Jasmina Bijelic-Donova

Dr. Jasmina Bijelic-Donova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2016 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi
LLLippo V.J. Lassila
Lippo V.J. Lassila
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu

1 January 2016 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu
LLLippo V.J. Lassila
Lippo V.J. Lassila

31 December 2014 in European Journal of Oral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi
LLLippo V. J. Lassila
Lippo V. J. Lassila
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu

1 March 2020 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu
LLLippo V.J. Lassila
Lippo V.J. Lassila

29 March 2011 in The Open Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi
PVPekka K Vallittu
Pekka K Vallittu
LLLippo V.J Lassila
Lippo V.J Lassila
Purpose: This study evaluated the load bearing capacity of anatomically designed canines restored with FRC posts and experimental short fiber composite resin (FC). The effect of using three different types of tooth preparation and woven net on the fracture load was also investigated. Further aim was to evaluate the failure mode of each restoration. Material and methods: 80 maxillary frasaco-canines were divided into 10 groups (n=8). The anatomic crowns were cut perpendicular at CEJ of the tooth. Group 1 was composed of teeth with flattened surface. Groups 2, 3 & 4 were prepared of teeth with 2 mm ferrule. In the third group, everStick Net was applied above the ferrule. Group 5 was composed of teeth with large box type preparation. The root canals were enlarged, sandblasted and then surface treated with Stick resin for 5 min. Two types of FRC root canal posts were used. The crowns were prepared either with composite resin or with FC. A static load until failure was applied to the crowns at a 45 degrees angle. Failure modes were visually examined. Results: ANOVA revealed that use of FRC-post and tooth preparation (p0.001). Chi-square test revealed that both, crown design and existence of FRC-post effected significantly fracture types (p<0.001). Conclusion: FC demonstrated similar load bearing capacity with restorations reinforced with FRC post. The presence of ferrule around the tooth increased the load bearing capacity significantly. Abbreviations: EET – endodontically treated teeth; FRC – fiber-reinforced composite; semi-IPN – semi-interpenetrating network; CEJ – cementoenamel junction; FC – experimental short fiber composite; SiC – silicon carbide abrasive paper; N – newton; FEM – finite element method.

4 December 2012 in Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu
LLLippo V.J. Lassila
Lippo V.J. Lassila
Objective. To evaluate the static-load-bearing capacity of severely damaged endodontically-treated incisors restored with short fiber composite (SFC) as a direct post-core-crown complex and to investigate the effect of SFC on the failure mode of the restorations. Materials and methods. The clinical crowns of 40 maxillary incisors were prepared by cutting 2/3 parts of the crown horizontally. Five groups were fabricated (n = 8) using the direct technique; Group A: Crown restorations from conventional composite (CC); Group B: FRC-posts with core-crown restorations from CC; Group C: Crown restorations from SFC; Group D: FRC-posts and core-crown restorations from SFC; Group E: Post–core-crown restorations from SFC. The posts were cemented with dual-cure resin cement. The restorations were polymerized with a hand-light curing unit. All restored teeth were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 5 days before they were statically loaded. Initial fracture (IF) and final fracture (FF) were recorded. Failure modes were visually examined. Results. ANOVA revealed that SFC restorations had greater IF (469.8 N) and FF load values (515.8 N) (p < 0.05) than the CC restorations (164.8 N). No significant difference for both IF and FF was observed among groups C, D and E. Group E revealed a more favorable fracture mode than any other material combination used. Conclusion. The use of SFC as a restorative material for fabricating the direct composite post-core-crown restorations of severely damaged incisors provided improved load-bearing capacity than CC used alone or with FRC post reinforcement.