Wanpeng Feng

Dr. Wanpeng Feng

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2008 in Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YZYong Zhang
Yong Zhang
Wanpeng FengWanpeng Feng
Wanpeng Feng
LXLisheng Xu
Lisheng Xu
CZChengHu Zhou
ChengHu Zhou
YCYunTai Chen
YunTai Chen

26 July 2013 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wanpeng FengWanpeng Feng
Wanpeng Feng
Zhenhong LiZhenhong Li
Zhenhong Li
JEJohn Elliott
John Elliott
YFYo Fukushima
Yo Fukushima
THTrevor Hoey
Trevor Hoey
ZXZhonghuai Xu
Zhonghuai Xu
We used two tracks of ALOS PALSAR images to investigate the focal mechanism and slip distribution of the 2011 March 24, MW 6.8 Burma strike-slip earthquake. Three different SAR techniques, namely conventional interferometry, SAR pixel offsets (SPO) and multiple-aperture InSAR (MAI), were employed to obtain the coseismic surface deformation fields along the ∼30 km length of the fault rupture. Along-track measurements from SPO and MAI techniques show a high correlation, and were subsequently used to precisely determine the location and extent of the surface fault trace. The best-fitting fault model geometry derived from an iterative inversion technique suggests that the rupture occurred on a near-vertical sinistral strike-slip fault west of the Nam Ma fault with a strike of 70°. A maximum slip of 4.2 m occurs at a depth of 2.5 km, with significant slip constrained only to the upper 10 km of the crust.

19 July 2018 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wanpeng FengWanpeng Feng
Wanpeng Feng
Sergey V. SamsonovSergey V. Samsonov
Sergey V. Samsonov
RARafael Almeida
Rafael Almeida
AYAli Yassaghi
Ali Yassaghi
JLJunhua Li
Junhua Li
WZWenjun Zheng
Wenjun Zheng
We reveal transient surface deformation following the 2017 Mw7.3 Sarpol Zahab (Iran) earthquake using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) measurements. Based on the coseismic interferograms derived from the Advanced Land Observing Satellite‐2 (ALOS‐2) data, the preferred slip model of the earthquake has a centroid depth of 14.5 ± 4 km and suggests that a basement fault is most likely responsible for the 2017 earthquake in the northwest Zagros fold‐thrust belt zone. Two slip asperities with a maximum slip of 6 m separated by 16 km are observed in the best fitting slip model. The accumulated afterslip in the first month after the mainshock determined from the Sentinel‐1 postseismic interferograms reveals a slip distribution that lies immediately updip of the coseismic slip, implying that frictional properties of the fault vary along the rupture patch. The Bamo Mount in the earthquake area was uplifted by approximately 1 m during the earthquake. We suggest that local topographic growth from both seismic and aseismic faulting behaviors is common within the Zagros fold‐thrust belt zone based on our findings regarding the 2017 earthquake and other significant events in the region.

1 August 2017 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wanpeng FengWanpeng Feng
Wanpeng Feng
ELEric Lindsey
Eric Lindsey
SBSylvain Barbot
Sylvain Barbot
Sergey V. SamsonovSergey V. Samsonov
Sergey V. Samsonov
Keren DaiKeren Dai
Keren Dai
XXXiaohua Xu
Xiaohua Xu

18 March 2022 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXu Zhang
Xu Zhang
Wanpeng FengWanpeng Feng
Wanpeng Feng
HDHailin Du
Hailin Du
Sergey V. SamsonovSergey V. Samsonov
Sergey V. Samsonov
LYLei Yi
Lei Yi

31 May 2017 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Wanpeng FengWanpeng Feng
Wanpeng Feng
Yunfeng TianYunfeng Tian
Yunfeng Tian
YZYong Zhang
Yong Zhang
SSSergey Samsonov
Sergey Samsonov
RARafael Almeida
Rafael Almeida
PLPeng Liu
Peng Liu
We use Sentinel‐1A/1B Terrain Observation with Progressive Scans (TOPS) data to map coseismic and postseismic displacements for the 25 November 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake in southwestern Xinjiang, China. Two tracks (T27 and T107) of the TOPS data captured the coseismic deformation area with a maximum line‐of‐sight deformation of ∼0.25 m in the descending track (T107). The inverted best‐fitting coseismic slip model in this study shows that the mainshock was a right‐lateral strike‐slip rupture on the western segment of the Muji fault, with an optimal dip angle of 80°±4°. Two separated slip zones exist in the coseismic slip model, with the maximum slip of 1.6 m located in the western slip zone. The total geodetic moment is 9.87×1018 N·m, equivalent to an earthquake of Mw 6.6. Our model shows that a patch between the two slip zones remained unruptured during the mainshock, indicating a potential future seismic risk. Aftershocks recorded in the first 45 days after the mainshock delineate the modeled rupture patches well. The components of the regional Global Positioning System velocities parallel to the Muji fault have been inverted to obtain an interseismic slip rate of ∼10 mm/yr on this structure. The recent large strike‐slip earthquakes in this area, that is, the 2015 Mw 7.2 Tajikistan earthquake (left‐lateral) and 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake (right‐lateral), may be an indicator of conjugate fault systems at the west boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates in response to north–south convergence produced by the collision of the two plates.