Wei Zhang

Dr. Wei Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFei Ma
Fei Ma
TZTianji Zhu
Tianji Zhu
YZYalin Zhang
Yalin Zhang
XLXinli Lu
Xinli Lu
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
MFMa feng
Ma feng
Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) has received more and more attention in the thermal energy storage field due to the large heat storage density and nearly constant temperature during phase change process. However, the low thermal conductivity of phase change material (PCM) leads to poor performance of the LHTES system. In this paper, the research about heat transfer enhancement of PCM using fin tubes is summarized. Different kinds of fins, such as rectangular fin, annular fin, spiral fin, etc., are discussed and compared based on the shape of the fins. It is found that the longitudinal rectangular fins have excellent heat transfer performance and are easy to manufacture. The effect of fins on heat transfer enhancement is closely related to the number of fins and its geometric parameters.

14 June 2013 in Transactions of Tianjin University
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THTao Hu
Tao Hu
JZJialing Zhu
Jialing Zhu
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang

26 November 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YRYapeng Ren
Yapeng Ren
XLXinli Lu
Xinli Lu
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
JZJiaqi Zhang
Jiaqi Zhang
JLJiali Liu Liu
Jiali Liu Liu
YZYalin Zhang
Yalin Zhang
Geothermal heating is considered to be one of the low-carbon-energy technologies for building heating. Aiming at the problem that the operating cost and investment cost of geothermal heating systems are still high, the conventional geothermal heating system coupled with energy storage for office building heating is studied in this paper. Four operational strategy models of the coupled system are established based on time-of-use electricity prices. A genetic algorithm is used to find the optimal value of each decision variable using minimization of levelized cost of heat (LCOH) as the objective function. The influences of electricity and equipment prices on the optimal values of the decision variables are discussed. Four operation strategies are investigated. If only operating cost is considered in the optimization, comparison shows that the best operation strategy is the one giving high priority to use the energy storage tank for heating during the peak electricity period. However, if the investment cost is further considered in the optimization, the best operation strategy is the one using the energy storage tank for heat load peak-regulating. In addition, based on the minimization of LCOH, an optimal energy storage ratio is found for each scenario, and suitable conditions of using energy storage tank are discussed. The geothermal heating system coupled with energy storage can have a good performance when the peak-valley electricity price difference is higher than CNY 0.566/kW·h (USD 0.0847/kW·h)+ or the energy storage tank price is lower than CNY 900/m3 (USD 134.64/m3). The results obtained from this study prove that the cost of geothermal heating systems can be effectively reduced by choosing an optimal operation strategy and using an energy storage device with an optimal energy storage ratio.

29 April 2022 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiaqi Zhang
Jiaqi Zhang
XLXinli Lu
Xinli Lu
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
JLJiali Liu Liu
Jiali Liu Liu
WYWen Yue
Wen Yue
MFMa feng
Ma feng
Medium-depth and deep geothermal energy has been widely used because of its abundant resources and supply stability. Recently, attention has been given to the closed-loop heat extraction system using a deep borehole heat exchanger (DBHE), which enables geothermal energy to be harnessed almost everywhere. In this study, a check valve is adopted in a DBHE system in which the whole section of the well is used for heat extraction in winter during building heating and the upper part of the well is used for heat injection in summer during building cooling. The influence of injected water flowrates, water inlet temperatures, depths of the check valve and formation of thermal conductivities on the performance of this novel DBHE system has been investigated. It is found that heat injection through the upper part of the well in summer can improve the heat extraction rates to a certain extent during the heating season. In summer, the inlet temperature of water has a great influence on the heat injection rates. The increase in the depth of the check valve improves the heat injection rates of the novel DBHE system. When the depth of the check valve is 900 m, the heat injection rates in summer can reach 51.03 kW, which is 27.55% of the heat extraction rates in winter. In this case, the heat injection in summer has the greatest effect on the improvement of heat extraction in winter, which is 6.05 kW, accounting for 3.38% of the heat extraction in that year. It is found that the thermal conductivity of the formation has a great influence on the heat extraction rates in winter and heat injection rates in summer. The proposed novel DBHE system can be used to inject the heat discharged from the building in summer and extract geothermal energy for building heating in winter, forming a better heat balance at certain depths and resulting in a sustainable operation for heating and cooling. Another benefit of using this system is that the heat discharged from air conditioning into the air can be reduced in summer and “urban thermal pollution” can be alleviated.

28 July 2016 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKaiyong Hu
Kaiyong Hu
JZJialing Zhu
Jialing Zhu
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
XLXinli Lu
Xinli Lu
As a promising and advanced technology, enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) can be used to generate electricity using deep geothermal energy. In order to better utilize the EGS to produce electricity, power cycles’ selection maps are generated for people to choose the best system based on the geofluids’ temperature and dryness conditions. Optimizations on double-flash system (DF), flash-organic Rankine cycle system (FORC), and double-flash-organic Rankine cycle system (DFORC) are carried out, and the single-flash (SF) system is set as a reference system. The results indicate that each upgraded system (DF, FORC, and DFORC) can produce more net power output compared with the SF system and can reach a maximum net power output under a given geofluid condition. For an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) using R245fa as working fluid, the generated selection maps indicate that using the FORC system can produce more power than using other power cycles when the heat source temperature is below 170 °C. Either DF or DFORC systems could be an option if the heat source temperature is above 170 °C, but the DF system is more attractive under a relatively lower geofluid’s dryness and a higher temperature condition.

8 August 2012 in Transactions of Tianjin University
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLTailu Li
Tailu Li
JZJialing Zhu
Jialing Zhu
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang