Josh Eichman

Josh Eichman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFelix Cebulla
Felix Cebulla
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
WNWolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak
PMPierluigi Mancarella
Pierluigi Mancarella

1 August 2017 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPeng Hou
Peng Hou
PEPeter Enevoldsen
Peter Enevoldsen
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
WHWeihao Hu
Weihao Hu
MJMark Jacobson
Mark Jacobson
Zhe ChenZhe Chen
Zhe Chen

1 September 2018 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DWDai Wang
Dai Wang
MMMatteo Muratori
Matteo Muratori
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
MWMax Wei
Max Wei
SSSamveg Saxena
Samveg Saxena
CZCong Zhang
Cong Zhang

9 September 2022 in Batteries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tomás MontesTomás Montes
Tomás Montes
MEMaite Etxandi-Santolaya
Maite Etxandi-Santolaya
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
VFVictor José Ferreira
Victor José Ferreira
LTLluis Trilla
Lluis Trilla
Cristina CorcheroCristina Corchero
Cristina Corchero
Using batteries after their first life in an Electric Vehicle (EV) represents an opportunity to reduce the environmental impact and increase the economic benefits before recycling the battery. Many different second life applications have been proposed, each with multiple criteria that have to be taken into consideration when deciding the most suitable course of action. In this article, a battery assessment procedure is proposed that consolidates and expands upon the approaches in the literature, and facilitates the decision-making process for a battery after it has reached the end of its first life. The procedure is composed of three stages, including an evaluation of the state of the battery, an evaluation of the technical viability and an economic evaluation. Options for battery configurations are explored (pack direct use, stack of battery packs, module direct use, pack refurbish with modules, pack refurbish with cells). By comparing these configurations with the technical requirements for second life applications, a reader can rapidly understand the tradeoffs and practical strategies for how best to implement second life batteries for their specific application. Lastly, an economic evaluation process is developed to determine the cost of implementing various second life battery configurations and the revenue for different end use applications. An example of the battery assessment procedure is included to demonstrate how it could be carried out.

19 July 2017
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
DSDaniel Steinberg
Daniel Steinberg
DBDave Bielen
Dave Bielen
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
KEKelly Eurek
Kelly Eurek
JLJeffrey Logan
Jeffrey Logan
EWEric J.H. Wilson
Eric J.H. Wilson
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information

1 September 2014
Verified
Report
Closed access
PDF file
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
KHK. Harrison
K. Harrison
MPM. Peters
M. Peters
The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information