María Ángeles Martínez Calvo

Dr. María Ángeles Martínez Calvo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 March 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SÍSaúl Íñiguez-Macedo
Saúl Íñiguez-Macedo
Ruben Lostado LorzaRuben Lostado Lorza
Ruben Lostado Lorza
Rubén Escribano-GarcíaRubén Escribano-García
Rubén Escribano-García
MCMaría Ángeles Martínez Calvo
María Ángeles Martínez Calvo
The experimental stress-strain curves from the standardized tests of Tensile, Plane Stress, Compression, Volumetric Compression, and Shear, are normally used to obtain the invariant λi and constants of material Ci that will define the behavior elastomers. Obtaining these experimental curves requires the use of expensive and complex experimental equipment. For years, a direct method called model updating, which is based on the combination of parameterized finite element (FE) models and experimental force-displacement curves, which are simpler and more economical than stress-strain curves, has been used to obtain the Ci constants. Model updating has the disadvantage of requiring a high computational cost when it is used without the support of any known optimization method or when the number of standardized tests and required Ci constants is high. This paper proposes a methodology that combines the model updating method, the mentioned standardized tests and the multi-response surface method (MRS) with desirability functions to automatically determine the most appropriate Ci constants for modeling the behavior of a group of elastomers. For each standardized test, quadratic regression models were generated for modeling the error functions (ER), which represent the distance between the force-displacement curves that were obtained experimentally and those that were obtained by means of the parameterized FE models. The process of adjusting each Ci constant was carried out with desirability functions, considering the same value of importance for all of the standardized tests. As a practical example, the proposed methodology was validated with the following elastomers: nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) and polyurethane (PUR). Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden, Arruda–Boyce and Gent were considered as the hyper-elastic models for modeling the mechanical behavior of the mentioned elastomers. The validation results, after the Ci parameters were adjusted, showed that the Mooney–Rivlin model was the hyper-elastic model that has the least error of all materials studied (MAEnorm = 0.054 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.127 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.116 for EVA and MAEnorm = 0.061 for NBR). The small error obtained in the adjustment of the Ci constants, as well as the computational cost of new materials, suggests that the methodology that this paper proposes could be a simpler and more economical alternative to use to obtain the optimal Ci constants of any type of elastomer than other more sophisticated methods.

2 April 2018 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruben Lostado LorzaRuben Lostado Lorza
Ruben Lostado Lorza
Rubén Escribano-GarcíaRubén Escribano-García
Rubén Escribano-García
RMRoberto Fernandez Martinez
Roberto Fernandez Martinez
MCMaría Ángeles Martínez Calvo
María Ángeles Martínez Calvo
To ensure realistic results when modeling welded joints using the finite element method (FEM), it is essential to appropriately characterize the thermo-mechanical behavior of the elastic-plastic Finite Element (FE) models. This task is complex. Any small differences between the actual welded joints and the welded joints based on FEM can be amplified enormously in the presence of nonlinearities. Due to the intense concentration of heat on a small area to create such joints, the regions near the weld line undergo severe thermal cycles. These generate significant angular distortion due mainly to the residual stresses. This paper proposes a method to determine the parameters that are most appropriate for modeling the Butt joint single V-groove welded joint FE models’ thermo-mechanical behavior that were created by the one-pass Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW). The method is based on experimental data, as well as genetic algorithms (GA) with multi-objective functions. As a practical example, the proposed methodology is validated with three different welded joints specimens that are manufactured by different voltages and currents (26 volts and 140 amps, 28 volts and 210 amps, and 35 volts and 260 amps). The electrode orientation, shielding gas flow rate, distance between nozzle and plate, and welding speed were considered to be constant for all of the specimens that were studied, and their values were 80°, 20.0 L/min, 4.0 mm, and 6 mm/s, respectively. The base material was EN 235JR low carbon steel, whereas the weld bead was ER70S-6 for the three specimens that were welded. An agreement between the temperature field and the angular distortion that was obtained by the adjusted FE models and those that were obtained experimentally demonstrates that the proposed methodology may be valid for automatically determining the most appropriate parameters.

13 April 2017 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruben Lostado LorzaRuben Lostado Lorza
Ruben Lostado Lorza
Marina Corral BobadillaMarina Corral Bobadilla
Marina Corral Bobadilla
MCMaría Ángeles Martínez Calvo
María Ángeles Martínez Calvo
PRPedro María Villanueva Roldán
Pedro María Villanueva Roldán
Due to the intense concentration of heat in a reduced area when Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) is used to join mechanical components, the regions near the weld bead are subjected to severe thermal cycles. Firstly, the region close to the weld bead that is heated tends to be in compression and, when it cools, tends to be in tension. According to Pilipenko, the material is exposed to elastic compression and, then, reaching the yield limit, undergoes plastic deformation with the appearance of residual stresses followed by elastic-plastic unloading. This could be considered as a strain-stress cycle. This paper applies plastic-strain-range memorization based on time-independent cyclic plasticity theory for butt joints with single V-groove Finite Element (FE) models that were manufactured by GMAW. The theory combines both the isotropic hardening and the nonlinear kinematic hardening rule (Chaboche model) to reproduce the behavior of cyclic plasticity and thus to obtain the residual stresses in welded joint FE models. As a practical example, the proposed theory is validated by three welded joint specimens that were manufactured with different input parameters of speed, voltage, and current. An agreement between the residual stresses obtained by the FE model proposed and those obtained experimentally by the hole drilling method at different depths demonstrates that the proposed theory could be valid for modelling the residual stresses in welded joints when cyclic plasticity is considered over the range of speed, voltage, and current studied.

