Michał Pomianowski

Dr. Michał Pomianowski

Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

23 April 2014 in Building Simulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TYTao Yu
Tao Yu
Per HeiselbergPer Heiselberg
Per Heiselberg
BLBo Lei
Bo Lei
Michał PomianowskiMichał Pomianowski
Michał Pomianowski


4 June 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnna Marszal-Pomianowska
Anna Marszal-Pomianowska
RJRasmus Lund Jensen
Rasmus Lund Jensen
Michał PomianowskiMichał Pomianowski
Michał Pomianowski
OLOlena Kalyanova Larsen
Olena Kalyanova Larsen
JJJacob Scharling Jørgensen
Jacob Scharling Jørgensen
SKSofie Sand Knudsen
Sofie Sand Knudsen
There is very little knowledge on the occupant actual hot water comfort (temperature and flow), usage practice, and routines (temporal and spatial distribution of hot water usage in a household). This paper describes the results from the total and hot water measurements in two Danish detached houses. The results show that, at the draw-off points, the temperature of 55 °C is never asked by the occupants, not even in the kitchen sink. The domestic water temperature differentiates depending on the function of the draw-off point, with the shower and kitchen taps being most energy- and water-intense. They constitute around 90% of the hot water use in the house. Shower units on average demand for highest temperature (i.e., 35.5 °C to 40.4 °C). Hand washing operates, on average, at temperature between 20.5 °C to 26.5 °C. Average water temperature at the taps located in utility room varies between 23 °C to 26 °C. These in-depth insight in the total and hot water use in two new-built low energy houses, can a) help building professionals designing more efficient hot water installations; b) enhance the research work on energy flexibility buildings by providing knowledge on most energy-intensive draw-off points; and c) facilitate district heating professionals in improving the network performance.

30 April 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YAYovko Antonov
Yovko Antonov
Per HeiselbergPer Heiselberg
Per Heiselberg
Michał PomianowskiMichał Pomianowski
Michał Pomianowski
Reaching environmental targets set by the European Union (EU) requires a constant renovation of the existing building stock to nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB) in a cost-optimal manner. Studies show that the renovation rate of the existing building stock is more than two times less than what is necessary to reach the targets. Furthermore, the majority of performed renovations across the EU reach just a small amount of energy savings, whereas NZEB renovations are rarely achieved. This paper proposes a methodology for the evaluation of renovation measures, aiming to provide decision support related to the selection of what to renovate and to what extent. The proposed method is rooted in the well-established cost-optimal methodology, yet it suggests a pre-step to package evaluation. This is done by means of a simplified cost-effective parameter (CEP), linking cost, lifetime, and energy savings. The methodology is demonstrated using a case study building in Denmark. The results show that the CEP provides good grounds for the compilation of single actions to packages. Further developments could focus on the sensitivity of the model inputs and integration of additional evaluation parameters to cost, such as environmental, architectural, comfort, risk, etc.

31 May 2020 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YAYovko Antonov
Yovko Antonov
Per HeiselbergPer Heiselberg
Per Heiselberg
FFFlourentzos Flourentzou
Flourentzos Flourentzou
Michał PomianowskiMichał Pomianowski
Michał Pomianowski
Renovation of existing buildings is an indispensable part of achieving European efficiency and environmental targets. This paper applies different assessment methodologies to find optimal renovation, given different evaluation criteria. The performed literature study identifies the cost-optimal methodology employing Life Cycle Cost (LCC) calculation as one of the most common assessment methods. This paper proposes a new renovation assessment method targeted to the early design phases of specific building projects. The method has a simple structure, and can be used as a roadmap of necessary activities for obtaining solid building knowledge and required energy and cost calculations. The methodology is based on linking economic and energy efficiency parameters into defined cost-effective value, calculated for all investigated renovation actions. The cost-effectiveness value is used for ranking and selecting the most appropriate single renovation actions to form renovation packages, which can be further examined in detail (for example, with LCC). To demonstrate the method, evaluate the strengths, and identify the weaknesses, it is applied to case study buildings in Denmark and Switzerland. The results show that, in the initial stage, the proposed cost-effectiveness representation can be used successfully to compare and evaluate different envelope elements and systems. Cost-effectiveness also provides rational results on a package level. Further work is still required in the area of evaluation of energy supply and renewable energy production systems.