Hauke Ferdinand Deeken

Mr. Hauke Ferdinand Deeken

Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlexander Schmithausen
Alexander Schmithausen
HDHauke Ferdinand Deeken
Hauke Ferdinand Deeken
KGKatrin Gerlach
Katrin Gerlach
MTManfred Trimborn
Manfred Trimborn
KWKirsten Weiß
Kirsten Weiß
CMChristian Maack
Christian Maack

1 December 2020 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKManuel S. Krommweh
Manuel S. Krommweh
ASAlexander Schmithausen
Alexander Schmithausen
HDHauke Ferdinand Deeken
Hauke Ferdinand Deeken
Wolfgang BuescherWolfgang Buescher
Wolfgang Buescher
GMGerd-Christian Maack
Gerd-Christian Maack

1 July 2021 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGuilin Shan
Guilin Shan
CMChristian Maack
Christian Maack
Wolfgang BuescherWolfgang Buescher
Wolfgang Buescher
GGGereon Glenz
Gereon Glenz
AMAndreas Milimonka
Andreas Milimonka
YSYurui Sun
Yurui Sun

13 September 2024 in Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HDHauke Ferdinand Deeken
Hauke Ferdinand Deeken
WBWolfgang Büscher
Wolfgang Büscher
MTManfred Trimborn
Manfred Trimborn
ASAlexander J. Schmithausen
Alexander J. Schmithausen
KWKirsten Weiß
Kirsten Weiß
GMGerd-Christian Maack
Gerd-Christian Maack
Background: Silage emits climate- and environment-relevant gases during fermentation and feed-out periods. This trial aimed to determine the unknown carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide, ethanol, and ethyl acetate emissions of constant maize silage material over both periods. The results will be published in two consecutive articles (Part A: anaerobic fermentation period, Part B: aerobic storage period). Methods: The untreated control (CON) was compared with the chemical additive treatment (CHE; 0.5 g sodium benzoate and 0.3 g potassium sorbate per kg fresh matter) and the biological additive treatment (BIO; 108 colony-forming units (CFU) Lentilactobacillus buchneri and 107 CFU Lactiplantibacillus plantarum per kg fresh matter). Barrel silos (n = 4) were connected to gas bags to quantify gas formation during anaerobic fermentation (30 or 135 ensiling days). Glass jar silos (n = 12) were used for laboratory silage analysis. Results: CHE produced significantly (p < 0.05) less gas (6.7 ± 0.3 L per kg dry matter ensiled material (kgDM) until ensiling day 14.0 ± 0.0) and ethanol (8.6 ± 1.5 mg kgDM–1) than CON did (8.5 ± 0.2 L kgDM–1 until ensiling day 19.5 ± 6.4; 12.2 ± 1.5 (mg ethanol) kgDM–1). BIO indicates prolonged gas formation (9.1 ± 0.9 L kgDM–1 until ensiling day 61.3 ± 51.9; 12.0 ± 2.1 mg kgDM–1). CO2 is the main component of the gas formed. All treatments formed methane and nitrous oxide in small quantities. CON emitted significantly more CO2eq emissions than BIO and less than CHE (p < 0.05). Additives had no effect on ethyl acetate gas emissions. For BIO, ethanol concentrations in the material (rS = 0.609, p < 0.05) and gas quantities (rS = 0.691, p < 0.05) correlate with ethyl acetate gas quantities. All the treatments exhibited decreasing gas and CO2 quantities, and the dry matter mass increased between ensiling days 14 and 30 (− 0.810 ≤ rS ≤ 0.442; p < 0.05 to p = 0.20). Conclusion: Silage generates climate- and environmental-relevant gases during fermentation and silage additives affect this pattern. Gas formation exceeds the fixation potential, and the carbon footprint of silage fermentation is negative. Graphical

10 October 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKManuel S. Krommweh
Manuel S. Krommweh
HDHauke Ferdinand Deeken
Hauke Ferdinand Deeken
HLHannah Licharz
Hannah Licharz
Wolfgang BuescherWolfgang Buescher
Wolfgang Buescher
In this study, biological exhaust air treatment was combined with a recuperative heat exchanger in one process stage. The aim of this plant development and testing is not only to reduce ammonia from the exhaust air of pig houses but also to recover thermal energy at the same time. This is intended to offset the high operating costs of exhaust air treatment with savings of heating costs in cold seasons and to use the plant more efficiently. This system was tested for the first time under practical conditions in a pig fattening house in southern Germany. Three different assembly situations of the heat exchanger were examined for 13 days each and then compared with each other. The heating performance of the plant is primarily dependent on the outside air temperature and secondarily on the scrubbing water temperature. Depending on the assembly situation of the heat exchanger, an average heating performance of between 6.0 and 10.0 kW was observed; the amount of recovered thermal energy was between 1860 and 3132 kWh. The coefficient of performance (COP) ranked between 7.1 and 11.5. Furthermore, ammonia removal up to 64% was demonstrated. A long-term investigation of the system under practical conditions is recommended to validate the data collected in this study.

11 February 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HDHauke Ferdinand Deeken
Hauke Ferdinand Deeken
ALAlexandra Lengling
Alexandra Lengling
MKManuel S. Krommweh
Manuel S. Krommweh
Wolfgang BuescherWolfgang Buescher
Wolfgang Buescher
Pig farming in mechanically ventilated barns requires much electricity for ventilation or exhaust air purification. Furthermore, thermal energy is needed to fulfill the animals’ temperature requirements, especially in piglet rearing. Electrical and thermal energy input leads to CO2 emissions and operating costs. Up to 90% of heat losses are due to the exhausted air. Heat exchangers can recover thermal energy from the warm exhaust air and transfer it to the cold fresh air. This study aimed to investigate energy consumption, efficiency, CO2 emissions, and energy costs when using heat exchangers in a German piglet rearing barn under practical conditions in combination with exhaust air purification. The following parameters were obtained for a two-year period: air temperatures, air flow rates, and electricity and liquefied natural gas consumption; the latter were used to calculate CO2 emissions and energy costs. In total, 576,042 kWhel,th and 616,893 kWhel,th (years 1 and 2) of energy were provided, including 290,414 kWhth and 317,913 kWhth of thermal energy recovered. Using heat exchangers reduced CO2 emissions by up to 37.5% and energy costs by up to 19.7% per year. The study shows that piglet rearing can increase its ecological and environmental sustainability by using heat recovery.