Esmeralda Minguijon

Dr. Esmeralda Minguijon


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 April 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IPIevgenia Pastushenko
Ievgenia Pastushenko
ABAudrey Brisebarre
Audrey Brisebarre
ASAlejandro Sifrim
Alejandro Sifrim
MFMarco Fioramonti
Marco Fioramonti
TRTatiana Revenco
Tatiana Revenco
CBCédric Blanpain
Cédric Blanpain

14 September 2011 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJoseba M. Garrido
Joseba M. Garrido
ISIker A. Sevilla
Iker A. Sevilla
BBBeatriz Beltrán-Beck
Beatriz Beltrán-Beck
EMEsmeralda Minguijon
Esmeralda Minguijon
CBCristina Ballesteros
Cristina Ballesteros
CGChristian Gortázar
Christian Gortázar
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium bovis and closely related members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex continues to affect humans and animals worldwide and its control requires vaccination of wildlife reservoir species such as Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vaccination efforts for TB control in wildlife have been based primarily on oral live BCG formulations. However, this is the first report of the use of oral inactivated vaccines for controlling TB in wildlife. In this study, four groups of 5 wild boar each were vaccinated with inactivated M. bovis by the oral and intramuscular routes, vaccinated with oral BCG or left unvaccinated as controls. All groups were later challenged with a field strain of M. bovis. The results of the IFN-gamma response, serum antibody levels, M. bovis culture, TB lesion scores, and the expression of C3 and MUT genes were compared between these four groups. The results suggested that vaccination with heat-inactivated M. bovis or BCG protect wild boar from TB. These results also encouraged testing combinations of BCG and inactivated M. bovis to vaccinate wild boar against TB. Vaccine formulations using heat-inactivated M. bovis for TB control in wildlife would have the advantage of being environmentally safe and more stable under field conditions when compared to live BCG vaccines. The antibody response and MUT expression levels can help differentiating between vaccinated and infected wild boar and as correlates of protective response in vaccinated animals. These results suggest that vaccine studies in free-living wild boar are now possible to reveal the full potential of protecting against TB using oral M. bovis inactivated and BCG vaccines.

1 December 2015 in Veterinary Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEsmeralda Minguijon
Esmeralda Minguijon
RRRamsés Reina
Ramsés Reina
MPM. Pérez
M. Pérez
LPL. Polledo
L. Polledo
MVM. Villoria
M. Villoria
RJRamón A Juste
Ramón A Juste

1 November 2009 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBC. Ballesteros
C. Ballesteros
JGJ.M. Garrido
J.M. Garrido
JVJ. Vicente
J. Vicente
BMBeatriz Romero Martinez
Beatriz Romero Martinez
RGR.C. Galindo
R.C. Galindo
CGChristian Gortázar
Christian Gortázar

19 May 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BBBeatriz Beltrán-Beck
Beatriz Beltrán-Beck
Jose De La FuenteJose De La Fuente
Jose De La Fuente
JGJoseba M Garrido
Joseba M Garrido
AAAlicia Aranaz
Alicia Aranaz
ISIker A. Sevilla
Iker A. Sevilla
CGChristian Gortázar
Christian Gortázar
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a pandemic affecting billions of people worldwide, thus stressing the need for new vaccines. Defining the correlates of vaccine protection is essential to achieve this goal. In this study, we used the wild boar model for mycobacterial infection and TB to characterize the protective mechanisms elicited by a new heat inactivated Mycobacterium bovis vaccine (IV). Oral vaccination with the IV resulted in significantly lower culture and lesion scores, particularly in the thorax, suggesting that the IV might provide a novel vaccine for TB control with special impact on the prevention of pulmonary disease, which is one of the limitations of current vaccines. Oral vaccination with the IV induced an adaptive antibody response and activation of the innate immune response including the complement component C3 and inflammasome. Mycobacterial DNA/RNA was not involved in inflammasome activation but increased C3 production by a still unknown mechanism. The results also suggested a protective mechanism mediated by the activation of IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells by MHC I antigen presenting dendritic cells (DCs) in response to vaccination with the IV, without a clear role for Th1 CD4+ T cells. These results support a role for DCs in triggering the immune response to the IV through a mechanism similar to the phagocyte response to PAMPs with a central role for C3 in protection against mycobacterial infection. Higher C3 levels may allow increased opsonophagocytosis and effective bacterial clearance, while interfering with CR3-mediated opsonic and nonopsonic phagocytosis of mycobacteria, a process that could be enhanced by specific antibodies against mycobacterial proteins induced by vaccination with the IV. These results suggest that the IV acts through novel mechanisms to protect against TB in wild boar.

1 February 1998 in Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AOAurora Ortı́n
Aurora Ortı́n
EMEsmeralda Minguijon
Esmeralda Minguijon
PDPatricia Dewar
Patricia Dewar
MGMercedes Garcı́a
Mercedes Garcı́a
LFLuis Miguel Ferrer
Luis Miguel Ferrer
MHMarcelo De Las Heras
Marcelo De Las Heras