Mucositis is one of the most common debilitating side effects related to chemotherapy (CT), radiation therapy (RT), targeted agents and immunotherapy. It is a complex process potentially involving any portion of the gastrointestinal tract and injuring the mucosa, leading to inflammatory or ulcerative lesions. Mechanisms and clinical presentation can differ according both to the anatomic site involved (oral or gastrointestinal) and the treatment received. Understanding the pathophysiology and management of mucosal injury as a secondary effect of anti-cancer treatment is an important area of clinical research. Prophylaxis, early diagnosis, and adequate management of complications are essential to increase therapeutic success and, thus, improve the survival outcomes of cancer patients. This review focuses on the pathobiology and management guidelines for mucositis, a secondary effect of old and new anti-cancer treatments, highlighting recent advances in prevention and discussing future research options.

Liquid biopsy has already proven effective in aiding diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment personalization in several malignancies, and it could represent a practice-changing tool also in biliary tract cancer, even though clinical applications are currently still limited. It is promising for early diagnosis, especially in high-risk populations, and several studies on circulating free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumour cells and differential microRNA (miRNA) profiles in this setting are ongoing. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) also appears as a feasible noninvasive biomarker in the curative setting, in detecting minimal residual disease after resection and in monitoring disease recurrence. As of today, it can be particularly valuable in biliary tract cancer for genomic profiling, with a good concordance with tissue samples for most molecular alterations. CtDNA analysis may especially be considered in clinical practice when the tumour tissue is not sufficient for next-generation sequencing, or when urgent therapeutic decisions are needed. Moreover, it offers the possibility of providing a real-time picture to monitor treatment response and dynamically identify resistance mutations, potentially representing a way to optimize treatment strategies.

Background: Emerging data suggest that gender-related immune system composition affects both immune response and efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer patients (pts). This study aimed to investigate the sex-related prognostic role of MLR in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) pts. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective consecutive cohort of 490 mCRC patients treated from 2009 to 2018 at the Oncology Departments of Aviano and Pordenone (training set) and Udine (validation set), Italy. The prognostic impact of MLR on overall survival (OS) was evaluated with uni- and multivariable Cox regression models. The best cut-off value to predict survival was defined through ROC analyses. Results: Overall, we identified 288 males (59%) and 202 females (41%); 161 patients (33%) had a right-sided, 202 (42%) a left-sided primary, and 122 (25%) a rectal tumor. Interestingly, gender was associated with MLR (p = 0.004) and sidedness (p = 0.006). The obtained cut-off value for MLR in females and males was 0.27 and 0.49, respectively. According to univariate analysis of the training set, MLR (HR 9.07, p ≤ 0.001), MLR > 0.27 in females (HR 1.95, p = 0.003), and MLR > 0.49 in males (HR 2.65, p = 0.010) were associated with poorer OS, which was also confirmed in the validation set. In multivariate analysis, MLR > 0.27 in females (HR 2.77, p = 0.002), MLR > 0.49 in males (HR 5.39, p ≤ 0.001), BRAF mutation (HR 3.38, p ≤ 0.001), and peritoneal metastases (HR 2.50, p = 0.003) were still independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Males and females have a different immune response. Our study showed that high MLR, both in males and females, is an unfavorable Independent prognostic factor. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare disease for which scarce evidence is available. We summarized data available on systemic treatment of advanced SBA. Methods: Scientific literature was evaluated to find phase II or phase III clinical trials on systemic treatment for advanced SBA. MeSH terms were selected and combined for the initial search, then inclusion and exclusion criteria were set in a search protocol. Four medical oncologists looked for evidence on Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Moreover, abstracts from 2016 to June 2021 from the American Society for Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium and World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer were browsed. The selected studies, matching the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were finally tabulated and analyzed. Results: The trials finally selected were 18 phase II/III clinical trials. Four small phase II trials support the activity of oxaliplatin-based doublets in first-line treatment (CAPOX and mFOLFOX). Conclusion: No good level evidence is available on the use of bevacizumab, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor, targeted agents or immunotherapy. First-line treatments are largely derived from colorectal cancer protocols, mainly oxaliplatin-based doublets.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) represents the third most common cancer worldwide. Approximately 20% of patients present with metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 30–50% experience disease recurrence over time. For metastatic CRC (mCRC), the standard treatment consists of chemotherapy combined with a targeted agent based on molecular profile, such as RAS, BRAF, and MSI status. Anti-angiogenic drugs, which inhibit the formation of new blood vessels, have an established role in the management of mCRC. Mounting evidence highlights the critical interplay among angiogenesis, hypoxia, and the immune response in tumor progression. These insights have paved the way for testing novel combinations and molecules to control cancer progression. In particular, combining anti-angiogenic agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown promise in improving outcomes for mCRC patients. Among emerging therapies, the novel anti-angiogenic agent fruquintinib has recently demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of mCRC. Based on the data discussed in the present narrative review, the therapeutic landscape of mCRC appears poised for significant evolution in the near future. While numerous challenges and unanswered questions remain, the emergence of innovative therapeutic combinations and agents provides a promising opportunity for improving patient outcomes in mCRC.