Filip Keulemans

Dr. Filip Keulemans


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLippo Lassila
Lippo Lassila
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
ESEija Säilynoja
Eija Säilynoja
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi

1 September 2016 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJasmina Bijelic-Donova
Jasmina Bijelic-Donova
Sufyan GaroushiSufyan Garoushi
Sufyan Garoushi
LLLippo V.J. Lassila
Lippo V.J. Lassila
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
PVPekka K. Vallittu
Pekka K. Vallittu

1 January 2015 in The Scientific World Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RMRoeland De Moor
Roeland De Moor
JVJeroen Verheyen
Jeroen Verheyen
ADAndrii Diachuk
Andrii Diachuk
PVPeter Verheyen
Peter Verheyen
MMMaarten August Meire
Maarten August Meire
Laurence James WalshLaurence James Walsh
Laurence James Walsh
The use of optical radiation for the activation of bleaching products has not yet been completely elucidated. Laser light is suggested to enhance the oxidizing effect of hydrogen peroxide. Different methods of enhancing hydrogen peroxide based bleaching are possible. They can be classified into six groups: alkaline pH environment, thermal enhancement and photothermal effect, photooxidation effect and direct photobleaching, photolysis effect and photodissociation, Fenton reaction and photocatalysis, and photodynamic effect.

8 August 2024 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGiny Judith Pot
Giny Judith Pot
POPatricia Anna Van Overschelde
Patricia Anna Van Overschelde
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
CKCornelis J Kleverlaan
Cornelis J Kleverlaan
João Paulo Mendes TribstJoão Paulo Mendes Tribst
João Paulo Mendes Tribst
The introduction of 3D printing technology in dentistry has opened new treatment options. The ongoing development of different materials for these printing purposes has recently enabled the production of definitive indirect restorations via 3D printing. To identify relevant data, a systematic search was conducted in three databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, a manual search using individual search terms was performed. Only English, peer-reviewed articles that encompassed in vitro or in vivo research on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed composite materials were included, provided they met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After screening 1142 research articles, 14 primary studies were selected. The included studies mainly utilized digital light processing (DLP) technology, less commonly stereolithography (SLA), and once PolyJet printing technology. The material properties of various composite resins, such as VarseoSmile Crown Plus (VSC) and Crowntec (CT), were studied, including Vickers hardness, flexural strength, elastic modulus, compressive strength, tensile strength, fracture resistance, and wear. The studies aimed to compare the behavior of the tested additive composites to each other, conventional composites, and subtractive-manufactured materials. This scoping review examined the mechanical properties of composites used for 3D printing of definitive restorations. The aim was to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on this topic and identify any gaps for future research. The findings suggest that 3D-printed composites are not yet the first option for indirect restorations, due to their insufficient mechanical properties. Due to limited evidence, more research is needed in this area. Specifically, there is a need for clinical trials and long-term in vivo research.

1 January 2015 in The Scientific World Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
ASAkikazu Shinya
Akikazu Shinya
LLLippo V J Lassila
Lippo V J Lassila
PVPekka K Vallittu
Pekka K Vallittu
CKCornelis J Kleverlaan
Cornelis J Kleverlaan
RMRoeland J G De Moor
Roeland J G De Moor
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different framework materials on biomechanical behaviour of anterior two‐unit cantilever resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). A three‐dimensional finite element model of a two‐unit cantilever RBFDP replacing a maxillary lateral incisor was created. Five framework materials were evaluated: direct fibre‐reinforced composite (FRC‐Z250), indirect fibre‐reinforced composite (FRC‐ES), gold alloy (M), glass ceramic (GC), and zirconia (ZI). Finite element analysis was performed and stress distribution was evaluated. A similar stress pattern, with stress concentrations in the connector area, was observed in RBFDPs for all materials. Maximal principal stress showed a decreasing order: ZI > M > GC > FRC‐ES > FRC‐Z250. The maximum displacement of RBFDPs was higher for FRC‐Z250 and FRC‐ES than for M, GC, and ZI. FE analysis depicted differences in location of the maximum stress at the luting cement interface between materials. For FRC‐Z250 and FRC‐ES, the maximum stress was located in the upper part of the proximal area of the retainer, whereas, for M, GC, and ZI, the maximum stress was located at the cervical outline of the retainer. The present study revealed differences in biomechanical behaviour between all RBFDPs. The general observation was that a RBFDP made of FRC provided a more favourable stress distribution.

1 November 2009 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FKFilip Keulemans
Filip Keulemans
PPPrem Palav
Prem Palav
MAMoustafa M.N. Aboushelib
Moustafa M.N. Aboushelib
ADAndy van Dalen
Andy van Dalen
CKCornelis J. Kleverlaan
Cornelis J. Kleverlaan
AFAlbert J. Feilzer
Albert J. Feilzer