Alessandro Bozzato

Prof. Alessandro Bozzato

Saarland University Medical Center
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 September 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJan Philipp Kühn
Jan Philipp Kühn
WSWendelin Schmid
Wendelin Schmid
SKSandrina Körner
Sandrina Körner
FBFlorian Bochen
Florian Bochen
SWSilke Wemmert
Silke Wemmert
MLMaximilian Linxweiler
Maximilian Linxweiler
The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is rising globally, presenting challenges for optimized clinical management. To date, it remains unclear which biomarker best reflects HPV-driven carcinogenesis, a process that is associated with better therapeutic response and outcome compared to tobacco/alcohol-induced cancers. Six potential HPV surrogate biomarkers were analyzed using FFPE tissue samples from 153 HNSCC patients (n = 78 oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), n = 35 laryngeal cancer, n = 23 hypopharyngeal cancer, n = 17 oral cavity cancer): p16, CyclinD1, pRb, dual immunohistochemical staining of p16 and Ki67, HPV-DNA-PCR, and HPV-DNA-in situ hybridization (ISH). Biomarkers were analyzed for correlation with one another, tumor subsite, and patient survival. P16-IHC alone showed the best performance for discriminating between good (high expression) vs poor outcome (low expression; p = 0.0030) in OPSCC patients. Additionally, HPV-DNA-ISH (p = 0.0039), HPV-DNA-PCR (p = 0.0113), and p16-Ki67 dual stain (p = 0.0047) were significantly associated with prognosis in uni- and multivariable analysis for oropharyngeal cancer. In the non-OPSCC group, however, none of the aforementioned surrogate markers was prognostic. Taken together, P16-IHC as a single biomarker displays the best diagnostic accuracy for prognosis stratification in OPSCC patients with a direct detection of HPV-DNA by PCR or ISH as well as p16-Ki67 dual stain as potential alternatives.

10 February 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Johannes Matthias WeimerJohannes Matthias Weimer
Johannes Matthias Weimer
MRMaximilian Rink
Maximilian Rink
LMLukas Müller
Lukas Müller
KDKlaus Dirks
Klaus Dirks
CICarlotta Ille
Carlotta Ille
JKJulian Künzel
Julian Künzel
In Germany, progress assessments in head and neck ultrasonography training have been carried out mainly theoretically and lack standardisation. Thus, quality assurance and comparisons between certified courses from various course providers are difficult. This study aimed to develop and integrate a direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in head and neck ultrasound education and explore the perceptions of both participants and examiners. Five DOPS tests oriented towards assessing basic skills were developed for certified head and neck ultrasound courses on national standards. DOPS tests were completed by 76 participants from basic and advanced ultrasound courses (n = 168 documented DOPS tests) and evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. Ten examiners performed and evaluated the DOPS after detailed training. The variables of “general aspects” (6.0 Scale Points (SP) vs. 5.9 SP; p = 0.71), “test atmosphere” (6.3 SP vs. 6.4 SP; p = 0.92), and “test task setting” (6.2 SP vs. 5.9 SP; p = 0.12) were positively evaluated by all participants and examiners. There were no significant differences between a basic and advanced course in relation to the overall results of DOPS tests (p = 0.81). Regardless of the courses, there were significant differences in the total number of points achieved between individual DOPS tests. DOPS tests are accepted by participants and examiners as an assessment tool in head and neck ultrasound education. In view of the trend toward “competence-based” teaching, this type of test format should be applied and validated in the future.

17 October 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSylvia Hartmann
Sylvia Hartmann
SSSonja Scharf
Sonja Scharf
YSYvonne Steiner
Yvonne Steiner
ALAndreas G. Loth
Andreas G. Loth
EDEmmanuel Donnadieu
Emmanuel Donnadieu
MHMartin-Leo Hansmann
Martin-Leo Hansmann
Profound knowledge exists about the clinical, morphologic, genomic, and transcriptomic characteristics of most lymphoma entities. However, information is currently lacking on the dynamic behavior of malignant lymphomas. This pilot study aimed to gain insight into the motility of malignant lymphomas and bystander cells in 20 human lymph nodes. Generally, B cells were faster under reactive conditions compared with B cells in malignant lymphomas. In contrast, PD1-positive T cells did not show systematic differences in velocity between reactive and neoplastic conditions in general. However, lymphomas could be divided into two groups: one with fast PD1-positive T cells (e.g., Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma; means 8.4 and 7.8 µm/min) and another with slower PD1-positive T cells (e.g., mediastinal grey zone lymphoma; mean 3.5 µm/min). Although the number of contacts between lymphoma cells and PD1-positive T cells was similar in different lymphoma types, important differences were observed in the duration of these contacts. Among the lymphomas with fast PD1-positive T cells, contacts were particularly short in mantle cell lymphoma (mean 54 s), whereas nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma presented prolonged contact times (mean 6.1 min). Short contact times in mantle cell lymphoma were associated with the largest spatial displacement of PD1-positive cells (mean 12.3 µm). Although PD1-positive T cells in nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma were fast, they remained in close contact with the lymphoma cells, in line with a dynamic immunological synapse. This pilot study shows for the first time systematic differences in the dynamic behavior of lymphoma and bystander cells between different lymphoma types.

