Silvia Fiore

Prof. Dr. Silvia Fiore

Department of Engineering for Environment, Land and Infrastructures (DIATI) Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCarmen Teodosiu
Carmen Teodosiu
AGAndreea-Florina Gilca
Andreea-Florina Gilca
GBGEORGE BARJOVEANU
GEORGE BARJOVEANU
Silvia FioreSilvia Fiore
Silvia Fiore

1 April 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Fulvio BoanoFulvio Boano
Fulvio Boano
ACAlice Caruso
Alice Caruso
ECElisa Costamagna
Elisa Costamagna
LRLuca Ridolfi
Luca Ridolfi
Silvia FioreSilvia Fiore
Silvia Fiore
Fabio MasiFabio Masi
Fabio Masi
Recognizing greywater as a relevant secondary source of water and nutrients represents an important chance for the sustainable management of water resource. In the last two decades, many studies analysed the environmental, economic, and energetic benefits of the reuse of greywater treated by nature-based solutions (NBS). This work reviews existing case studies of traditional constructed wetlands and new integrated technologies (e.g., green roofs and green walls) for greywater treatment and reuse, with a specific focus on their treatment performance as a function of hydraulic operating parameters. The aim of this work is to understand if the application of NBS can represent a valid alternative to conventional treatment technologies, providing quantitative indications for their design. Specifically, indications concerning threshold values of hydraulic design parameters to guarantee high removal performance are suggested. Finally, the existing literature on life cycle analysis of NBS for greywater treatment has been examined, confirming the provided environmental benefits.

1 January 2016 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDeborah Panepinto
Deborah Panepinto
Silvia FioreSilvia Fiore
Silvia Fiore
MZMariantonia Zappone
Mariantonia Zappone
GGGiuseppe Genon
Giuseppe Genon
LMLorenza Meucci
Lorenza Meucci

1 February 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPDaniel Pleissner
Daniel Pleissner
FDFrancesca Demichelis
Francesca Demichelis
SMSilvia Mariano
Silvia Mariano
Silvia FioreSilvia Fiore
Silvia Fiore
IGIvette Michelle Navarro Gutiérrez
Ivette Michelle Navarro Gutiérrez
Joachim VenusJoachim Venus
Joachim Venus
This study introduces to a one-step process for the fermentative production of L(þ)-lactic acid from mixed restaurant food waste. Food waste was used as carbon and nitrogen source in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) using Lactobacillus sp. or Streptococcus sp. strains for L(þ)-lactic acid production. Waste consisted of (w/w) 33.5% starch, 14.8% proteins, 12.9% fat and 8.5% free sugars. Lactobacillus sp. strains showed a productivity of 0.27e0.53 g L1 h1 and a yield of 0.07e0.14 g g1 of theoretically available sugars, while Streptococcus sp. more efficiently degraded the food waste material and produced lactic acid at a maximum rate of 2.16 g L1 h1 and a yield of 0.81 g g1. For SSF, no enzymes were added or other hydrolytic treatments were carried out. Outcomes revealed a linear relationship between lactic acid concentration and solid-to-liquid ratio when Streptococcus sp. was applied. Statistically, from a 20% (w/w) dry food waste blend 52.4 g L1 lactic acid can be produced. Experimentally, 58 g L1 was achieved in presence of 20% (w/w), which was the highest solid-to-liquid ratio that could be treated using the equipment applied. Irrespective if SSF was performed at laboratory or technical scale, or under non-sterile conditions, Streptococcus sp. efficiently liquefied food waste and converted the released nutrients directly into lactic acid without considerable production of other organic acids, such as acetic acid. Downstream processing including micro- and nanofiltration, electrodialysis, chromatography and distillation gave a pure 702 g L1 L(þ)-lactic acid formulatio

26 June 2024 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SASinem Hazal Akyildiz
Sinem Hazal Akyildiz
Silvia FioreSilvia Fiore
Silvia Fiore
MBMartina Bruno
Martina Bruno
HSHande Sezgin
Hande Sezgin
IYIpek Yalcin-Enis
Ipek Yalcin-Enis
Rossana BellopedeRossana Bellopede
Rossana Bellopede
Textile materials are one of the primary sources of microplastic pollution. The washing procedure is by far the most significant way that textile products release microplastic fibers (MPFs). Therefore, in this study, the effects of various textile raw materials (A acrylic, PA polyamide, PET polyester, RPET recycled polyester and PP polypropylene), fabric construction properties (woven, knitted), thickness and basis weight values on MPFs release at different washing stages (pre-washing, soaping/rinsing) were examined separately. To mimic the most popular home washing procedures, a 10-min pre-wash and a 35-min soaping/rinsing phase at 40 °C were selected for the washing procedure. Utilizing the Image J program on macroscopic images captured by a high-resolution SL. R camera, the microfibers collected by filtering the water have been visually counted. According to the results, knitted fabrics released fewer MPFs than woven fabrics, with the woven acrylic sample (A3-w) exhibiting the highest release (2405 MPFs). The number of MPFs increased along with the thickness and weight of the fabric. Recycled polyester was found to release more MPFs than virgin polyester under the same conditions (1193 MPFs vs. 908 MPFs). This study demonstrates how recycled polyester, although initially an environmentally beneficial solution, can eventually become detrimental to the environment. Furthermore, it is known that the pre-washing procedure-which is optional-releases a lot more MPFs than the soaping and rinsing procedures, and that stopping this procedure will drastically lower the amount of MPFs incorporated into the water.

1 October 2017 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesca DemichelisFrancesca Demichelis
Francesca Demichelis
DPDaniel Pleissner
Daniel Pleissner
Silvia FioreSilvia Fiore
Silvia Fiore
SMSilvia Mariano
Silvia Mariano
IGIvette Michelle Navarro Gutiérrez
Ivette Michelle Navarro Gutiérrez
Joachim VenusJoachim Venus
Joachim Venus