Aims: The effect of fibrate treatment on cardiovascular risk is inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of fibrates on major adverse cardiovascular outcome (MACE) reduction. Methods and results: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to February 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing fibrate therapy against placebo and reporting cardiovascular outcomes and lipid profile changes. The primary outcome was the clinical outcomes of each trial that most closely corresponding to MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization. A pre-specified meta-regression analysis to examine the relationship between the changes in lipid levels after fibrate treatment and the risk of MACE was also performed. Twelve trials were selected for final analysis, with 25 781 patients and 2741 MACEs in the fibrate group and 27 450 patients and 3754 MACEs in the control group. Overall, fibrate therapy was associated with decreased risk of MACE [RR 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.94] with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 47%). In meta-regression analysis, each 1 mmol/L reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after fibrate treatment reduced MACE (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.49–0.94, P = 0.01), while triglyceride level changes did not show a significant association (RR per 1mmol/L reduction 0.96, 95% CI 0.53–1.40, P = 0.86). A sensitivity analysis with the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or acute myocardial infarction produced similar results. Conclusion: Treatment with fibrates was associated with decreased risk of MACE. The reduction in MACE risk with fibrate therapy appears to be attributable to LDL-C reduction rather than a decrease in triglyceride levels.

Korean Circulation Journal 대한심장학회지 순환기 Kim HK, et al. Korean Circ J. 2019 Aug;50:e132. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0196

Korean Circulation Journal 대한심장학회지 순환기 Chang K, et al. Korean Circ J. 2021 Apr;51(4):289-307. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0043

Background: Intensive glycemic control is generally recommended for diabetic patients to reduce complications. However, the role of glycemic control in the mortality in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remained unclear. Methods: We selected diabetic patients who measured HbA1c more than 3 times after AMI among 10,719 patients enrolled in the multicenter AMI registry. Patients (n = 1384) were categorized into five groups: according to mean HbA1c level: ≤ 6.5%, > 6.5 to ≤ 7.0%, > 7.0 to ≤ 7.5%, > 7.5 to ≤ 8.0% and > 8.0%. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results: During a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the patients with a mean HbA1c of 6.5 to 7.0% had the lowest all-cause mortality. Compared to patients with mean HbA1c of 6.5 to 7.0%, the risk of all-cause mortality increased in subjects with mean HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–3.95) and in those with mean HbA1c > 8.0% (adjusted HR 3.35, 95% CI 1.78–6.29). In the subgroup analysis by age, the J-curve relationship between mean HbA1c and all-cause mortality was accentuated in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years), while there was no difference in all-cause mortality across the HbA1c groups in younger patients (age < 65 years). Conclusions: The less strict glycemic control in diabetic patients with AMI would be optimal for preventing mortality, especially in elderly patients.

Background: Little is known about the characteristics and long‐term clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) after acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results: From a multicenter, consecutive cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, patients with an initial echocardiogram with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and at least 1 follow‐up echocardiogram after 14 days and within 2 years of the initial event were considered for analyses. HFimpEF was defined as an initial left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and serial left ventricular ejection fraction >40% with an increase of ≥10% from baseline at follow‐up. Independent factors predicting HFimpEF were identified, and clinical outcomes of patients with HFimpEF were compared with those without improvement. From an initial cohort of 10 719 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 191 patients with HFimpEF and 256 patients with non‐HFimpEF who had initial and follow‐up echocardiographic data were analyzed. The median follow‐up duration was 4.5 (interquartile range, 2.9–5.0) years. The factors predicting HFimpEF were lower peak creatine kinase myocardial band, smaller left ventricular dimensions, lower ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity ′, and the use of β blockers or renin–angiotensin system blockers at discharge. HFimpEF was associated with a significantly decreased risk of all‐cause death compared with non‐HFimpEF (hazard ratio, 0.377 [95% CI, 0.234–0.609]; P <0.001). In 2‐year landmark analysis, these findings were consistent not only before but also after the landmark point. Similar findings were true for cardiovascular death and admission for heart failure. Conclusions: Patients with HFimpEF after acute myocardial infarction showed distinct clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and were associated with better long‐term clinical outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT02806102.