30 August 2016 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruben Lostado LorzaRuben Lostado Lorza
Ruben Lostado Lorza
Rubén Escribano-GarcíaRubén Escribano-García
Rubén Escribano-García
MCMaría Ángeles Martínez Calvo
María Ángeles Martínez Calvo
RMRodolfo Múgica-Vidal
Rodolfo Múgica-Vidal
Gas metal arc welding (GMAW) is a joining process that is controlled by several inputs or welding parameters. However, speed, current and voltage are the parameters that are most frequently used in setting this process. Cord area, yield stress, tensile strength, residual stresses, hardness and roughness are considered to be outputs or welded joints parameters. They are widely used when the design requirements are based on the cost, manufacturing speed, strength and surface finish. This paper seeks to determine the relationship between the welding parameters and the welded joint parameters of speed, current and voltage in butt joints (X-groove) of EN 235JR by the response surface method (RSM). The optimal joints when considering the design requirements of cost, manufacturing speed, strength and surface finish were achieved by using the multi-response surface (MRS). The optimal welding parameters reached when considering the design requirements of cost were 140.593 amps, 8.192 mm/s and 29.999 volts, respectively, whereas the design requirements of manufacturing speed were 149.88 amps, 9.261 mm/s and 29.999 volts. Finally, the welding parameters for the design requirements of joint strength and surface finish were 149.086 amps, 7.139 mm/s and 28.541 volts and 150.372 amps, 8.561 mm/s and 29.877 volts, respectively.

11 September 2018 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ruben Lostado LorzaRuben Lostado Lorza
Ruben Lostado Lorza
MCMaría Ángeles Martínez Calvo
María Ángeles Martínez Calvo
Carlos BerlangaCarlos Berlanga
Carlos Berlanga
Pedro J. RiveroPedro J. Rivero
Pedro J. Rivero
Zinc electroplating is a coating process controlled by several input process parameters. However, the commonly used input parameters for setting the process of zinc deposition are current density, temperature of the coating solution, zinc concentration, deposition time, and concentration of additives (conditioner and brightener). The power consumed in the zinc plating process, coating thickness, increase in coating mass, and corrosion resistance are considered to be outputs or zinc coating parameters. They are widely used when the zinc coating requirements are based on the coating process cost, coating process speed, corrosion resistance, and coating thickness. This paper seeks to determine regression models by the response surface method (RSM) that relate the zinc coating parameters to the input parameters in steel screws. When considering the coating requirements of cost, coating process speed, corrosion resistance, and coating thickness, the optimal input parameters were found by using a multi-response surface (MRS). Input parameters of 0.3 amps/dm2, 20.0 °C, 13.9 g/L, 45 min, 28.5 mL/L, and 2.8 mL/L, respectively (relative to the commonly used input parameters detailed above), were obtained when considering the cost. Considering minimization of the deposition time, the input parameters obtained were 0.5 amps/dm2, 24.6 °C, 13.9 g/L, 45 min, 26.9 mL/L, and 1.1 mL/L, respectively. The optimal inputs to maximize the corrosion resistance were 0.6 amps/dm2, 32.4 °C, 14.0 g/L, 45 min, 28.7 mL/L, and 2.5 mL/L, respectively. Finally, when maximizing the coating thickness, the inputs were 0.7 amps/dm2, 38.4 °C, 12.2 g/L, 45 min, 26.5 mL/L, and 1.5 mL/L, respectively.

18 December 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DTD. Tobalina-Baldeon
D. Tobalina-Baldeon
FSFelix Sanz-Adan
Felix Sanz-Adan
MCMaría Ángeles Martínez Calvo
María Ángeles Martínez Calvo
JACINTO SANTAMARIA-PEÑAJACINTO SANTAMARIA-PEÑA
JACINTO SANTAMARIA-PEÑA
Continuous Fibers-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites (CFRTP) are presented as light materials, capable of offering a short production time with the possibility of being recycled. These properties make them ideal for automotive applications, aiming to reduce the consumption and emission of polluting gases. This article analyzed the dynamic tensile stress-compressive stress behavior of CFRTP in structural elements of the car with anti-vibration and damping functions. The data available in the literature on the reliable and usual compliance of the properties required for CFRTP, to be applied in the automotive structural elements, is scarce and insufficient. In order to analyze whether CFRTP feeds the demanding requirements of car manufacturers and if they provide advantages over the metal materials currently used, this article developed a method of reliable verification of their dynamic tensile and compression behavior. The methodology developed could be used as a guide to characterizing any combination of vulcanized rubber adhesive joints with CFRTP, regardless of the materials and additives used. The results obtained showed that there exists CFRTP that fits the requirements of the car manufacturers for this type of component and also offers dynamic advantages over the materials currently used as anti-vibration elements.