Nils Collath

Mr. Nils Collath

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 September 2022 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNils Collath
Nils Collath
BTBenedikt Tepe
Benedikt Tepe
SEStefan Englberger
Stefan Englberger
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse

18 July 2023 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNils Collath
Nils Collath
MCMartin Cornejo
Martin Cornejo
VEVeronika Engwerth
Veronika Engwerth
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

15 November 2021 in Electricity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDaniel Kucevic
Daniel Kucevic
LSLeo Semmelmann
Leo Semmelmann
NCNils Collath
Nils Collath
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
The growing global electricity demand and the upcoming integration of charging options for electric vehicles is creating challenges for power grids, such as line over loading. With continuously falling costs for lithium-ion batteries, storage systems represent an alternative to conventional grid reinforcement. This paper proposes an operation strategy for battery energy storage systems, targeted at industrial consumers to achieve both an improvement in the distribution grid and electricity bill savings for the industrial consumer. The objective is to reduce the peak power at the point of common coupling in existing distribution grids by adapting the control of the battery energy storage system at individual industrial consumer sites. An open-source simulation tool, which enables a realistic simulation of the effects of storage systems in different operating modes on the distribution grid, has been adapted as part of this work. Further information on the additional stress on the storage system is derived from a detailed analysis based on six key characteristics. The results show that, with the combined approach, both the local peak load and the global peak load can be reduced, while the stress on the energy storage is not significantly increased. The peak load at the point of common coupling is reduced by 5.6 kVA to 56.7 kVA and the additional stress for the storage system is, on average, for a six month simulation, period only 1.2 full equivalent cycles higher.

3 April 2024 in Journal of Energy Storage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNils Collath
Nils Collath
HWHenry Winner
Henry Winner
AFAlexander Frank
Alexander Frank
ADAxel Durdel
Axel Durdel
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen

28 August 2023 in ECS Meeting Abstracts
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPaul Gasper
Paul Gasper
NCNils Collath
Nils Collath
Holger HesseHolger Hesse
Holger Hesse
Andreas JossenAndreas Jossen
Andreas Jossen
KSKandler Smith
Kandler Smith
Predictive battery life models are commonly utilized to extrapolate degradation trends observed during accelerated aging tests for simulation of degradation in real-world applications. Thus, fitting accelerated aging data as accurately as possible and with low uncertainty is crucial for making believable projections of battery lifetime, but it is challenging to identify algebraic expressions that accurately fit multivariate degradation trends. A review of models published in literature reveal some common expressions for fitting calendar aging data, which is only dependent on temperature and state-of-charge, but no consistency across many models for fitting cycle aging data, indicating the need for a statistically rigorous data driven approach for developing empirical models. This talk will describe a machine-learning assisted method for identification of predictive battery life models utilizing bilevel optimization and symbolic regression. Bilevel optimization with cross-validation is used to statistically determine cell- and stress-dependent model parameters, while symbolic regression identifies both linear and multiplicative candidate expressions to predict stress-dependent degradation rates by selecting low-order subsets of features from a generated feature library. Because model expressions are identified empirically, it is crucial to ensure resulting models behave according to physical expectations, so the stability of models for interpolation or extrapolation is interrogated qualitatively through simulation and quantitatively through cross-validation and uncertainty quantification via bootstrap resampling. This model identification approach substantially improves upon models identified purely using expert judgement in terms of both accuracy and uncertainty. Model simulation and validation is then conducted by deriving a state-equation form of the predictive model, enabling simulation of battery aging under dynamic stresses. This enables validation of the predictive battery model on lab-based tests with varying conditions or on drive-cycle or application-cycle testing protocols. Parameter uncertainty can be carried forward into model simulation, giving lifetime estimates and confidence windows for cell- or system-level lifetime. The financial impact of battery model uncertainty can be estimated by incorporating uncertainty into a technoeconomic model.