Lijian Shi

Dr. Lijian Shi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2016 in Acta Oceanologica Sinica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TZTao Zeng
Tao Zeng
LSLijian Shi
Lijian Shi
Marko MäkynenMarko Mäkynen
Marko Mäkynen
BCBin Cheng
Bin Cheng
JZJuhong Zou
Juhong Zou
ZZZhiping Zhang
Zhiping Zhang

3 March 2017 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juha KarvonenJuha Karvonen
Juha Karvonen
LSLijian Shi
Lijian Shi
BCBin Cheng
Bin Cheng
MSMarkku Simila
Markku Simila
Marko MäkynenMarko Mäkynen
Marko Mäkynen
TVTimo Vihma
Timo Vihma
We estimate two essential sea ice parameters—namely, sea ice concentration (SIC) and sea ice thickness (SIT)—for the Bohai Sea using a combination of a thermodynamic sea ice model and Earth observation (EO) data from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and microwave radiometer. We compare the SIC and SIT estimation results with in-situ measurements conducted in the study area and estimates based on independent EO data from near-infrared/optical instruments. These comparisons suggest that the SAR-based discrimination between sea ice and open-water works well, and areas of thinner and thicker ice can be distinguished. A larger comprehensive training dataset is needed to set up an operational algorithm for the estimation of SIC and SIT.

22 August 2016 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLi Mingming
Li Mingming
CZChaofang Zhao
Chaofang Zhao
YZYong Zhao
Yong Zhao
ZWZhixiong Wang
Zhixiong Wang
LSLijian Shi
Lijian Shi
A sea ice detection algorithm based on Fisher’s linear discriminant analysis is developed to segment sea ice and open water for the Ku-band scatterometer onboard the China’s Hai Yang 2A Satellite (HY-2A/SCAT). Residual classification errors are reduced through image erosion/dilation techniques and sea ice growth/retreat constraint methods. The arctic sea-ice-type classification is estimated via a time-dependent threshold derived from the annual backscatter trends based on previous HY-2A/SCAT derived sea ice extent. The extent and edge of the sea ice obtained in this study is compared with the Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) sea ice concentration data and the Sentinel-1 SAR imagery for verification, respectively. Meanwhile, the classified sea ice type is compared with a multi-sensor sea ice type product based on data from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) and SSMIS. Results show that HY-2A/SCAT is powerful in providing sea ice extent and type information, while differences in the sensitivities of active/passive products are found. In addition, HY-2A/SCAT derived sea ice products are also proved to be valuable complements for existing polar sea ice data products.

25 December 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMeijie Liu
Meijie Liu
RYRan Yan
Ran Yan
JZJie Zhang
Jie Zhang
YXYing Xu
Ying Xu
PCPing Chen
Ping Chen
Xi ZhangXi Zhang
Xi Zhang
Sea ice type is the key parameter of Arctic sea ice monitoring. Microwave remote sensors with medium incidence and normal incidence modes are the primary detection methods for sea ice types. The Surface Wave Investigation and Monitoring instrument (SWIM) on the China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) is a new type of sensor with a small incidence angle detection mode that is different from traditional remote sensors. The method of sea ice detection using SWIM data is also under development. The research reported here concerns ice classification using SWIM data in the Arctic from October 2019 to April 2020. Six waveform features are extracted from the SWIM echo data at small incidence angles, then the distinguishing capabilities of a single feature are analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance. The classifiers of the k-nearest neighbor and support vector machine are established and chosen based on single features. Moreover, sea ice classification based on multi-feature combinations is carried out using the chosen KNN classifier, and optimal combinations are developed. Compared with sea ice charts, the overall accuracy is up to 81% using the optimal classifier and a multi-feature combination at 2°. The results reveal that SWIM data can be used to classify sea water and sea ice types. Moreover, the optimal multi-feature combinations with the KNN method are applied to sea ice classification in the local regions. The classification results are analyzed using Sentinel-1 SAR images. In general, it is concluded that these multifeature combinations with the KNN method are effective in sea ice classification using SWIM data. Our work confirms the potential of sea ice classification based on the new SWIM sensor, and highlight the new sea ice monitoring technology and application of remote sensing at small incidence angles.

27 September 2021 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Xi ZhangXi Zhang
Xi Zhang
YZYixun Zhu
Yixun Zhu
JZJie Zhang
Jie Zhang
QWQimao Wang
Qimao Wang
LSLijian Shi
Lijian Shi
MBMeng Bao
Meng Bao
Accurate identification of sea ice type from altimeter data is important for inversion of sea ice freeboard by radar altimeter, as well as for maritime navigation in polar regions. Previous sea ice classification studies have rarely involved multifrequency altimeter data. In this article, benefiting from the dual-frequency observation capability of the Chinese HY-2B altimeter, differences between waveform features of C- and Ku-band radar altimeter over different types of sea ice were investigated and analyzed for the first time. To validate and evaluate the sea ice classification capability of different feature combinations of the different bands, we extracted 14 features from the waveforms of C- and Ku-band HY-2B altimeter data acquired between December 2019 and April 2020. Our experiments demonstrated that the C- and Ku-band radar waveforms are sensitive to sea ice type, and that sea ice type classification could be improved by combining Ku- and C- band data. This work also proposed a sea ice classification methodology using C- and Ku-band altimeter waveforms. Comparison with results from previous studies indicated that the overall accuracy of the proposed method (up to 93.45%) is much higher than that of existing state-of-the-art methods.

21 February 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZDZhaoqing Dong
Zhaoqing Dong
LSLijian Shi
Lijian Shi
MLMingsen Lin
Mingsen Lin
TZTao Zeng
Tao Zeng
Arctic sea ice and snow affect the energy balance of the global climate system through the radiation budget. Accurate determination of the snow cover over Arctic sea ice is significant for the retrieval of the sea ice thickness (SIT). In this study, we developed a new snow depth retrieval method over Arctic sea ice with a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning algorithm based on Operation IceBridge (OIB) snow depth data and brightness temperature data of AMSR-2 passive microwave radiometers. We compared climatology products (modified W99 and AWI), altimeter products (Kwok) and microwave radiometer products (Bremen, Neural Network and LSTM). The climatology products and altimeter products are completely independent of the OIB data used for training, while microwave radiometer products are not completely independent of the OIB data. We also compared the SITs retrieved from the above different snow depth products based on Cryosat-2 radar altimeter data. First, the snow depth spatial patterns for all products are in broad agreement, but the temporal evolution patterns are distinct. Snow products of microwave radiometers, such as Bremen, Neural Network and LSTM snow depth products, show thicker snow in early winter with respect to the climatology snow depth products and the altimeter snow depth product, especially in the multiyear ice (MYI) region. In addition, the differences in all snow depth products are relatively large in the early winter and relatively small in spring. Compared with the OIB and IceBird observation data (April 2019), the snow depth retrieved by the LSTM algorithm is better than that retrieved by the other algorithms in terms of accuracy, with a correlation of 0.55 (0.90), a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.06 m (0.05 m) and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.05 m (0.04 m). The spatial pattern and seasonal variation of the SITs retrieved from different snow depths are basically consistent. The total sea ice decreases first and then thickens as the seasons change. Compared with the OIB SIT in April 2019, the SIT retrieved by the LSTM snow depth is superior to that retrieved by the other SIT products in terms of accuracy, with the highest correlation of 0.46, the lowest RMSE of 0.59 m and the lowest MAE of 0.44 m. In general, it is promising to retrieve Arctic snow depth using the LSTM algorithm, but the retrieval of snow depth over MYI still needs to be verified with more measured data, especially in early winter.