poorly defined. Here, we show that PHGDH is a substrate for Parkin-mediated ubiquitination and degradation. Parkin interacted with PHGDH and ubiquitinated PHGDH at lysine 330, leading to PHGDH degradation to suppress serine synthesis. Parkin deficiency in cancer cells stabilized PHGDH and activated serine synthesis to promote cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, which was largely abolished by targeting PHGDH with RNA interference, CRISPR/Cas9 KO, or small-molecule PHGDH inhibitors. Furthermore, Parkin expression was inversely correlated with PHGDH expression in human breast cancer and lung cancer. Our results revealed PHGDH ubiquitination by Parkin as a crucial mechanism for PHGDH regulation that contributes to the tumor-suppressive function of Parkin and identified Parkin downregulation as a critical mechanism underlying PHGDH overexpression in cancer.

JGJudith Graber
Judith Graber
TBTaylor Black
Taylor Black
NSNimit Shah
Nimit Shah
Alberto J. Caban-MartinezAlberto J. Caban-Martinez
Alberto J. Caban-Martinez
SLShou-En Lu
Shou-En Lu
JBJefferey Burgess
Jefferey Burgess
Background: Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are ubiquitous pollutants associated with adverse health outcomes. High PFAS levels have been demonstrated among career firefighters; less is known about PFAS levels among volunteer firefighters who comprise two-thirds of US firefighters. Methods: Volunteer fire department members completed a survey and provided blood samples. We calculated geometric means and 95% CIs for PFAS reported by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We compared PFAS distribution and levels among non-Hispanic white adult male study participants to those in the 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 NHANES cycles. We assessed associations between PFAS serum levels and years of firefighting controlling demographics and occupation using linear regression. Results: Participant’s average age was 46.6 years (sd. 17.1). Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) was detected in almost half study but <3% of NHANES participants; serum levels of PFDoA, perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were elevated among participants compared with NHANES. Serum levels of both PFDA and PFDoA were positively associated with years of firefighting. Conclusions: Volunteer firefighters may have a different serum profile and levels of PFAS than the general population. Future work in this area should include volunteer firefighters from other geographic locations and assess sources of PFAS exposure.

YSYeongkwon Son
Yeongkwon Son
VMVladimir Mishin
Vladimir Mishin
William WelshWilliam Welsh
William Welsh
SLShou-En Lu
Shou-En Lu
JLJeffrey D. Laskin
Jeffrey D. Laskin
QMQingyu Meng
Qingyu Meng
Oxidative stress is one of the key mechanisms linking ambient particulate matter (PM) exposure with various adverse health effects. The oxidative potential of PM has been used to characterize the ability of PM induced oxidative stress. Hydroxyl radical (•OH) is the most destructive radical produced by PM. However, there is currently no high-throughput approach which can rapidly measure PM-induced •OH for a large number of samples with an automated system. This study evaluated four existing molecular probes (disodium terephthalate, 3′-p-(aminophenyl)fluorescein, coumarin-3-carboxylic acid, and sodium benzoate) for their applicability to measure •OH induced by PM in a high-throughput cell-free system using fluorescence techniques, based on both our experiments and on an assessment of the physicochemical properties of the probes reported in the literature. Disodium terephthalate (TPT) was the most applicable molecular probe to measure •OH induced by PM, due to its high solubility, high stability of the corresponding fluorescent product (i.e., 2-hydroxyterephthalic acid), high yield compared with the other molecular probes, and stable fluorescence intensity in a wide range of pH environments. TPT was applied in a high-throughput format to measure PM (NIST 1648a)-induced •OH, in phosphate buffered saline. The formed fluorescent product was measured at designated time points up to 2 h. The fluorescent product of TPT had a detection limit of 17.59 nM. The soluble fraction of PM contributed approximately 76.9% of the •OH induced by total PM, and the soluble metal ions of PM contributed 57.4% of the overall •OH formation. This study provides a promising cost-effective high-throughput method to measure •OH induced by PM on a routine basis.

