Barbara Lubelli

Dr. Barbara Lubelli

Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, QLD 4059 Delft, The Netherlands

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2022 in The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFatemeh Hedieh Arfa
Fatemeh Hedieh Arfa
HZHielkje Zijlstra
Hielkje Zijlstra
BLBarbara Lubelli
Barbara Lubelli
WQWido Quist
Wido Quist
The Adaptive Reuse (AR) of heritage buildings is a complex process, which aims to preserve the values of heritage buildings while adapting them for use in the present and transferring them to the future. This paper aims to identify steps in this process and develop a structured model. The model is an ‘ideal’, it needs validation in practice; however, it is expected that following this model can help to preserve and conserve the values of heritage buildings. To come to an overview of the process and to identify its main steps, a literature review at an international level has been conducted. The analysis of the literature revealed that the AR process as a whole in relation to heritage buildings has not been widely studied. Based on the results of this review, a conceptual model representing the AR process of heritage buildings has been defined. This model consists of 10 steps: ‘initiative’, ‘analysis of heritage buildings’, ‘value assessment, ‘mapping level of significance’, ‘definition of adaptive reuse potential’, ‘definition of design strategy’, ‘final decision-making’, ‘execution’, ‘maintenance’, and ‘evaluation after years’. This model can act as a comprehensive theoretical basis for further studies on the AR process of heritage buildings.

5 April 2018 in Materials and Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BLBarbara Lubelli
Barbara Lubelli
Veerle CnuddeVeerle Cnudde
Veerle Cnudde
TDTeresa Diaz-Goncalves
Teresa Diaz-Goncalves
Elisa FranzoniElisa Franzoni
Elisa Franzoni
RHRob P. J. van Hees
Rob P. J. van Hees
HVHeather Viles
Heather Viles
The durability of building materials with respect to salt crystallization is commonly determined by accelerated weathering tests, carried out in the laboratory. An effective laboratory weathering test should assess the durability and, in the case of conservation of historic buildings, the compatibility of repair materials with those existing. Besides, the test should provide reliable results within a reasonable period of time, accelerating the deterioration process without however altering its mechanism. Despite several national and international standards, recommendations and guidelines, a commonly accepted testing protocol does not yet exist. Researchers often develop and apply their own procedure, a fact that complicates comparison between different studies. The RILEM Technical Committee 271 ASC has been set up with the scope of developing improved test procedures for the assessment of the behaviour of materials under the influence of salt crystallization, which should overcome the limitations of existing standards and recommendations. This paper constitutes one of the first results of the work of the Technical Committee. It critically reviews the literature on salt crystallization tests, identifies advantages and limitations of the several test protocols and provides new ideas for the development of improved salt crystallization procedures.

31 December 2017 in RILEM Technical Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRobert Flatt
Robert Flatt
NANevin Aly
Nevin Aly
FCFrancesco Caruso
Francesco Caruso
HDHannelore Derluyn
Hannelore Derluyn
JDJulie Desarnaud
Julie Desarnaud
MSMichael Steiger
Michael Steiger
Salt crystallization is accepted to represent one of the major causes for the degradation of building and ornamental stone. As such, it has attracted the attention of researchers, who over the years have progressively unraveled most mechanisms involved in salt damage. Despite this, many questions subsist about how to quantitatively predict damage or its progression, and in particular how to relate performance on site to that in laboratory tests. In this context, a new RILEM TC has been started with the objective of defining laboratory tests that deliver more reliable predictions of field behavior. One deliverable of this TC, is to provide a theoretical insight into this question based on recent progress on the understanding of salt damage. This paper presents a summary of this work, highlighting key aspects relating to crystallization pressure, chemo-mechanics and transport. Implications are more specifically discussed in relation to existing accelerated tests in an attempt to better define the type of field exposure that they may best represent. A simple conceptual model for the development of salt damage is introduced. During an initial “induction” phase, transport of ions and accumulation of salt in the porous materials occurs without causing detectable damage until a critical point, termed “damage onset” is reached. Beyond this point, during the “propagation phase”, the material degrades increasingly. The implications of these two phases are discussed in relation to the selection of appropriate salt weathering tests and conservation interventions.

1 July 2017 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGiovanni Borsoi
Giovanni Borsoi
BLBarbara Lubelli
Barbara Lubelli
RHRob van Hees
Rob van Hees
RVRosário Veiga
Rosário Veiga
ASAntónio Santos Silva
António Santos Silva

1 March 2004 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBarbara Lubelli
Barbara Lubelli
RHRob P.J. van Hees
Rob P.J. van Hees
CGCaspar J.W.P. Groot
Caspar J.W.P. Groot

1 March 2016 in Journal of Cultural Heritage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGiovanni Borsoi
Giovanni Borsoi
BLBarbara Lubelli
Barbara Lubelli
RHRob van Hees
Rob van Hees
Maria Rosario do Rosário da Silva VeigaMaria Rosario do Rosário da Silva Veiga
Maria Rosario do Rosário da Silva Veiga
ASAntónio Santos Silva
António Santos Silva