To improve image quality and CT number accuracy of fast-scan low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) through a deep-learning convolutional neural network (CNN) methodology for head-and-neck (HN) radiotherapy. Fifty-five paired CBCT and CT images from HN patients were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 15 patients underwent adaptive replanning during treatment, thus had same-day CT/CBCT pairs. The remaining 40 patients (post-operative) had paired planning CT and 1st fraction CBCT images with minimal anatomic changes. A 2D U-Net architecture with 27-layers in 5 depths was built for the CNN. CNN training was performed using data from 40 post-operative HN patients with 2080 paired CT/CBCT slices. Validation and test datasets include 5 same-day datasets with 260 slice pairs and 10 same-day datasets with 520 slice pairs, respectively. To examine the impact of differences in training dataset selection and network performance as a function of training data size, additional networks were trained using 30, 40 and 50 datasets. Image quality of enhanced CBCT images were quantitatively compared against the CT image using mean absolute error (MAE) of Hounsfield units (HU), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). Enhanced CBCT images reduced artifact distortion and improved soft tissue contrast. Networks trained with 40 datasets had imaging performance comparable to those trained with 50 datasets and outperformed those trained with 30 datasets. Comparison of CBCT and enhanced CBCT images demonstrated improvement in average MAE from 172.73 to 49.28 HU, SNR from 8.27 to 14.25 dB, and SSIM from 0.42 to 0.85. The image processing time is 2 s per patient using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GPU. The proposed deep-leaning methodology was fast and effective for image quality enhancement of fast-scan low-dose CBCT. This method has potential to support fast online-adaptive re-planning for HN cancer patients.

Objectives: Early detection and accurate diagnosis of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in head and neck cancer (HNC) are crucial for enhancing patient prognosis and survival rates. Current imaging methods have limitations, necessitating new evaluation of new diagnostic techniques. This study investigates the potential of combining pre-operative CT and intra-operative fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIm) to enhance LNM prediction in HNC using primary tumor signatures. Methods: CT and FLIm data were collected from 46 HNC patients. A total of 42 FLIm features and 924 CT radiomic features were extracted from the primary tumor site and fused. A support vector machine (SVM) model with a radial basis function kernel was trained to predict LNM. Hyperparameter tuning was conducted using 10-fold nested cross-validation. Prediction performance was evaluated using balanced accuracy (bACC) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: The model, leveraging combined CT and FLIm features, demonstrated improved testing accuracy (bACC: 0.71, AUC: 0.79) over the CT-only (bACC: 0.58, AUC: 0.67) and FLIm-only (bACC: 0.61, AUC: 0.72) models. Feature selection identified that a subset of 10 FLIm and 10 CT features provided optimal predictive capability. Feature contribution analysis identified high-pass and low-pass wavelet-filtered CT images as well as Laguerre coefficients from FLIm as key predictors. Conclusions: Combining CT and FLIm of the primary tumor improves the prediction of HNC LNM compared to either modality alone. Significance: This study underscores the potential of combining pre-operative radiomics with intra-operative FLIm for more accurate LNM prediction in HNC, offering promise to enhance patient outcomes.

Background: Metastatic lymph node (MLN) detection remains a major clinical challenge in head and neck cancer, as nodal involvement is strongly associated with poor prognosis and directly affects treatment planning. Previous approaches typically rely on cropped lymph node (LN) regions or tumor contours for MLN identification, requiring substantial expert annotation during preprocessing and relying solely on imaging information. As a result, small or low-contrast metastatic nodes may be missed, while benign lymph nodes may be incorrectly identified as metastatic due to overlapping imaging characteristics. To address these limitations, we propose a multimodal learning framework that integrates anatomical and metabolic features from head and neck PET/CT images with biochemical features derived from FLIm for patient-level MLN prediction, without requiring manual lymph node cropping or tumor contouring during inference. Methods: To enable robust imaging representation learning, a region-aware PET/CT network based on a merging-diverging architecture was first pretrained on the HECKTOR 2022 dataset and then fine-tuned on the institutional cohort. In parallel, FLIm point-wise measurements with clinical variables were encoded using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and aggregated into subject-level representations. To effectively combine these modalities, two multimodal fusion strategies were evaluated at the decoder stage, including cube-based fusion and squeeze-and-excitation (SE)-based fusion. The proposed strategies were evaluated on a cohort of 53 patients. Results: Compared with the single-modality baselines, both multimodal fusion strategies achieved better patient-level MLN prediction. The PET/CT-only segmentation-driven model and FLIm-only model reached balanced accuracies of 0.815 and 0.665, with AUCs of 0.828 and 0.614, respectively. Cube-based fusion improved balanced accuracy and AUC to 0.827 and 0.850, respectively, while channel-wise SE-based fusion achieved the best overall performance, with a balanced accuracy of 0.839 and an AUC of 0.872. Conclusions: These results suggest that multimodal integration may improve patient-level MLN prediction compared with single-modality approaches. Given the limited sample size, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger, independent patient cohorts.

Background: Atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) are aggressive fat cell tumors that are distinguished from benign lipomas (SL) mainly through histopathology. Biopsy is needed for suspicious cases but can miss malignancy, so complete surgical removal and examination are essential. MRI is used but often can't differentiate ALT from SL. We introduce a machine learning method for tumor classification. Purpose: To characterize the classification performance of a Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) model, built from MR radiomic features, and compare it to the readings of a musculoskeletal radiologist in classifying atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) from simple lipomas. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 5 medical institutions in North America, for a total of 437 patients; the mean age was 58 years ±12 years, with 248 men and 287 women. At each institution, at least T1-MRI images without contrast were collected from patients with suspected ALT prior to surgery. Histopathology was used as the reference standard. Radiomic features extracted from the MRI images were used to train the BART model and a random forest model for comparison of classification performance using a 10-fold cross-validation. Both models were compared with the classifications of an experienced (>10 years) musculoskeletal radiologist who scored the images on a 5-point scale. Results: A cohort of 423 patients was included, and 1132 radiomic features were extracted from each MR study. The BART model had an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 77.07% (72.76%-80.99%), 77.67% (71.36%-83.16%), and 76.50% (70.28%-81.97%), respectively, when utilizing all predictors and aggregating training and testing data from all the cohorts, approximating the human reader at 78.72% (74.51%-82.53%), 76.21% (69.80%-81.85%), and 81.11% (75.25%-86.09%), respectively. In the external validation, the average area under the curve (AUC) value across cohorts between the BART model and the human reader differed by 0.04 AUC points. From the receiver operating characteristic curve, the AUC was calculated to be 84.72% (81.00%-88.50%) and 84.74% (81.00%-88.50%) for the BART and human reader, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the BART model can distinguish ALT from lipoma with diagnostic performance comparable to an experienced human observer.