Jannik Haas

Mr. Jannik Haas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFelix Cebulla
Felix Cebulla
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
JEJosh Eichman
Josh Eichman
WNWolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak
PMPierluigi Mancarella
Pierluigi Mancarella

1 February 2020 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
JKJ. Khalighi
J. Khalighi
AFAlberto De la Fuente
Alberto De la Fuente
SGS.U. Gerbersdorf
S.U. Gerbersdorf
WNWolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak
PCPo-Jung Chen
Po-Jung Chen

1 December 2017 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
FCF. Cebulla
F. Cebulla
KCK. Cao
K. Cao
WNWolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak
RPRodrigo Palma
Rodrigo Palma
PMP. Mancarella
P. Mancarella
Expansion planning models are often used to support investment decisions in the power sector. Towards the massive insertion of renewable energy sources, expansion planning of energy storage systems (SEP - Storage Expansion Planning) is becoming more popular. However, to date, there is no clear overview of the available SEP models in the literature. To shed light on the existing approaches, this review paper presents a broad classification of SEP, which is used to analyze a database of about 90 publications to identify trends and challenges. The trends we found are that while SEP was born more than four decades ago, only in the last five years increasing research efforts were put into the topic. The planning has evolved from adequacy criteria to broader targets, such as direct costs, mitigation of CO2 emissions, and renewable integration. The modeling of the network, power system, energy storage systems (ESS), and time resolution are becoming more detailed. Uncertainty is often considered and the solution methods are still very diverse. As outstanding challenges, we found that (1) the large diversity of ESS, in contrast to conventional generation technologies, and (2) the complex lifetime and efficiency functions need to be addressed in the models. (3) Only a high temporal and spatial resolution will allow for dimensioning the challenge of integrating renewables and the role of ESS. (4) Although the value of ESS lies beyond shifting energy in time, current SEP is mostly blind to other system services. (5) Today, many flexibility options are available, but they are often assessed separately. In the same line, although cross-sectorial (power, heat, transport, water) SEP is becoming more frequent, there are many open tasks towards an integrated coordination. The planning of future energy systems will be multi-sectorial and multi-objective, consider the multi-services of ESS, and will inherently require interdisciplinary efforts

1 December 2018 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
FCF. Cebulla
F. Cebulla
WNWolfgang Nowak
Wolfgang Nowak
CRC. Rahmann
C. Rahmann
RPRodrigo Palma
Rodrigo Palma

1 May 2019 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDimitrij Chudinzow
Dimitrij Chudinzow
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
GDGustavo Díaz-Ferrán
Gustavo Díaz-Ferrán
SMSimón Moreno-Leiva
Simón Moreno-Leiva
LELudger Eltrop
Ludger Eltrop

1 October 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSimón Moreno-Leiva
Simón Moreno-Leiva
GDGustavo Díaz-Ferrán
Gustavo Díaz-Ferrán
JHJannik Haas
Jannik Haas
TTThomas Telsnig
Thomas Telsnig
FDFelipe A. Díaz-Alvarado
Felipe A. Díaz-Alvarado
LELudger Eltrop
Ludger Eltrop