The reliability of DeepL Translator (DeepL GmbH, Cologne, Germany) for the translation for medical articles has not been verified yet. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of machine translation from Japanese to English for a medical article using the DeepL Translator. The subject of this study was an English-language medical article translated from Japanese, which had already been published. The original Japanese manuscript was translated into English using DeepL Translator. The translated English article was then back-translated into Japanese by three researchers. In turn, three other researchers compared the back-translated Japanese sentences with the original Japanese manuscript and calculated the percentage of sentences that retained the intended meaning. The mean ± standard deviation of the match rate for the entire article was 94.0 ± 2.9%. The match rate in the Results section was significantly higher than that in the other sections; while the match rate in the Materials and Methods section was significantly lower than the rate in the other sections. Compound sentences and sentences with an unclear subject and predicate appeared to be significant predictors for mismatched translation. The translation for a medical article from Japanese to English was performed accurately by DeepL Translator.

Article Citation: Yuko Nakayama, Shinichi Minohara, Tetsuo Nonaka, Takuma Nomiya, Yohsuke Kusano, Eri Takeshita, Nobutaka Mizoguchi, and Yasuhito Hagiwara (2015) The Ion-Beam Radiation Oncology Center in Kanagawa (i-ROCK) Carbon Ion Facility at the Kanagawa Cancer Center. International Journal of Particle Therapy: Winter 2016, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 478-480. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-15-00024.1

Background: The standard treatment for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck is surgical resection followed by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Currently, definitive radiotherapy (defRT) is considered an inadequate treatment; however, its data are based on studies using classical radiotherapy techniques. Therefore, the therapeutic effects of current radiotherapy techniques have not been adequately evaluated, and it may have underestimated the efficacy of defRT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44 adenoid cystic carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy based on modern treatment techniques from 1993 to 2017. Results: Twenty-four patients underwent PORT and 20 patients underwent defRT. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients treated with PORT and defRT were 85.3% and 79.7%, respectively. The 5-year local control rates were 82.5% and 83.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall survival and local control of patients treated with PORT and defRT (p = 0.4392 and p = 0.0904, respectively). Conclusion: Our results show that defRT is comparable to surgical resection followed by PORT with respect to overall survival and local control. The results suggest that defRT can be an effective treatment option for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck.

The development of new treatment strategies to improve the prognosis of mucosal malignant melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) after carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is essential because of the risk of distant metastases. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment to justify its inclusion in the regimen after CIRT. Thirty-four patients who received CIRT as an initial treatment were included in the analysis and stratified into three groups: those who did not receive ICIs (Group A), those who received ICIs after recurrence or metastasis (Group B), and those who received ICIs as adjuvant therapy after CIRT (Group C). In total, 62% of the patients (n = 21) received ICIs. The 2-year local control and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 90.0% and 66.8%, respectively. The 2-year OS rates for patients in Groups A, B, and C were 50.8%, 66.7%, and 100%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between Groups A and B (p = 0.192) and Groups B and C (p = 0.112). However, a significant difference was confirmed between Groups A and C (p = 0.017). Adjuvant therapy following CIRT for MMHN may be a promising treatment modality that can extend patient survival.

Background/Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution between scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy (sCIRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT-SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients with early-stage NSCLC who underwent sCIRT at Kanagawa Cancer Center between 2018-2020 were enrolled. Dose-volume histogram parameters of the planned target volume and normal organs for sCIRT and VMAT-SBRT were evaluated. Results: The homogeneity index of the target volume of sCIRT was significantly lower than that of VMAT-SBRT. The dose of sCIRT was significantly lower than that of VMAT-SBRT at low volumes in the lung, heart, spinal cord, and esophagus. Conclusion: The dose distribution of sCIRT for early-stage NSCLC was better than that of VMAT-SBRT.