This systematic review aims to evaluate critically and synthesize the existing literature on the outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair for posterior medial meniscus injuries, with a focus on osteoarthritis (OA) development. We sought to assess the incidence of OA following both treatment modalities, compare functional outcomes post-treatment, and identify factors influencing treatment choice, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical decision-making. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up until December 2023, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes included OA development, functional knee outcomes, and quality of life measures. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 298 patients. The systematic review revealed a significant association between meniscal repair and decreased progression of OA compared to meniscectomy. Meniscectomy patients demonstrated a 51.42% progression rate towards OA, significantly higher than the 21.28% observed in meniscal repair patients. Functional outcomes, as measured by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, were notably better in the repair group, with average scores of 74.68 (IKDC) and 83.78 (Lysholm) compared to 67.55 (IKDC) and 74.56 (Lysholm) in the meniscectomy group. Furthermore, the rate of complete healing in the repair group was reported at 71.4%, as one study reported, indicating a favorable prognosis for meniscal preservation. However, these pooled data should be interpreted with consideration to the heterogeneity of the analyzed studies. Meniscal repair for posterior medial meniscus injuries is superior to meniscectomy in preventing OA development and achieving better functional outcomes and quality of life post-treatment. These findings strongly suggest the adoption of meniscal repair as the preferred treatment modality for such injuries, emphasizing the need for a paradigm shift in clinical practice towards preserving meniscal integrity to optimize patient outcomes.

Background and Clinical Significance: Since their first introduction in the early 1950s, hip prostheses implants are becoming increasingly reliable; nevertheless, failures can still happen. The focus of this paper is to present a case study on a catastrophic fractured hip prosthesis liner that consequently led to revision surgery and the replacement of the destroyed implant. Case Presentation: The patient was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and had Total Hip Arthroplasty on both legs, but only the right side needed revision due to a fracture in the liner. The patient’s symptoms were a squeaking sound, functional impairment, and pain, and an X-ray showed the extent of the damage. We also present a short review on the mechanisms of liner fracture, focusing strictly on the mechanical aspects of failure. Conclusions: Hip prosthesis implants are not immune to failure. This case highlights the importance of an interdisciplinary approach and emphasizes the need for vigilant postoperative monitoring and the development of predictive tools.

Background/Objectives: Chronic ruptures of the quadriceps and Achilles tendons present significant reconstructive challenges due to factors such as tendon retraction, scar tissue formation, and compromised tissue quality. Traditional repair methods, including V–Y tendinoplasty, autografts, and synthetic scaffolds, often prove inadequate for large or neglected defects. Achilles tendon bone–tendon allografts have emerged as a promising alternative, offering strong fixation, biological incorporation, and sufficient length for bridging extensive gaps. This study aims to document the clinical, radiographic, and MRI outcomes of two challenging cases treated with Achilles tendon bone–tendon allografts and to synthesize these findings within the context of the existing literature to evaluate the broader viability of this reconstructive approach. Methods: An observational analysis was conducted at the Orthopedic and Traumatology Clinic of “Victor Popescu” Military Emergency Hospital in Timișoara, encompassing two patients with chronic, iterative tendon ruptures—one quadriceps tendon rupture and one Achilles tendon rupture. Both patients had previously failed primary repairs, resulting in significant tendon retraction and tissue deficits. Reconstruction was performed using Achilles tendon bone–tendon allografts, involving specific osteotomy techniques for patellar and calcaneal fixation. Postoperative protocols included immobilization followed by structured physiotherapy. Clinical assessments and MRI evaluations were conducted at 8, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, a comprehensive literature review was performed to compare our findings with existing studies on Achilles bone–tendon allograft utilization in chronic tendon reconstructions. Results: Both patients exhibited substantial improvements in their range of motion and reported low pain levels at the 8- and 12-week follow-ups. MRI assessments indicated well-aligned graft fibers, early bone block integration, and the absence of complications such as re-rupture or infection in the long term. Functional recovery was achieved with complete bone block union and return to normal activities by 24 weeks. The literature review corroborated these outcomes, demonstrating that Achilles tendon bone–tendon allografts provide robust fixation and facilitate biological integration, particularly in cases with large defects and poor tissue quality. Comparative studies highlighted similar functional improvements and graft stability, reinforcing the efficacy of bone–tendon allograft constructs over traditional repair methods in chronic tendon ruptures. Conclusions: Achilles tendon bone–tendon allografts are effective in reconstructing chronic quadriceps and Achilles tendon ruptures, offering robust fixation and facilitating biological integration. These findings, supported by the existing literature, suggest that Achilles bone–tendon allografts are a viable alternative to traditional repair strategies, especially in patients with extensive tendon defects and compromised tissue quality. Further comparative studies are warranted to establish the superiority of bone–tendon allograft constructs over conventional methods.

