Andrea Marescotti

Dr. Andrea Marescotti


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in World Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGiovanni Belletti
Giovanni Belletti
AMAndrea Marescotti
Andrea Marescotti
JTJean-Marc Touzard
Jean-Marc Touzard

1 January 2007 in Journal of Rural Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAngela Tregear
Angela Tregear
FAFilippo Arfini
Filippo Arfini
GBGiovanni Belletti
Giovanni Belletti
AMAndrea Marescotti
Andrea Marescotti

1 November 2016 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XQXiomara Quinones-Ruiz
Xiomara Quinones-Ruiz
Marianne PenkerMarianne Penker
Marianne Penker
GBGiovanni Belletti
Giovanni Belletti
AMAndrea Marescotti
Andrea Marescotti
Silvia ScaramuzziSilvia Scaramuzzi
Silvia Scaramuzzi
LSLuis Samper
Luis Samper

1 January 2011
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
GBGiovanni Belletti
Giovanni Belletti
AMAndrea Marescotti
Andrea Marescotti
In order to explore the contributions of origin products (OPs) to rural development, this chapter first conceptualizes both origin products (OPs) and...

27 April 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAndrea Marescotti
Andrea Marescotti
XQXiomara Quinones-Ruiz
Xiomara Quinones-Ruiz
HEHanna Edelmann
Hanna Edelmann
GBGiovanni Belletti
Giovanni Belletti
KBKristina Broscha
Kristina Broscha
Silvia ScaramuzziSilvia Scaramuzzi
Silvia Scaramuzzi
Protected designations of origin (PDO) and Protected geographical indications (PGI) in the European Union have been recognized through a sound legal framework for more than three decades. We are recently witnessing an increased number of amendments to the product specifications of registered PDO/PGI. This paper aims to understand how PDO/PGI for the fruit and vegetables product class have evolved. Until 31 December 2018, there were 379 PDO/PGI registered under the fruit and vegetables product class and 81 amendments approved. We designed a coding guideline to: (i) analyze all the amendments to the product specifications; (ii) identify the type of rules that were modified; (iii) find out whether the amendments resulted in more flexible or more restrictive rules, and (iv) the respective justifications given by producers. We designed a database to manage all the information. Overall, amendments brought more flexible rules (particularly in Italy and Spain), while France showed a more diversified situation. Concerning the justifications stated by producers for amending the product specification, market changes, available new technology, and strengthening product quality were the most important, while environmental concerns were less relevant. Then, we in-depth analyzed the amendments that were explicitly justified with environmental reasons. The analysis showed only a light movement towards more environment-friendly rules, although environmental justifications were often used “indirectly”, as a means to achieve better marketing competitiveness, meeting new market demand and reducing production costs. These results seem consistent with previous studies, which indicated market forces as a primary motivation to amend product specifications.

31 July 2018 in British Food Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XQXiomara Quinones-Ruiz
Xiomara Quinones-Ruiz
HFHanna Forster
Hanna Forster
Marianne PenkerMarianne Penker
Marianne Penker
GBGiovanni Belletti
Giovanni Belletti
AMAndrea Marescotti
Andrea Marescotti
CAChristine Altenbuchner
Christine Altenbuchner
Purpose: The protection of Geographical Indications (GIs) supports producers to define common quality standards while highlighting the geographical origin of food products with specific qualities. Adaptations of quality standards are driven by international competition, new production technologies or environmental change. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the modifications affecting European Union (EU) Protected Designation of Origin-Protected Geographical Indication. It specifically compares the share of amendments in diverse product class, years and countries, illustrates specific cases and identifies the factors explaining the probability to amend product specifications. Design/methodology/approach: Official documents of the DOOR Database provide the material for an analysis of changes in product specifications. They also supply the data for four illustrative cheese cases and a logistic regression of all EU amendments. Findings: Amendments of GI product specifications are very frequent: 17 per cent of all 1,276 EU GIs had at least one amendment. This happens in particular for processed products (42 per cent more often than for unprocessed ones) and specific countries (GIs in Italy are six times, Spain five times and France four times more likely to have an amendment compared to GIs from other EU countries). As illustrated by contrasting cheese amendments, the diverse modifications in the product specifications range from more flexibility and innovation on the one hand to stricter rules for strengthening the product’s identity on the other hand. Originality/value: For EU and national authorities, GI producers and scholars, this first systematic EU-wide analysis of amendments demonstrates that protected food GIs have to be conceptualised as evolving institutions and not as statically protected food production systems.