25 March 2015 in BMC Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChin-Lin Tseng
Chin-Lin Tseng
JLJean-Philippe Lafrance
Jean-Philippe Lafrance
SLShou-En Lu
Shou-En Lu
OSOrysya Soroka
Orysya Soroka
DMDonald R Miller
Donald R Miller
LPLeonard M Pogach
Leonard M Pogach
It is unknown whether variability of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) is a risk factor for dialysis or death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to evaluate variability of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) as a risk factor for dialysis or death to facilitate optimum care among high risk patients. A longitudinal retrospective cohort study of 70,598 Veterans Health Administration veteran patients with diabetes and CKD (stage 3–4) in 2000 with up to 5 years of follow-up. VHA and Medicare files were linked to derive study variables. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate association between time to initial dialysis/death and key independent variables: time-varying eGFR variability (measured by standard deviation (SD)) and eGFR means and slopes while adjusting for prior hospitalizations, and comorbidities. There were 76.7% older than 65 years, 97.5% men, and 81.9% Whites. Patients were largely in early stage 3 (61.2%), followed by late stage 3 (28.9%), and stage 4 (9.9%); 29.1%, 46.8%, and 73.3%, respectively, died or had dialysis during the follow-up. eGFR SDs (median: 5.8, 5.1, and 4.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) and means (median: 54.1, 41.0, 27.2 ml/min/1.73 m2) from all two-year moving intervals decreased as CKD advanced; eGFR variability (relative to the mean) increased when CKD progressed (median coefficient of variation: 10.9, 12.8, and 15.4). Cox regressions revealed that one unit increase in a patient’s standard deviation of eGFRs from prior two years was significantly associated with about 7% increase in risk of dialysis/death in the current year, similarly in all three CKD stages. This was after adjusting for concurrent means and slopes of eGFRs, demographics, prior hospitalization, and comorbidities. For example, the hazard of dialysis/death increased by 7.2% (hazard ratio:1.072; 95% CI = 1.067, 1.080) in early stage 3. eGFR variability was independently associated with elevated risk of dialysis/death even after controlling for eGFR means and slopes.

13 April 2021 in Biometrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WWWei Wang
Wei Wang
SLShou-En Lu
Shou-En Lu
JCJerry Q. Cheng
Jerry Q. Cheng
MXMinge Xie
Minge Xie
JKJohn B. Kostis
John B. Kostis

4 January 2025 in The Journal of the American Dental Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CFCecile A. Feldman
Cecile A. Feldman
JFJanine Fredericks-Younger
Janine Fredericks-Younger
PDPaul J. Desjardins
Paul J. Desjardins
HMHans Malmstrom
Hans Malmstrom
MMMichael Miloro
Michael Miloro
SLShou-En Lu
Shou-En Lu
Opioids are still being prescribed to manage acute postsurgical pain. Unnecessary opioid prescriptions can lead to addiction and death, as unused tablets are easily diverted. To determine whether combination nonopioid analgesics are at least as good as opioid analgesics, a multisite, double-blind, randomized, stratified, noninferiority comparative effectiveness trial was conducted, which examined patient-centered outcomes after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction surgery. Participants were randomized to receive 5 mg of hydrocodone with 300 mg of acetaminophen (opioid) or 400 mg of ibuprofen and 500 mg of acetaminophen (nonopioid). After an initial dose, analgesic was taken every 4 through 6 hours as needed for pain. In this randomized multisite clinical trial (n = 1,815 adults), those not taking opioids experienced significantly less pain (numeric rating scale ranging from 0 [no pain] through 10 [worst pain imaginable]) for first day and night (mean difference, -0.70; 95% CI, -0.94 to -0.45; P < .001) and second day and night (mean difference, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.04; P = .015), and experienced no more pain than participants taking opioids over the entire postoperative period (mean difference, -0.20; 98.75% CI, -0.45 to 0.05; P = .172). Participants not taking opioids had higher overall satisfaction at the postoperative visit (85.3% extremely satisfied or satisfied vs 78.9%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.98; P = .006). The ibuprofen and acetaminophen combination managed pain better for the first 2 days and led to greater satisfaction over the entire postoperative period than hydrocodone with acetaminophen. At no time did hydrocodone outperform the nonopioid. Routine opioid prescribing after dental surgery is not supported. The results of this study confirmed the American Dental Association's recommendations that ibuprofen and acetaminophen in combination should be the first-line therapy for acute pain management. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The registration number is NCT04452344.