Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that affects 5–10% of reproductive age women. Nonetheless, the average time-to-diagnosis is usually between 6 and 10 years from the onset of symptoms. To shorten time-to-diagnosis, many studies have developed non-invasive screening tools. However, most of these studies have focused on data obtained from women who had/were planned for laparoscopy surgery, that is, women who were near the end of the diagnostic process. In contrast, our study aimed to develop a self-diagnostic tool that predicts the likelihood of endometriosis based only on experienced symptoms, which can be used in early stages of symptom onset. We applied machine learning to train endometriosis prediction models on data obtained via questionnaires from two groups of women: women who were diagnosed with endometriosis and women who were not diagnosed. The best performing model had AUC of 0.94, sensitivity of 0.93, and specificity of 0.95. The model is intended to be incorporated into a website as a self-diagnostic tool and is expected to shorten time-to-diagnosis by referring women with a high likelihood of having endometriosis to further examination. We also report the importance and effectiveness of different symptoms in predicting endometriosis.

Background: The association between gastrointestinal intolerance during early enteral nutrition (EN) and adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients is controversial. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) markers during early ICU stays and to predict early EN failure using a machine learning (ML) approach. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from adult patients admitted to Beilinson Hospital ICU between January 2011 and December 2018 for more than 48 h and received EN. Clinical data, including demographics, severity scores, EFI markers, and medications, along with 72 h after admission, were analyzed by ML algorithms. Prediction performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUCROC) of a ten-fold cross-validation set. Results: The datasets comprised 1584 patients. The means of the cross-validation AUCROCs for 90-day mortality and early EN failure were 0.73 (95% CI 0.71–0.75) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.67–0.74), respectively. Gastric residual volume above 250 mL on the second day was an important component of both prediction models. Conclusions: ML underlined the EFI markers that predict poor 90-day outcomes and early EN failure and supports early recognition of at-risk patients. Results have to be confirmed in further prospective and external validation studies.

An ontology is a formal representation of domain knowledge, which can be interpreted by machines. In recent years, ontologies have become a major tool for domain knowledge representation and a core component of many knowledge management systems, decision-support systems and other intelligent systems, inter alia, in the context of agriculture. A review of the existing literature on agricultural ontologies, however, reveals that most of the studies, which propose agricultural ontologies, are lacking an explicit evaluation procedure. This is undesired because without well-structured evaluation processes, it is difficult to consider the value of ontologies to research and practice. Moreover, it is difficult to rely on such ontologies and share them on the Semantic Web or between semantic-aware applications. With the growing number of ontology-based agricultural systems and the increasing popularity of the Semantic Web, it becomes essential that such evaluation methods are applied during the ontology development process. Our work contributes to the literature on agricultural ontologies by presenting a framework that guides the selection of suitable evaluation methods, which seems to be missing from most existing studies on agricultural ontologies. The framework supports the matching of appropriate evaluation methods for a given ontology based on the ontology’s purpose.