24 May 2009 in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJoachim Albert Hornung
Joachim Albert Hornung
CBChristoph Brase
Christoph Brase
ABAlessandro Bozzato
Alessandro Bozzato
JZJohannes Zenk
Johannes Zenk
BSBernhard Schick
Bernhard Schick
HIHeinrich Iro
Heinrich Iro

27 January 2021 in HNO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TST. Stöver
T. Stöver
SDS. Dazert
S. Dazert
SPStefan Plontke
Stefan Plontke
SKS. Kramer
S. Kramer
PAP. Ambrosch
P. Ambrosch
THT. K. Hoffmann
T. K. Hoffmann
Zusammenfassung: Hintergrund: Ab Frühjahr 2020 kam es zur weltweiten Verbreitung von SARS-CoV‑2 mit der heute als erste Welle der Pandemie bezeichneten Phase ab März 2020. Diese resultierte an vielen Kliniken in Umstrukturierungen und Ressourcenverschiebungen. Ziel unserer Arbeit war die Erfassung der Auswirkungen der Pandemie auf die universitäre Hals-Nasen-Ohren(HNO)-Heilkunde für die Forschung, Lehre und Weiterbildung. Material und Methoden: Die Direktorinnen und Direktoren der 39 Universitäts-HNO-Kliniken in Deutschland wurden mithilfe einer strukturierten Online-Befragung zu den Auswirkungen der Pandemie im Zeitraum von März bis April 2020 auf die Forschung, Lehre und die Weiterbildung befragt. Ergebnisse: Alle 39 Direktorinnen und Direktoren beteiligten sich an der Umfrage. Hiervon gaben 74,4 % (29/39) an, dass es zu einer Verschlechterung ihrer Forschungstätigkeit infolge der Pandemie gekommen sei. Von 61,5 % (24/39) wurde berichtet, dass pandemiebezogene Forschungsaspekte aufgegriffen wurden. Von allen Kliniken wurde eine Einschränkung der Präsenzlehre berichtet und 97,5 % (38/39) führten neue digitale Lehrformate ein. Im Beobachtungszeitraum sahen 74,4 % der Klinikdirektoren die Weiterbildung der Assistenten nicht gefährdet. Schlussfolgerung: Die Ergebnisse geben einen Einblick in die heterogenen Auswirkungen der Pandemie. Die kurzfristige Bearbeitung pandemiebezogener Forschungsthemen und die Einführung innovativer digitaler Konzepte für die studentische Lehre belegt eindrücklich das große innovative Potenzial und die schnelle Reaktionsfähigkeit der HNO-Universitätskliniken, um auch während der Pandemie ihre Aufgaben in der Forschung, Lehre und Weiterbildung bestmöglich zu erfüllen.

16 May 2022 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLukas Pillong
Lukas Pillong
ABAlessandro Bozzato
Alessandro Bozzato
DHDietmar Hecker
Dietmar Hecker
VBVictoria Bozzato
Victoria Bozzato
BSBernhard Schick
Bernhard Schick
PKPhilipp Kulas
Philipp Kulas
The COVID-19 pandemic has strongly highlighted the need for more digitalization in healthcare. Teaching ultrasound skills in online courses is a key challenge in this context. The aim of this study was to establish an online video-based head and neck ultrasound course with an evaluation of the quality, effectiveness, and feasibility of this teaching method compared to in-person teaching. Twenty-two medical students were taught head and neck ultrasound in two groups: one group in an in-person course and the other one in a video-based course. Learning success was analyzed using self-evaluation forms and external assessment by an experienced ultrasonographer. Comparing pre- and post-training self-evaluation, all participants showed statistically significant learning progress. In the external assessment, the overall scores in both groups did not differ significantly. The courses themselves were positively evaluated by all participants. Herein, we present the first feasibility study of a web-based head and neck-ultrasound course for medical students. The methodology provides the potential for future changes in telemedical education and sustainable improvements in telemedical teaching and global intra-clinical and interdisciplinary patient care.