Esophageal fistula remains one of the main postoperative complications, with the treatment often requiring the use of stents. This article reviews the updates on the use of endoscopic stents for the treatment of postoperative esophageal leakage in terms of indications, types of stents used, efficiency, specific complications and perspectives. Materials and Methods: We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for the keywords postoperative esophageal anastomotic leak and postoperative esophageal anastomotic leak stent, and retrieved relevant papers published until December 2022. Results: The endoscopic discovery of the fistula is usually followed by the insertion of a fully covered esophageal stent. It has an efficiency of more than 60% in closing the fistula, and the failure is related to the delayed application of the method, a situation more suitable for endo vac therapy. The most common complication is migration, but life-threatening complications have also been described. The combination of the advantages of endoscopic stents and vacuum therapy is probably found in the emerging VACstent procedure. Conclusions: Although the competing approaches give promising results, this method has a well-defined place in the treatment of esophageal fistulas, and it is probably necessary to refine the indications for each individual procedure.

Esophageal anastomotic fistula (AF) is a frequent and severe complication of an esophagectomy due to esophageal or eso-gastric junction cancer, regardless of the selected surgical technique. AF is usually treated by endoscopic stent placement. Objectives: This study aims to examine the efficacy of stents in the treatment of AF, analyzing the healing period and the factors that contribute to its delay. Methods: We collected data from 55 patients who underwent stent implantation for AF, and analyzed multiple variables related to patient healing time and surgical technique with two primary endpoints: post-stenting hospital stay and the time of stent usage until fistula closure. The patients were divided into three groups based on the anastomosis type (eso-gastric anastomosis, eso-gastric cervical anastomosis and eso-jejunal anastomosis) and they were compared using the primary endpoints. Results: Our findings show the differences between the three groups, with a longer hospital stay for eso-gastric anastomosis, and an extended time of fistula closure in the case of eso-gastric cervical anastomosis. We also found a significant correlation between the size of the fistula and the hospital stay (R = 0.4, p < 0.01). Regarding patients’ risk factors, our results show an extended post-stenting hospital stay for those patients that underwent preoperative radiotherapy. Conclusions: Our results offer an extended view of the efficiency, hospitalization duration and healing time for esophageal anastomotic fistula, and reveal some of the factors that interfere with its resolution.

Traditionally, the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer has involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection, and, in some cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to present current advances and ongoing controversies in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), with a particular focus on clarifying the role of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in contemporary treatment strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in Medline/PubMed using various keyword combinations, including “rectal cancer/neoplasia” and“therapy” or “neoadjuvant therapy” or “TNT”, and included articles published between 2015 and 2025. Results: The association of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with preoperative systemic chemotherapy has led to the current concept of total neoadjuvant therapy. The advantages of preoperative chemotherapy include better patient compliance, a decrease in the rate of local recurrence and distant metastases via the early destruction of infra-clinical micrometastases, and higher rates of pathological complete response. All of these have led to the inclusion of this strategy in treatment guidelines for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusions: However, the selection of patients with advanced rectal tumors for optimal therapy requires comprehensive imaging assessments, molecular and genetic testing, and a multidisciplinary team to determine the most appropriate total neoadjuvant therapy approach.

Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly indicated in the management of malignant disease. Although oesophagectomy is a difficult operation, with a long learning curve, there is actually a shift towards the laparoscopic/thoracoscopic/ robotic approach, due to the advantages of visualization, surgeon comfort (robotic surgery) and the possibility of the whole team to see the operation as well as and the operating surgeon. Although currently there are still many controversial topics, about the surgical treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinoma, such as the type of open or minimally invasive surgical approach, the type of oesophago-gastric resection, the type of lymph node dissection and others, the minimally invasive approach has proven to be a way to reduce postoperative complications of resection, especially by decreasing pulmonary complications. The implementation of new technologies allowed the widening of the range of indications for this type of surgical approach. The short-term and long-term results, as well as the benefits for the patient - reduced surgical trauma, quick and easy recovery - offer this type of surgical treatment the premises for future development. This article reviews the updates and perspectives on the minimally invasive approach for GOJ adenocarcinoma.

Surgical practice worldwide has changed rapidly in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality, in hospitalized patients, in Romanian surgical services. We have developed our research on a national survey of the consecutive records of hospitalizations, surgical interventions and deaths performed in Romania between March and August 2020. Results show that 47 surgical departments responded to the request. The admissions in the period March–August 2020 represented 52% of that from the similar period of 2019. In the studied period, the share of surgical interventions in patients admitted to non-COVID-19 centres was 98.7%, respectively 78.2% in COVID-19 support hospitals (p < 0.05), and emergency interventions of 43.4% in non-COVID-19 hospitals, respectively 84.8% in COVID-19 support hospitals (p < 0.05). Overall mortality in this period was 5.82%, compared to 3.28% in a similar period in 2019, (p < 0.05). Postoperative mortality in COVID-19-positive patients was 19%. In conclusion, in the hospitals in Romania included in the survey, the overall mortality in the studied period was higher than in a similar period in 2019. In patients with COVID-19 positive, the recorded postoperative mortality was higher than overall mortality.