This work is aimed at the experimental characterisation of air quality and thermal profile within an electric vehicle cabin, measuring at the same time the HVAC system energy consumption. Pollutant concentrations in the vehicle cabin are measured by means of a low-cost system of sensors. The effects of the HVAC system configuration, such as fresh-air and recirculation mode, on cabin air quality, are discussed. It is shown that the PM concentrations observed in recirculation mode are lower than those in fresh-air mode, while VOC concentrations are generally higher in recirculation than in fresh-air mode. The energy consumption is compared in different configurations of the HVAC system. The novelty of this work is the combined measurement of important comfort parameters such as air temperature distribution and air quality within the vehicle, together with the real time energy consumption of the HVAC system. A wider concept of comfort is enabled, based on the use of low-cost sensors in the automotive field.

The use of low-cost sensors has dramatically increased in recent years in all engineering sectors. In the buildings and automotive field, low-cost sensors open very interesting perspectives, because they allow one to monitor temperature and humidity distributions together with air quality in a widespread and punctual way and allow for the control of all energy parameters. The main issue remains the validation of the measurements. In this work, we propose an innovative approach to verify the measurements given by some low-cost systems built ad hoc for automotive applications. Two independent low-cost measurement systems were set to measure Particulate Air Matter (PM) concentration, TVOC concentration, CO₂ concentration, formaldehyde concentration, air temperature, relative humidity, pressure, air flow velocity, and GPS position. These systems were calibrated for PM concentration measurement by comparison with standard and certified sensors used by the regional authority of the Emilia-Romagna region (ARPAE, Italy) for characterizing air quality. The duration of the analysis, three days, is not representative of the diverse environmental conditions that occur across different seasons. However, the innovation of this approach lies in both the in-field comparison of low-cost and high-quality sensors and the use of proper conversion approaches for mass concentration measurements. A quantitative analysis of the sensors’ performance is given, with a focus on the effects of time granularity, relative humidity, mass conversion from particle counts, and size detection response. The results show that the low-cost sensors’ measurements of air temperature, relative humidity, and particle number concentration are in good agreement with high-quality sensors’ measurements, with a strong impact of relative humidity on performance indicators. Overall, good quality and consistency of the data among the sensors were achieved.

The use of low cost sensors has dramatically increased in recent years in all the engineering sectors. In the field of buildings and automotive, low cost sensors open very interesting perspectives, because they allow to monitor temperature and humidity distributions together with air quality, in a widespread and punctual way and allow control of all energy parameters. The main issue still open remains the validation of the measurements. In this work, we propose an innovative approach to verify the measurements given by some low-cost systems built ad hoc for automotive applications. Two independent low-cost measurement systems have been set to measure Particulate air Matter (PM) concentration, TVOC concentration, CO2 concentration, formaldehyde concentration, air temperature, relative humidity, pressure, air flow velocity and GPS position. These systems have been calibrated by the comparison with standard and certified sensors used by the regional authority of Emilia-Romagna region (ARPAE, Italy) for characterising the air-quality. The innovation of this approach lies in both the in-field comparison of low-cost and high quality sensors and the use of proper conversion approaches for mass concentration measurements. A quantitative analysis of the sensors performance is given, with a focus on effects of time-granularity, relative humidity, mass conversion from particle counts and size detection response. The results show that the low-cost sensors measurements of air temperature, relative humidity and particle number concentration are in a good agreement with high quality sensors measurements, with a strong impact of relative humidity on performance indicators. Overall, a good quality and consistency of the data among the sensors has been achieved.