Goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCAs) are an exceedingly rare subtype of tumors, almost exclusively occurring in the appendix, and characterized by features overlapping both adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which has historically led to confusion and varied nomenclature. This study presents a comprehensive review of the literature highlighting particularities of this type of malignancy, starting from a rare case of a 54-year-old female operated on in our clinic for an appendiceal tumor, initially suspected to be a mucinous neoplasm based on colonoscopic biopsy, which was ultimately confirmed to be goblet cell adenocarcinoma on both intraoperative frozen section and definitive pathological examination. Exhibiting signs and symptoms associated with an abdominal mass, she underwent a right hemicolectomy with partial omentectomy for locally advanced, high-grade, invasive goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix with lymphatic macro metastases and epiploic invasion, categorized as AJCC stage IVb carcinomatosis. The patient received FOLFOX adjuvant. Six months later, she required reoperation due to the progression of carcinomatosis, which was again confirmed histopathologically. A second-line oncological protocol comprising irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab was initiated. Given the rarity of GCAs and the absence of a consensus on nomenclature, classification, and diagnostic criteria, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to highlight current trends related to this entity, including its classification within different systems (Tang, Yozu, WHO, AJCC), as well as the therapeutic surgical approaches—ranging from simple appendectomy to extensive multiorgan resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the use of systemic therapy. Adhering to these recommendations will enhance communication among pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists regarding the natural history and prognosis of this rare malignancy.

Traditionally, the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer has involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection, and, in some cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to present current advances and ongoing controversies in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), with a particular focus on clarifying the role of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in contemporary treatment strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in Medline/PubMed using various keyword combinations, including “rectal cancer/neoplasia” and“therapy” or “neoadjuvant therapy” or “TNT”, and included articles published between 2015 and 2025. Results: The association of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with preoperative systemic chemotherapy has led to the current concept of total neoadjuvant therapy. The advantages of preoperative chemotherapy include better patient compliance, a decrease in the rate of local recurrence and distant metastases via the early destruction of infra-clinical micrometastases, and higher rates of pathological complete response. All of these have led to the inclusion of this strategy in treatment guidelines for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusions: However, the selection of patients with advanced rectal tumors for optimal therapy requires comprehensive imaging assessments, molecular and genetic testing, and a multidisciplinary team to determine the most appropriate total neoadjuvant therapy approach.

Chylothorax is a rare complication, especially after esophageal cancer surgery It may occur mainly in the thoracic stage of esophagectomy. The management of chylothorax is usually conservative, surgical reoperation with thoracic duct ligation being reserved for those cases refractory to that treatment. We discuss issues of diagnosis and therapeutic attitude, as evidenced by the literature, although a general consensus has not been established, most likely due to the low frequency of this complication. We emphasize the minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach, as it has been applied for two cases with this type of complication. A high rate of suspicion for thoracic duct injury should be maintained in all patients after esophageal surgery, with any pleural effusion entering the differential diagnosis of chylothorax