Background and objectives: Regenerative medicine, with its massive development over the years, has the potential to solve some of the most problematic medical issues, such as functional organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to create a human meniscal shape 3D-printed enriched with human adipose-derived mesenchymal cells. Materials and Methods: Human infrapatellar fat pad was harvested, and mesenchymal cells were isolated. The mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated to the chondrocite lineage and a hydrogel (a nanofibrillar cellulose, sodium alginate, D-mannitol, and Hepes buffer solution combination) cell mixture was bioprinted to create three human-size meniscus structures. The obtained structures were evaluated regarding the cell viability, appropriate size in relation to a native meniscus, and some mechanical characteristics. Results: The human meniscal shape created respected the anatomic characteristic of a native structure. Cell viability of approximately 97% and extracellular matrix formation after the printing process were observed. The mean maximum force for the meniscus with mesenchymal cells was 6.5 N (+/−0.5 N) compared to the mean maximum force for the native meniscus of 10.32 N (+/−0.7 N), which is statistically relevant (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This paper presents the potential of bioprinting viable cell structures that could in the future present enough mechanical strength to replace a human organ, such as a meniscus. There are still limitations regarding the ink and the printing process, but we are confident that these problems will soon be solvable.

Background/Objectives: Multiligament knee injuries, involving damage to multiple stabilizing structures, present a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, often resulting in knee instability and compromised function. While anatomic ligament reconstruction has been traditionally advocated, non-anatomic techniques may provide effective alternatives, particularly for patients with moderate functional demands who do not require high-level athletic performance. Material and methods: In this study, we assessed the outcomes of a non-anatomic, hybrid surgical approach involving combined arthroscopic and open non-anatomic ligament reconstruction in 60 patients with multiligament knee injuries. Using simplified reconstruction methods for the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL), we tailored the procedures to the needs of active, non-professional patients. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results: Postoperative improvements were significant, with the total IKDC score increasing from a median of 39.1 preoperatively to 75.9 postoperatively, Lysholm from 61.0 to 87.0, and KOOS from 47.6 to 85.7 (p < 0.01). The results demonstrated significant improvements across all scoring systems, with enhanced knee stability, reduced pain, and better quality of life. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of non-anatomic reconstructions as a practical solution for patients seeking a return to daily activities and recreational sports without the complexity of full anatomic reconstruction.

Background: Musculoskeletal injuries are frequent in handball players due to the high-impact nature of the sport. Accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment are essential for recovery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the gold standard for evaluating complex sports-related injuries. This case report aims to assess the role of MRI in diagnosing trauma in professional handball players and the effectiveness of individualized treatment approaches. Methods: Four male members of the “Politehnica” Timișoara first team who sustained match- or training-related injuries between January 2023 and December 2024 underwent an 1.5 T MRI. Individualized conservative protocols included rest, NSAIDs, physiotherapy, and graded kinesitherapy. Results: The first case involved a right back with a knee hematoma and a vastus lateralis tear. Conservative treatment led to recovery. The second case was a left back with peripheral neuropathy caused by hamstring avulsion at the ischial tuberosity. Conservative therapy alleviated symptoms. The third case involved a left winger with adductor muscle tears, which recovered with conservative management. The fourth case, a goalkeeper, had a type III navicular fracture misdiagnosed on radiography, correctly identified via MRI and treated conservatively. Conclusions: MRI is invaluable in diagnosing handball-related injuries, enabling accurate assessments and effective individualized treatment, resulting in early recovery.