Treatment of recurrent malignant ascites in cancer patients is a challenge. Evidence based guidelines regarding the best treatment strategy are lacking. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a tunnelled peritoneal catheter (PleurX) in cancer patients with symptomatic ascites. Patients with symptomatic, diuretics-refractory ascites and indication for the implantation of a tunnelled peritoneal PleurX catheter were prospectively enrolled between August 2018 and July 2020. The number of catheter days, complications, amount of drained ascites and ascites-associated symptoms and hospitalization rate pre- and post-PleurX insertion were analysed. 51 Patients (64.7% male) were prospectively enrolled. The mean age was 66.6 (±7.9) years. The most common cause of ascites was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 10) followed by cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 9) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 8). The technical success rate of PleurX implantation was 100%. The mean volume of weakly drained ascites was 5.44l (±4.08). Major complications included cellulitis (n = 2), peritonitis and drainage dislocation (each n = 1). The mean catheter days per patient was 59.8 (±107.4) (Min 4, Max 668). Abdominal discomfort, impaired mobility, dyspnoea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting were significantly reduced 30 days after PleurX insertion (p < 0.05). Moreover, hospitalization rate was significantly reduced (p < 0.001; 27.08% of days preimplantation vs. 11.27% postimplantation). We conclude that implantation of a tunnelled ascites catheter is a safe and effective method for the treatment of refractory ascites in cancer patients with advanced disease. Serious complications are rare. Burdensome ascites-associated symptoms and hospitalization rates can be significantly reduced over a longer period of time.

We describe here 11 consecutive patients with recurrence of high-grade glioma treated with regorafenib at our university medical center. The majority of patients had MGMT promoter methylation (9/11 cases). Regorafenib was given as 2nd line systemic treatment in 6/11 patients and 3rd or higher line treatment in 5/11 patients. The median number of applied cycles was 2 with dosage reductions in 5/11. Response to treatment was observed in 4/11 (PR in 1/11, and SD in 3/11). Median overall survival for the cohort was 16.1 months, median progression-free survival 9.0 months, and median time to treatment failure 3.3 months. Side effects of any CTCAE grade were noted in all patients, hereby 6/11 with CTCAE °III-IV reactions. High-grade side effects were of dermatologic, cardiovascular, and hematologic nature. A mean treatment delay of 57.5 days (range 23–119) was noted between tumor board recommendation and treatment initiation due to the application process for off-label use in this indication. In conclusion, treatment with regorafenib in relapsed high-grade glioma is a feasible treatment option but has to be considered carefully due to the significant side effect profile.

Treatment of high-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (hr-MDS) and (secondary) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) remains a clinical challenge. The combination of azacitidine and venetoclax (aza/ven) may improve treatment outcomes, but still fails in a significant fraction of patients. We established a single-center collection of longitudinal samples from patients with MDS and AML/sAML and performed comprehensive genetic, proteomic and functional apoptosis profiling to identify biomarkers and targetable escape mechanisms to aza/ven. Baseline genetic characterization ( n = 55) identified high-risk genetic alterations, while longitudinal analyses ( n = 268, mean 8.7 [3–20] timepoints) revealed distinct genetic profiles of clonal evolution. Functional BH3-profiling at treatment initiation identified heterogeneous dependencies on BCL-2 family members. Notably, high BCL-2 dependence correlated with genetic response to aza/ven and improved overall survival, whereas increased BCL-xL dependence was associated with resistance. We further identified patterns of acquired resistance, with loss of apoptotic priming and shifts in anti-apoptotic dependencies contributing to treatment failure. BH3 profiling revealed functional shifts toward MCL-1 and/or BCL-xL in individual cases, suggesting potential therapeutic targets to overcome resistance. In vitro, BCL-xL inhibition effectively counteracted resistance in increased BCL-xL dependence cases. In summary, we characterized treatment-associated clonal evolution in MDS and AML, providing insights into clinical response, disease progression and potential individualized therapeutic strategies.

