Giuliana Franceschinis

Prof. Giuliana Franceschinis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 January 2003
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
ABA. Bobbio
A. Bobbio
GFGiuliana Franceschinis
Giuliana Franceschinis
RGR. Gaeta
R. Gaeta
Not AvailableNot Available
Not Available
This paper explores the possibility of converting Fault Trees (FT) into the Generalized Stochastic Petri Net (GSPN) formalism. Starting from a slightly modified version of a conversion algorithm already appeared in the literature, the aim of the paper is to exploit the modeling and decision power of GSPN for both the qualitative and the quantitative analysis of the modeled system. The qualitative analysis resorts to structural properties and is based on a T-invariant analysis. In order to alleviate the state space explosion problem deriving from the quantitative analysis, the paper proposes a new formalism for FT, that is referred to as High Level FT (HLFT), in which replicated redundant units are folded and indexed. Starting from the HLFT formalism, a new conversion algorithm is provided that translates a HLFT into a Stochastic Well-formed Net (SWN). The computational saving of using SWN with respect to GSPN is carefully examined considering an example of a fault-tolerant multiprocessor system.

9 July 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDAVIDE CEROTTI
DAVIDE CEROTTI
DRDaniele Codetta Raiteri
Daniele Codetta Raiteri
GDGiovanna Dondossola
Giovanna Dondossola
LELavinia Egidi
Lavinia Egidi
GFGiuliana Franceschinis
Giuliana Franceschinis
RTRoberta Terruggia
Roberta Terruggia
This work proposes an approach based on dynamic Bayesian networks to support the cybersecurity analysis of network-based controllers in distributed energy plants. We built a system model that exploits real world context information from both information and operational technology environments in the energy infrastructure, and we use it to demonstrate the value of security evidence for time-driven predictive and diagnostic analyses. The innovative contribution of this work is in the methodology capability of capturing the causal and temporal dependencies involved in the assessment of security threats, and in the introduction of security analytics supporting the configuration of anomaly detection platforms for digital energy infrastructures.

30 June 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
LCLORENZO CAPRA
LORENZO CAPRA
MPMassimiliano De Pierro
Massimiliano De Pierro
GFGiuliana Franceschinis
Giuliana Franceschinis

25 October 2023 in ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElvio Gilberto Amparore
Elvio Gilberto Amparore
MBMarco Beccuti
Marco Beccuti
PCPaolo Castagno
Paolo Castagno
SPSimone Pernice
Simone Pernice
GFGiuliana Franceschinis
Giuliana Franceschinis
MPMarzio Pennisi
Marzio Pennisi
Computational modeling has become a widespread approach for studying real-world phenomena by using different modeling perspectives, in particular, the microscopic point of view concentrates on the behavior of the single components and their interactions from which the global system evolution emerges, while the macroscopic point of view represents the system’s overall behavior abstracting as much as possible from that of the single components. The preferred point of view depends on the effort required to develop the model, on the detail level of the available information about the system to be modeled, and on the type of measures that are of interest to the modeler; each point of view may lead to a different modeling language and simulation paradigm. An approach adequate for the microscopic point of view is Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation, which has gained popularity in the last few decades but lacks a formal definition common to the different tools supporting it. This may lead to modeling mistakes and wrong interpretation of the results, especially when comparing models of the same system developed according to different points of view. The aim of the work described in this paper is to provide a common compositional modeling language from which both a macro and a micro simulation model can be automatically derived: these models are coherent by construction and may be studied through different simulation approaches and tools. A framework is thus proposed in which a model can be composed using a Petri Net formalism and then studied through both an Agent-Based Simulation and a classical Stochastic Simulation Algorithm, depending on the study goal.

6 August 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDAVIDE CEROTTI
DAVIDE CEROTTI
DRDaniele Codetta Raiteri
Daniele Codetta Raiteri
GDGiovanna Dondossola
Giovanna Dondossola
LELavinia Egidi
Lavinia Egidi
GFGiuliana Franceschinis
Giuliana Franceschinis
RTRoberta Terruggia
Roberta Terruggia
SecuriDN v. 0.1 is a tool for the representation of the assets composing the IT and the OT subsystems of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) control networks and the possible cyberattacks that can threaten them. It is part of a platform that allows the evaluation of the security risks of DER control systems. SecuriDN is a multi-formalism tool, meaning that it manages several types of models: architecture graph, attack graphs and Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs). In particular, each asset in the architecture is characterized by an attack graph showing the combinations of attack techniques that may affect the asset. By merging the attack graphs according to the asset associations in the architecture, a DBN is generated. Then, the evidence-based and time-driven probabilistic analysis of the DBN permits the quantification of the system security level. Indeed, the DBN probabilistic graphical model can be analyzed through inference algorithms, suitable for forward and backward assessment of the system’s belief state. In this paper, the features and the main goals of SecuriDN are described and illustrated through a simplified but realistic case study.

27 November 2021
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
MBM. Beccuti
M. Beccuti
PCP. Castagno
P. Castagno
GFGiuliana Franceschinis
Giuliana Franceschinis
MPM. Pennisi
M. Pennisi
SPSimone Pernice
Simone Pernice