Anil Koirala

Dr. Anil Koirala

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2023 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJeff Atkins
Jeff Atkins
PBParth Bhatt
Parth Bhatt
LCLuis Carrasco
Luis Carrasco
EFEmily Francis
Emily Francis
JGJames Garabedian
James Garabedian
KKKeith Krause
Keith Krause
The measurement of forest structure has evolved steadily due to advances in technology, methodology, and theory. Such advances have greatly increased our capacity to describe key forest structural elements and resulted in a range of measurement approaches from traditional analog tools such as measurement tapes to highly derived and computationally intensive methods such as advanced remote sensing tools (e.g., lidar, radar). This assortment of measurement approaches results in structural metrics unique to each method, with the caveat that metrics may be biased or constrained by the measurement approach taken. While forest structural diversity (FSD) metrics foster novel research opportunities, understanding how they are measured or derived, limitations of the measurement approach taken, as well as their biological interpretation is crucial for proper application. We review the measurement of forest structure and structural diversity—an umbrella term that includes quantification of the distribution of functional and biotic components of forests. We consider how and where these approaches can be used, the role of technology in measuring structure, how measurement impacts extend beyond research, and current limitations and potential opportunities for future research.

7 May 2020 in Wetlands
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STShivaraj Thapa
Shivaraj Thapa
LWLanhui Wang
Lanhui Wang
AKAnil Koirala
Anil Koirala
SSSubina Shrestha
Subina Shrestha
SBSuman Bhattarai
Suman Bhattarai
WAWai Nyein Aye
Wai Nyein Aye

11 January 2023 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BHBenjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
CBCarl Boettiger
Carl Boettiger
Michael DietzeMichael Dietze
Michael Dietze
JGJessica A. Gephart
Jessica A. Gephart
PGPatrick Gonzalez
Patrick Gonzalez
CYCasey Youngflesh
Casey Youngflesh
Synthesis research in ecology and environmental science improves understanding, advances theory, identifies research priorities, and supports management strategies by linking data, ideas, and tools. Accelerating environmental challenges increases the need to focus synthesis science on the most pressing questions. To leverage input from the broader research community, we convened a virtual workshop with participants from many countries and disciplines to examine how and where synthesis can address key questions and themes in ecology and environmental science in the coming decade. Seven priority research topics emerged: (1) diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ), (2) human and natural systems, (3) actionable and use‐inspired science, (4) scale, (5) generality, (6) complexity and resilience, and (7) predictability. Additionally, two issues regarding the general practice of synthesis emerged: the need for increased participant diversity and inclusive research practices; and increased and improved data flow, access, and skill‐building. These topics and practices provide a strategic vision for future synthesis in ecology and environmental science.

25 August 2021 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STShivaraj Thapa
Shivaraj Thapa
SSSubina Shrestha
Subina Shrestha
Ram Kumar AdhikariRam Kumar Adhikari
Ram Kumar Adhikari
SBSuman Bhattarai
Suman Bhattarai
DPDeepa Paudel
Deepa Paudel
AKAnil Koirala
Anil Koirala

12 November 2017 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAnil Koirala
Anil Koirala
Anil Raj KizhaAnil Raj Kizha
Anil Raj Kizha
SUSandra M. De Urioste-Stone
Sandra M. De Urioste-Stone
With recently announced federal funding and subsidies to redevelop vacant mills and the communities they were in, the forest products industry in Maine is poised to gain its momentum once again. One of the important components influencing the cost of delivered forest products is transportation. A recent study in the region has shown that the location and availability of markets along with lack of skilled labor force are the major challenges faced by the forest products transportation sector in Maine. This study was focused on developing a management guideline which included various field level options for improving trucking enterprises in Maine. For this, a qualitative research approach utilizing a case study research tradition was employed, with in-depth semi-structured interviews with professionals directly related to the forest products transportation sector used for data generation. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, with each being audio recorded and later transcribed verbatim. Interview transcriptions were analyzed using NVivo 11. Suggestions, like increasing benefits to drivers and providing training, were proposed for challenges related to manpower shortage, while the marketing of new forest products and adjustment in some state-level policies were proposed for challenges related to the forest products market condition of the state.

1 January 2018 in Applied Engineering in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAnil Raj Kizha
Anil Raj Kizha
HHHan-Sup Han
Han-Sup Han
JPJeffrey Paulson
Jeffrey Paulson
AKAnil Koirala
Anil Koirala
The moisture content (MC) of biomass derived from forest residues can pose a challenge to biomass utilization. It plays a significant role in determining the cost of transportation and subsequent market price. Additionally, emerging biomass conversion technologies, such as gasification, torrefaction, and briquetting, have very narrow specifications for the MC (e.g., <15%) in their feedstocks. The goal of this study was to develop strategies for reducing moisture content by evaluating different arrangement patterns of forest residues and its effect on MC reduction at the harvest site. The study compared four different arrangement patterns including criss-cross, teepees, traditional piling (processor piled), and scattered residues in three different timber harvest units in northern California. Two of the arrangement patterns (criss-cross and processor piled) were also covered with a plastic cover. Samples were collected from each treatment using a transect method and were recorded for 12 months. There was an overall drop of MC from 52% (freshly cut) to 12% between all arrangements over the study period. The cost of construction per pile, averaged $37, $41, and $48 for teepees, criss-cross, and processor piles, respectively. Even though, there was no significant difference in MC reduction between piles (except scattered), each pile arrangement of forest residues directly affected biomass feedstock operations, logistics, and costs. Keywords: Feedstock quality, Logging slash, Transect sampling method, Woody biomass energy.