Esophageal anastomotic fistula (AF) is a frequent and severe complication of an esophagectomy due to esophageal or eso-gastric junction cancer, regardless of the selected surgical technique. AF is usually treated by endoscopic stent placement. Objectives: This study aims to examine the efficacy of stents in the treatment of AF, analyzing the healing period and the factors that contribute to its delay. Methods: We collected data from 55 patients who underwent stent implantation for AF, and analyzed multiple variables related to patient healing time and surgical technique with two primary endpoints: post-stenting hospital stay and the time of stent usage until fistula closure. The patients were divided into three groups based on the anastomosis type (eso-gastric anastomosis, eso-gastric cervical anastomosis and eso-jejunal anastomosis) and they were compared using the primary endpoints. Results: Our findings show the differences between the three groups, with a longer hospital stay for eso-gastric anastomosis, and an extended time of fistula closure in the case of eso-gastric cervical anastomosis. We also found a significant correlation between the size of the fistula and the hospital stay (R = 0.4, p < 0.01). Regarding patients’ risk factors, our results show an extended post-stenting hospital stay for those patients that underwent preoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions: Our results offer an extended view of the efficiency, hospitalization duration and healing time for esophageal anastomotic fistula, and reveal some of the factors that interfere with its resolution.

Goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCAs) are an exceedingly rare subtype of tumors, almost exclusively occurring in the appendix, and characterized by features overlapping both adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which has historically led to confusion and varied nomenclature. This study presents a comprehensive review of the literature highlighting particularities of this type of malignancy, starting from a rare case of a 54-year-old female operated on in our clinic for an appendiceal tumor, initially suspected to be a mucinous neoplasm based on colonoscopic biopsy, which was ultimately confirmed to be goblet cell adenocarcinoma on both intraoperative frozen section and definitive pathological examination. Exhibiting signs and symptoms associated with an abdominal mass, she underwent a right hemicolectomy with partial omentectomy for locally advanced, high-grade, invasive goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix with lymphatic macro metastases and epiploic invasion, categorized as AJCC stage IVb carcinomatosis. The patient received FOLFOX adjuvant. Six months later, she required reoperation due to the progression of carcinomatosis, which was again confirmed histopathologically. A second-line oncological protocol comprising irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab was initiated. Given the rarity of GCAs and the absence of a consensus on nomenclature, classification, and diagnostic criteria, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to highlight current trends related to this entity, including its classification within different systems (Tang, Yozu, WHO, AJCC), as well as the therapeutic surgical approaches—ranging from simple appendectomy to extensive multiorgan resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the use of systemic therapy. Adhering to these recommendations will enhance communication among pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists regarding the natural history and prognosis of this rare malignancy.