Mehmet Yilmaz

Dr. Mehmet Yilmaz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
STSenol Tonyali
Senol Tonyali
MYMehmet Yilmaz
Mehmet Yilmaz
LTLazaros Tzelves
Lazaros Tzelves
EEEsteban Emiliani
Esteban Emiliani
VCVincent De Coninck
Vincent De Coninck
AMArkadiusz Miernik
Arkadiusz Miernik
Background: The stricture-formation rate following ureteroscopy ranges from 0.5 to 5% and might amount to 24% in patients with impacted ureteral stones. The pathogenesis of ureteral stricture formation is not yet fully understood. It is likely that the patient and stone characteristics, as well as intervention factors, play a role in this process. In this systematic review, we aimed to determine the potential factors responsible for ureteral stricture formation in patients having impacted ureteral stones. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria, we conducted systematic online research through PubMed and Web of Science without a time restriction, applying the keywords “ureteral stone”, “ureteral calculus”, “impacted stone”, “ureteral stenosis”, “ureteroscopic lithotripsy”, “impacted calculus”, and “ureteral strictures” singly or in combination. Results: After eliminating non-eligible studies, we identified five articles on ureteral stricture formation following treatment of impacted ureteral stones. Ureteral perforation and/or mucosal damage appeared as key predictors of ureteral stricture following retrograde ureteroscopy (URS) for impacted ureteral stones. Besides ureteral perforation stone size, embedded stone fragments into the ureter during lithotripsy, failed URS, degree of hydronephrosis, nephrostomy tube or double-J stent (DJS)/ureter catheter insertion were also suggested factors leading to ureteral strictures. Conclusion: Ureteral perforation during surgery might be considered the main risk factor for ureteral stricture formation following retrograde ureteroscopic stone removal for impacted ureteral stones.

19 March 2020 in World Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LTLutfi Tunc
Lutfi Tunc
SYSerdar Yalcin
Serdar Yalcin
EKEngin Kaya
Engin Kaya
EGEymen Gazel
Eymen Gazel
SYSercan Yılmaz
Sercan Yılmaz
TTTheodoros Tokas
Theodoros Tokas

28 September 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMarc Fournelle
Marc Fournelle
TGTobias Grün
Tobias Grün
DSDaniel Speicher
Daniel Speicher
SWSteffen Weber
Steffen Weber
MYMehmet Yilmaz
Mehmet Yilmaz
HHHolger Hewener
Holger Hewener
We developed a new mobile ultrasound device for long-term and automated bladder monitoring without user interaction consisting of 32 transmit and receive electronics as well as a 32-element phased array 3 MHz transducer. The device architecture is based on data digitization and rapid transfer to a consumer electronics device (e.g., a tablet) for signal reconstruction (e.g., by means of plane wave compounding algorithms) and further image processing. All reconstruction algorithms are implemented in the GPU, allowing real-time reconstruction and imaging. The system and the beamforming algorithms were evaluated with respect to the imaging performance on standard sonographical phantoms (CIRS multipurpose ultrasound phantom) by analyzing the resolution, the SNR and the CNR. Furthermore, ML-based segmentation algorithms were developed and assessed with respect to their ability to reliably segment human bladders with different filling levels. A corresponding CNN was trained with 253 B-mode data sets and 20 B-mode images were evaluated. The quantitative and qualitative results of the bladder segmentation are presented and compared to the ground truth obtained by manual segmentation.

16 September 2020 in Andrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MYMehmet Yilmaz
Mehmet Yilmaz
MKMustafa Karaaslan
Mustafa Karaaslan
STSenol Tonyali
Senol Tonyali
MCMecit Celik
Mecit Celik
TTTuncay Toprak
Tuncay Toprak
OOOner Odabas
Oner Odabas

1 June 2021 in Annals of Medicine & Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GRGerd Reis
Gerd Reis
MYMehmet Yilmaz
Mehmet Yilmaz
Jason RambachJason Rambach
Jason Rambach
APAlain Pagani
Alain Pagani
RSRodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
NMNareg Minaskan
Nareg Minaskan
Mixed reality (MR), the computer-supported augmentation of a real environment with virtual elements, becomes ever more relevant in the medical domain, especially in urology, ranging from education and training over surgeries. We aimed to review existing MR technologies and their applications in urology. A non-systematic review of current literature was performed using the PubMed-Medline database using the medical subject headings (MeSH) term “mixed reality”, combined with one of the following terms: “virtual reality”, “augmented reality”, ‘’urology’’ and “augmented virtuality”. The relevant studies were utilized. MR applications such as MR guided systems, immersive VR headsets, AR models, MR-simulated ureteroscopy and smart glasses have enormous potential in education, training and surgical interventions of urology. Medical students, urology residents and inexperienced urologists can gain experience thanks to MR technologies. MR applications are also used in patient education before interventions. For surgical support, the achievable accuracy is often not sufficient. The main challenges are the non-rigid nature of the genitourinary organs, intraoperative data acquisition, online and multimodal registration and calibration of devices. However, the progress made in recent years is tremendous in all respects and the gap is constantly shrinking.

1 January 2023 in The World Journal of Men's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ashok AgarwalAshok Agarwal
Ashok Agarwal
AFAla’a Farkouh
Ala’a Farkouh
Ramadan SalehRamadan Saleh
Ramadan Saleh
THTaha Hamoda
Taha Hamoda
AHAhmed M. Harraz
Ahmed M. Harraz
GFGlobal Andrology Forum
Global Andrology Forum
Agarwal A, et al. World J Mens Health. 2023 Apr;41:e43. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.220282