Chiu-Feng Lin

Dr. Chiu-Feng Lin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 March 2018 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMichaela Fousova
Michaela Fousova
DVDalibor Vojtěch
Dalibor Vojtěch
KDKarel Doubrava
Karel Doubrava
MDMatej Daniel
Matej Daniel
CLChiu-Feng Lin
Chiu-Feng Lin
Additive manufacture (AM) appears to be the most suitable technology to produce sophisticated, high quality, lightweight parts from Ti6Al4V alloy. However, the fatigue life of AM parts is of concern. In our study, we focused on a comparison of two techniques of additive manufacture—selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM)—in terms of the mechanical properties during both static and dynamic loading. All of the samples were untreated to focus on the influence of surface condition inherent to SLM and EBM. The EBM samples were studied in the as-built state, while SLM was followed by heat treatment. The resulting similarity of microstructures led to comparable mechanical properties in tension, but, due to differences in surface roughness and specific internal defects, the fatigue strength of the EBM samples reached only half the value of the SLM samples. Higher surface roughness that is inherent to EBM contributed to multiple initiations of fatigue cracks, while only one crack initiated on the SLM surface. Also, facets that were formed by an intergranular cleavage fracture were observed in the EBM samples.

1 December 2020 in Ultrasonics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yixuan FengYixuan Feng
Yixuan Feng
FHFu-Chuan Hsu
Fu-Chuan Hsu
YLYu-Ting Lu
Yu-Ting Lu
YLYU-FU LIN
YU-FU LIN
CLChorng-Tyan Lin
Chorng-Tyan Lin
Steven Yuehsan LiangSteven Yuehsan Liang
Steven Yuehsan Liang

16 July 2019 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yixuan FengYixuan Feng
Yixuan Feng
FHFu-Chuan Hsu
Fu-Chuan Hsu
YLYu-Ting Lu
Yu-Ting Lu
YLYU-FU LIN
YU-FU LIN
CLChorng-Tyan Lin
Chorng-Tyan Lin
Steven Yuehsan LiangSteven Yuehsan Liang
Steven Yuehsan Liang

21 December 2019 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yixuan FengYixuan Feng
Yixuan Feng
THTsung-Pin Hung
Tsung-Pin Hung
YLYu-Ting Lu
Yu-Ting Lu
YLYU-FU LIN
YU-FU LIN
FHFu-Chuan Hsu
Fu-Chuan Hsu
Steven Yuehsan LiangSteven Yuehsan Liang
Steven Yuehsan Liang

16 March 2021 in Machines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PZPan Zou
Pan Zou
MRManik Rajora
Manik Rajora
CLChiu-Feng Lin
Chiu-Feng Lin
YLYing-Cheng Lu
Ying-Cheng Lu
MMMingYou Ma
MingYou Ma
Steven Yuehsan LiangSteven Yuehsan Liang
Steven Yuehsan Liang
A tremendous amount of work has been done in the recent years in the optimization of input parameters, however, current optimization techniques can only provide a single optimal input process parameter combination. Although alternative techniques have been developed to provide multiple solutions with identical objective values, these techniques have low efficiency when searching for multiple solutions. In this paper, a two-stage filter split-optimization approach is proposed to obtain multiple solutions, at a higher efficiency than for a single-objective optimization problem. The aforementioned tasks are accomplished by first performing an initial split-optimization and then performing a second optimization after excluding input parameters from having their range split into sub-ranges based on the results of the initial optimization. The proposed approach enables the algorithm to explore input parameters that have a more significant impact on the objective function, thereby enabling it to find multiple optimal solutions more efficiently. The proposed approach was validated by using it to optimize the input process parameters of an electrochemical machining problem with five input parameters. The results from the case study show that though the proposed approach provided fewer optimal solutions it was able to obtain them at twice the efficiency when compared to the original method.