Carlos Alberto Silva

Dr. Carlos Alberto Silva

1. Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA; 2. School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 January 2022 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LDLaura Duncanson
Laura Duncanson
JKJames R. Kellner
James R. Kellner
JAJohn Armston
John Armston
RDRalph Dubayah
Ralph Dubayah
DMDavid M. Minor
David M. Minor
CZCarlo Zgraggen
Carlo Zgraggen

11 September 2017 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Midhun MohanMidhun Mohan
Midhun Mohan
Carlos Alberto SilvaCarlos Alberto Silva
Carlos Alberto Silva
Carine KlaubergCarine Klauberg
Carine Klauberg
PJPrahlad Jat
Prahlad Jat
GCGlenn Catts
Glenn Catts
MDMahendra Dia
Mahendra Dia
Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology and data processing capabilities have made it feasible to obtain high-resolution imagery and three dimensional (3D) data which can be used for forest monitoring and assessing tree attributes. This study evaluates the applicability of low consumer grade cameras attached to UAVs and structure-from-motion (SfM) algorithm for automatic individual tree detection (ITD) using a local-maxima based algorithm on UAV-derived Canopy Height Models (CHMs). This study was conducted in a private forest at Cache Creek located east of Jackson city, Wyoming. Based on the UAV-imagery, we allocated 30 field plots of 20 m × 20 m. For each plot, the number of trees was counted manually using the UAV-derived orthomosaic for reference. A total of 367 reference trees were counted as part of this study and the algorithm detected 312 trees resulting in an accuracy higher than 85% (F-score of 0.86). Overall, the algorithm missed 55 trees (omission errors), and falsely detected 46 trees (commission errors) resulting in a total count of 358 trees. We further determined the impact of fixed tree window sizes (FWS) and fixed smoothing window sizes (SWS) on the ITD accuracy, and detected an inverse relationship between tree density and FWS. From our results, it can be concluded that ITD can be performed with an acceptable accuracy (F > 0.80) from UAV-derived CHMs in an open canopy forest, and has the potential to supplement future research directed towards estimation of above ground biomass and stem volume from UAV-imagery.

11 July 2016 in Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Carlos Alberto SilvaCarlos Alberto Silva
Carlos Alberto Silva
AHAndrew T. Hudak
Andrew T. Hudak
LVLee A. Vierling
Lee A. Vierling
ELE. Louise Loudermilk
E. Louise Loudermilk
JOJoseph J. O’brien
Joseph J. O’brien
AKAnahita Khosravipour
Anahita Khosravipour
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has demonstrated potential for forest inventory at the individual-tree level. The aim in this study was to predict individual-tree height (Ht; m), basal area (BA; m2), and stem volume (V; m3) attributes, imputing Random Forest k-nearest neighbor (RF k-NN) and individual-tree-level-based metrics extracted from a LiDAR-derived canopy height model (CHM) in a longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) forest in southwestern Georgia, United States. We developed a new framework for modeling tree-level forest attributes that comprise 3 steps: (i) individual tree detection, crown delineation, and tree-level-based metrics computation from LiDAR-derived CHM; (ii) automatic matching of LiDAR-derived trees and field-based trees for a regression modeling step using a novel algorithm; and (iii) RF k-NN imputation modeling for estimating tree-level Ht, BA, and V and subsequent summarization of these metrics at the plot and stand levels. RMSDs for tree-level Ht, BA, and V were 2.96%, 58.62%, and 8.19%, respectively. Although BA estimation accuracy was poor because of the longleaf pine growth habitat, individual-tree locations, Ht, and V were estimated with high accuracy, especially in low-canopy-cover conditions. Future efforts based on the findings could help improve the estimation accuracy of individual-tree-level attributes such as BA.

1 February 2021 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Carlos Alberto SilvaCarlos Alberto Silva
Carlos Alberto Silva
LDLaura Duncanson
Laura Duncanson
SHSteven Hancock
Steven Hancock
ANAmy Neuenschwander
Amy Neuenschwander
NTNathan Thomas
Nathan Thomas
RDRalph Dubayah
Ralph Dubayah

1 October 2021 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADanilo Roberti Alves de Almeida
Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida
EBEben North Broadbent
Eben North Broadbent
MFMatheus Pinheiro Ferreira
Matheus Pinheiro Ferreira
PMPaula Meli
Paula Meli
AZAngelica Maria Almeyda Zambrano
Angelica Maria Almeyda Zambrano
PBPedro H.S. Brancalion
Pedro H.S. Brancalion

2 October 2020 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Celso H. L. Silva-JuniorCelso H. L. Silva-Junior
Celso H. L. Silva-Junior
Luiz AragaoLuiz Aragao
Luiz Aragao
Liana AndersonLiana Anderson
Liana Anderson
MFMarisa Fonseca
Marisa Fonseca
YSYosio Edemir Shimabukuro
Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro
Sassan SaatchiSassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi
Deforestation is the primary driver of carbon losses in tropical forests, but it does not operate alone. Forest fragmentation, a resulting feature of the deforestation process, promotes indirect carbon losses induced by edge effect. This process is not implicitly considered by policies for reducing carbon emissions in the tropics. Here, we used a remote sensing approach to estimate carbon losses driven by edge effect in Amazonia over the 2001 to 2015 period. We found that carbon losses associated with edge effect (947 Tg C) corresponded to one-third of losses from deforestation (2592 Tg C). Despite a notable negative trend of 7 Tg C year−1 in carbon losses from deforestation, the carbon losses from edge effect remained unchanged, with an average of 63 ± 8 Tg C year−1. Carbon losses caused by edge effect is thus an additional unquantified flux that can counteract carbon emissions avoided by reducing deforestation, compromising the Paris Agreement’s bold targets.