Radiomic analyses of CT images provide prognostic information that can potentially be used for personalized treatment. However, heterogeneity of acquisition- and reconstruction protocols influences robustness of radiomic analyses. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different CT-scanners, slice thicknesses, exposures and gray-level discretization on radiomic feature values and their stability. A texture phantom with ten different inserts was scanned on nine different CT-scanners with varying tube currents. Scans were reconstructed with 1.5 mm or 3 mm slice thickness. Image pre-processing comprised gray-level discretization in ten different bin widths ranging from 5 to 50 HU and different resampling methods (i.e., linear, cubic and nearest neighbor interpolation to 1 × 1 × 3 mm3 voxels) were investigated. Subsequently, 114 textural radiomic features were extracted from a 2.1 cm3 sphere in the center of each insert. The influence of slice thickness, exposure and bin width on feature values was investigated. Feature stability was assessed by calculating the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) in a test-retest setting and for different combinations of scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses. Bin width influenced feature values, but this only had a marginal effect on the total number of stable features (CCC > 0.85) when comparing different scanners, slice thicknesses or exposures. Most radiomic features were affected by slice thickness, but this effect could be reduced by resampling the CT-images before feature extraction. Statistics feature 'energy' was the most dependent on slice thickness. No clear correlation between feature values and exposures was observed. CT-scanner, slice thickness and bin width affected radiomic feature values, whereas no effect of exposure was observed. Optimization of gray-level discretization to potentially improve prognostic value can be performed without compromising feature stability. Resampling images prior to feature extraction decreases the variability of radiomic features.

Recently it has been shown that radiomic features of computed tomography (CT) have prognostic information in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We aim to validate this prognostic radiomic signature in stage IV adenocarcinoma patients undergoing chemotherapy. Two datasets of chemo-naive stage IV adenocarcinoma patients were investigated, dataset 1: 285 patients with CTs performed in a single center; dataset 2: 223 patients included in a multicenter clinical trial. The main exclusion criteria were EGFR mutation or unknown mutation status and non-delineated primary tumor. Radiomic features were calculated for the primary tumor. The c-index of cox regression was calculated and compared to the signature performance for overall survival (OS). In total CT scans from 195 patients were eligible for analysis. Patients having a prognostic index (PI) lower than the signature median (n = 92) had a significantly better OS than patients with a PI higher than the median (n = 103, HR 1.445, 95% CI 1.07-1.95, p = 0.02, c-index 0.576, 95% CI 0.527-0.624). The radiomic signature, derived from daily practice CT scans, has prognostic value for stage IV NSCLC, however the signature performs less than previously described for stage I-III NSCLC stages. In the future, machine learning techniques can potentially lead to a better prognostic imaging based model for stage IV NSCLC.

In 2017 the ACROP guideline on SBRT for peripherally located early stage NSCLC was published. Later that year ICRU-91 about prescribing, recording and reporting was published. The purpose of this study is to quantify the current variation in prescription practice in the institutions that contributed to the ACROP guideline and to establish the link between the ACROP and ICRU-91 recommendations. From each of the eight participating centres, 15 SBRT plans for stage I NSCLC were analyzed. Plans were generated following the institutional protocol, centres prescribed 3 × 13.5 Gy, 3 × 15 Gy, 3 × 17 Gy or 3 × 18 Gy. Dose parameters of the target volumes were reported as recommended by ICRU-91 and also converted to BED10Gy. The intra-institutional variance in D98%, Dmean and D2% of the PTV and GTV/ITV is substantially smaller than the inter-institutional spread, indicating well protocollised planning procedures are followed. The median values per centre ranged from 56.1 Gy to 73.1 Gy (D2%), 50.4 Gy to 63.3 Gy (Dmean) and 40.5 Gy to 53.6 Gy (D98%) for the PTV and from 57.1 Gy to 73.6 Gy (D2%), 53.7 Gy to 68.7 Gy (Dmean) and 48.5 Gy to 62.3 Gy (D98%) for the GTV/ITV. Comparing the variance in PTV D98% with the variance in GTV Dmean per centre, using an F-test, shows that four centres have a larger variance in GTV Dmean, while one centre has a larger variance in PTV D98% (p values <0.01). This shows some centres focus on achieving a constant PTV coverage while others aim at a constant GTV coverage. More detailed recommendations for dose planning and reporting of lung SBRT in line with ICRU-91 were formulated, including a minimum PTV D98% of 100 Gy BED10Gy and minimum GTV/ITV mean dose of 150 Gy BED10Gy and a D2% in the range of 60-70 Gy.

Background: Standardization protocols and guidelines for positron emission tomography (PET) in multicenter trials are available, despite a large variability in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters exist. In this study, we investigated the compliance of PET scans to the guidelines of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). From these results, we provide recommendations for future multicenter studies using PET. Material and methods: Patients included in a multicenter randomized phase II study had repeated PET scans for early response assessment. Relevant acquisition and reconstruction parameters were extracted from the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) header of the images. The PET image parameters were compared to the guidelines of the EANM for tumor imaging version 1.0 recommended parameters. Results: From the 223 included patients, 167 baseline scans and 118 response scans were available from 15 hospitals. Scans of 19% of the patients had an uptake time that fulfilled the Uniform Protocols for Imaging in Clinical Trials response assessment criteria. The average quality score over all hospitals was 69%. Scans with a non-compliant uptake time had a larger standard deviation of the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of the liver than scans with compliant uptake times. Conclusions: Although a standardization protocol was agreed on, there was a large variability in imaging parameters. For future, multicenter studies including PET imaging a prospective central quality review during patient inclusion is needed to improve compliance with image standardization protocols as defined by EANM.

PET-Plan: potential for dose escalation by target volume reduction in locally advanced NSCLC