Anthony E. Samir

Dr. Anthony E. Samir

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 February 2018 in Abdominal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AOArinc Ozturk
Arinc Ozturk
JGJoseph R. Grajo
Joseph R. Grajo
MDManish Dhyani
Manish Dhyani
BABrian W. Anthony
Brian W. Anthony
ASAnthony E. Samir
Anthony E. Samir

1 March 2015 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAnthony E. Samir
Anthony E. Samir
MDManish Dhyani
Manish Dhyani
AVAbhinav Vij
Abhinav Vij
ABAtul K. Bhan
Atul K. Bhan
EHElkan F. Halpern
Elkan F. Halpern
RCRaymond T. Chung
Raymond T. Chung
To evaluate the accuracy of shear-wave elastography (SWE) for staging liver fibrosis in patients with diffuse liver disease (including patients with hepatitis C virus [HCV]) and to determine the relative accuracy of SWE measurements obtained from different hepatic acquisition sites for staging liver fibrosis. The institutional review board approved this single-institution prospective study, which was performed between January 2010 and March 2013 in 136 consecutive patients who underwent SWE before their scheduled liver biopsy (age range, 18-76 years; mean age, 49 years; 70 men, 66 women). Informed consent was obtained from all patients. SWE measurements were obtained at four sites in the liver. Biopsy specimens were reviewed in a blinded manner by a pathologist using METAVIR criteria. SWE measurements and biopsy results were compared by using the Spearman correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. SWE values obtained at the upper right lobe showed the highest correlation with estimation of fibrosis (r = 0.41, P < .001). Inflammation and steatosis did not show any correlation with SWE values except for values from the left lobe, which showed correlation with steatosis (r = 0.24, P = .004). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the differentiation of stage F2 fibrosis or greater, stage F3 fibrosis or greater, and stage F4 fibrosis was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68, 0.86), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.95), respectively, for all subjects who underwent liver biopsy. The corresponding AUCs for the subset of patients with HCV were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.92), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.95), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.00). The adjusted AUCs for differentiating stage F2 or greater fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease and those with HCV were 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. SWE estimates of liver stiffness obtained from the right upper lobe showed the best correlation with liver fibrosis severity and can potentially be used as a noninvasive test to differentiate intermediate degrees of liver fibrosis in patients with liver disease.

17 June 2017 in Abdominal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJeanne M. Horowitz
Jeanne M. Horowitz
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
RERichard L. L Ehman
Richard L. L Ehman
KJKartik Jhaveri
Kartik Jhaveri
PKPatrick Kamath
Patrick Kamath
FMFrank H Miller
Frank H Miller

7 September 2023 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASArun Sanyal
Arun Sanyal
SSSudha S. Shankar
Sudha S. Shankar
KYKatherine P. Yates
Katherine P. Yates
JBJames Bolognese
James Bolognese
EDErika Daly
Erika Daly
RCRoberto A. Calle
Roberto A. Calle
There are no approved diagnostic biomarkers for at-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), defined by the presence of NASH, high histological activity and fibrosis stage ≥2, which is associated with higher incidence of liver-related events and mortality. FNIH-NIMBLE is a multi-stakeholder project to support regulatory approval of NASH-related biomarkers. The diagnostic performance of five blood-based panels was evaluated in an observational (NASH CRN DB2) cohort (n = 1,073) with full spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The panels were intended to diagnose at-risk NASH (NIS4), presence of NASH (OWLiver) or fibrosis stages >2, >3 or 4 (enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test, PROC3 and FibroMeter VCTE). The prespecified performance metric was an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) ≥0.7 and superiority over alanine aminotransferase for disease activity and the FIB-4 test for fibrosis severity. Multiple biomarkers met these metrics. NIS4 had an AUROC of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.78–0.84) for at-risk NASH. The AUROCs of the ELF test, PROC3 and FibroMeterVCTE for clinically significant fibrosis (≥stage 2), advanced fibrosis (≥stage 3) or cirrhosis (stage 4), respectively, were all ≥0.8. ELF and FibroMeter VCTE outperformed FIB-4 for all fibrosis endpoints. These data represent a milestone toward qualification of several biomarker panels for at-risk NASH and also fibrosis severity in individuals with NAFLD.

16 November 2023 in Nature Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LZLin Zhang
Lin Zhang
CMColin Marcus
Colin Marcus
Dabin LinDabin Lin
Dabin Lin
DMDavid Mejorado
David Mejorado
SSScott Joseph Schoen
Scott Joseph Schoen
CDCanan Dagdeviren
Canan Dagdeviren

31 July 2015 in BMC Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnthony E. Samir
Anthony E. Samir
AAAndrew S. Allegretti
Andrew S. Allegretti
QZQingli Zhu
Qingli Zhu
MDManish Dhyani
Manish Dhyani
AAArash Anvari
Arash Anvari
HLHerbert Y. Lin
Herbert Y. Lin
There currently is a need for a non-invasive measure of renal fibrosis. We aim to explore whether shear wave elastography (SWE)-derived estimates of tissue stiffness may serve as a non-invasive biomarker that can distinguish normal and abnormal renal parenchymal tissue. Participants with CKD (by estimated GFR) and healthy volunteers underwent SWE. Renal elasticity was estimated as Young’s modulus (YM) in kilopascals (kPa). Univariate Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. Twenty-five participants with CKD (median GFR 38 mL/min; quartile 1, quartile 3 28, 42) and 20 healthy controls without CKD underwent SWE performed by a single radiologist. CKD was associated with increased median YM (9.40 [5.55, 22.35] vs. 4.40 [3.68, 5.70] kPa; p = 0.002) and higher median intra-subject inter-measurement estimated YM’s variability (4.27 [2.89, 9.90] vs. 1.51 [1.21, 2.05] kPa; p < 0.001). SWE-derived estimates of renal stiffness and intra-subject estimated stiffness variability are higher in patients with CKD than in healthy controls. Renal fibrosis is a plausible explanation for the observed difference in YM. Further studies are required to determine the relationship between YM, estimated renal stiffness, and renal fibrosis severity.