The 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Summit in Warsaw focused on the digital transformation of arrhythmia management, convening over 130 stakeholders from academia, industry, and policy. This review summarises the current state (in 2025) and future directions of digital health in arrhythmia care, including remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), mobile health (mHealth), artificial intelligence (AI), and integration into the European Health Data Space (EHDS). RM has become central to CIED follow-up, improving outcomes and reducing healthcare use. However, challenges in reimbursement, workforce adaptation, and data interoperability persist. The absence of standardised data exchange between device vendors and healthcare systems has led to initiatives like the World Forum on CIED follow-up to develop interoperability standards. mHealth tools, including apps and wearable devices, offer accurate arrhythmia detection but face regulatory, digital literacy, and privacy barriers. The EHDS aims to enable cross-border data sharing for personalised care and real-world research, though implementation must address ethical, legal, and infrastructural issues. AI shows promise in prediction, monitoring, and data integration, but lacks standardised, transparent validation. The ESC-EHRA Atlas in Heart Rhythm Disorders supports structured data collection to harmonize and benchmark care across Europe. Overall, digital innovations, if coupled with regulatory alignment, interoperability standards, and equitable access, have the potential to shift arrhythmia management toward a more predictive, personalized, and efficient model of care.

Thromboembolism is the most serious complication of AF, and oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy. Current guidelines place all AF types together in terms of anticoagulation with the major determinants being associated comorbidities translated into risk marker. Among patients in large clinical trials, those with non-paroxysmal AF appear to be at higher risk of stroke than those with paroxysmal AF. Higher complexity of the AF pattern is also associated with higher risk of mortality. Moreover, continuous monitoring of AF through cardiac implantable devices provided us with the concept of ‘AF burden’. Usually, the larger the AF burden, the higher the risk of stroke; however, the relationship is not well characterised with respect to the threshold value above which the risk increases. The picture is more complex than it appears: AF and underlying disorders must act synergically respecting the magnitude of its own characteristics, which are the amount of time a patient stays in AF and the severity of associated comorbidities.

A previous randomized study demonstrated that the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) was noninferior to transvenous ICD with respect to device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. However, that was performed prior to the widespread adoption of pulse generator implantation in the intermuscular (IM) space instead of the traditional subcutaneous (SC) pocket. The aim of this analysis was to compare survival from device-related complications and inappropriate shocks between patients who underwent S-ICD implantation with the generator positioned in an IM position in comparison with an SC pocket. We analysed 1577 consecutive patients who had undergone S-ICD implantation from 2013 to 2021 and were followed up until December 2021. Subcutaneous patients (n = 290) were propensity matched with patients of the IM group (n = 290), and their outcomes were compared. : During a median follow-up of 28 months, device-related complications were reported in 28 (4.8%) patients and inappropriate shocks were reported in 37 (6.4%) patients. The risk of complication was lower in the matched IM group than in the SC group [hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–0.99, P = 0.041], as well as the composite of complications and inappropriate shocks (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.86, P = 0.013). The risk of appropriate shocks was similar between groups (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.50–1.61, P = 0.721). There was no significant interaction between generator positioning and variables such as gender, age, body mass index, and ejection fraction. Our data showed the superiority of the IM S-ICD generator positioning in reducing device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02275637.

Patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies are usually younger and have a predominantly arrhythmia-related prognosis; they have nearly normal life expectancy thanks to the protection against sudden cardiac death provided by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is an effective alternative to the transvenous ICD and has evolved over the years. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of inappropriate shocks (IS), appropriate therapies, and device-related complications in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies who underwent modern S-ICD implantation. We enrolled consecutive patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies who had undergone implantation of a modern S-ICD from January 2016 to December 2020 and who were followed up until December 2022. A total of 1338 S-ICD implantations were performed within the observation period. Of these patients, 628 had cardiomyopathies or channelopathies. The rate of IS at 12 months was 4.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8–6.9] in patients with cardiomyopathies and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1–3.8) in patients with channelopathies (P = 0.032). No significant differences were noted over a median follow-up of 43 months [hazard ratio (HR): 0.76; 95% CI: 0.45–1.31; P = 0.351]. The rate of appropriate shocks at 12 months was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.1–4.1) in patients with cardiomyopathies and 2.1% (95% CI: 0.6–5.3) in patients with channelopathies (P = 1.0). The rate of device-related complications was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3–2.3) and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.2–6.8), respectively (P = 0.074). No significant differences were noted over the entire follow-up. The need for pacing was low, occurring in 0.8% of patients. Modern S-ICDs may be a valuable alternative to transvenous ICDs in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. Our findings suggest that modern S-ICD therapy carries a low rate of IS. URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT02275637.