Identification of the optimal treatment strategy is challenging in elderly with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Concurrent chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin represents an option for elderly. Outcomes (1) in elderly (≥70 years, n = 158) vs. younger patients (n = 188) and (2), independently of age, in definitive radiochemotherapy, with low-dose cisplatin (n = 125) vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine (n = 76) were studied. Elderly included more males, had a lower Karnofsky index, more comorbidities, and lower stages. Low-dose cisplatin patients (vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine) had higher age, more comorbidities, and lower stages. We observed reduced dermatitis and dysphagia and increased anemia and thrombocytopenia in elderly vs. younger patients, without increased ≥grade 3 toxicities. Low-dose cisplatin was less toxic than cisplatin/vinorelbine. Survival outcomes were lower in elderly vs. younger and comparable between low-dose cisplatin and cisplatin/vinorelbine. In elderly, gender, Karnofsky index, stage, and multimodal treatment (including additional surgery/systemic therapy) were identified as prognostic factors. In conclusion, we found evidence for an acceptable toxicity profile and the need for improvement of outcomes in elderly with localized NSCLC. Multimodal strategies (including additional surgery/systemic treatment) showed favorable outcomes and should be reasonably considered in elderly who are deemed fit enough. Low-dose cisplatin should be discussed on an individual basis due to favorable toxicity and outcomes.

The internal organ at risk volume (IRV) concept might improve toxicity profiles in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied (1) clinical aspects in central vs. peripheral tumors, (2) the IRV concept in central tumors, (3) organ motion, and (4) associated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). We analyzed patients who received SBRT for NSCLC (clinical aspects, n = 78; motion management, n = 35). We found lower biologically effective doses, larger planning target volume sizes, higher lung doses, and worse locoregional control for central vs. peripheral tumors. Organ motion was greater in males and tall patients (bronchial tree), whereas volume changes were lower in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (esophagus). Applying the IRV concept (retrospectively, without new optimization), we found an absolute increase of >10% in NTCPs for the bronchial tree in three patients. This study emphasizes the need to optimize methods to balance dose escalation with toxicities in central tumors. There is evidence that organ motion/volume changes could be more pronounced in males and tall patients, and less pronounced in patients with higher BMI. Since recent studies have made efforts to further subclassify central tumors to refine treatment, the IRV concept should be considered for optimal risk assessment.

Background/Objectives: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare but aggressive tumor, primarily affecting elderly patients. Radiotherapy (RT) remains an important treatment option, particularly for patients who are ineligible for systemic chemotherapy. This study aims to identify prognostic factors and evaluate recurrence patterns in a real-world cohort of PCNSL patients treated with RT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 64 PCNSL patients treated with radiotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2022. Clinical characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected by chart review. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods. Recurrence patterns were assessed based on available post-treatment imaging. Results: Median patient age was 71 years (range: 31–83); 53.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2. Radiotherapy was used as first-line treatment in 62.5% of cases, primarily due to contraindications to chemotherapy. Median OS was 10 months from diagnosis. Age, poor performance status, seizures at presentation, absence of systemic therapy, incomplete radiotherapy, and <80% applied dose of planned radiotherapy were associated with inferior OS in our univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis confirmed age, systemic therapy, seizures, and radiotherapy dose <80% as independent predictors. Among twenty-nine patients with imaging follow-up, eight recurrences after RT were documented: six of those within, and two outside of the initially affected areas. All recurrences occurred within previously irradiated areas. Conclusions: This study confirms known negative prognostic factors in PCNSL and underscores the importance of systemic chemotherapy for curatively intended treatments aiming for prolonged survival. The recurrence patterns observed question the added benefit of whole-brain irradiation in preventing distant relapses. These findings support the need for prospective trials to optimize radiotherapy strategies while balancing efficacy and neurotoxicity.