Liquid biopsy has already proven effective in aiding diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment personalization in several malignancies, and it could represent a practice-changing tool also in biliary tract cancer, even though clinical applications are currently still limited. It is promising for early diagnosis, especially in high-risk populations, and several studies on circulating free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumour cells and differential microRNA (miRNA) profiles in this setting are ongoing. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) also appears as a feasible noninvasive biomarker in the curative setting, in detecting minimal residual disease after resection and in monitoring disease recurrence. As of today, it can be particularly valuable in biliary tract cancer for genomic profiling, with a good concordance with tissue samples for most molecular alterations. CtDNA analysis may especially be considered in clinical practice when the tumour tissue is not sufficient for next-generation sequencing, or when urgent therapeutic decisions are needed. Moreover, it offers the possibility of providing a real-time picture to monitor treatment response and dynamically identify resistance mutations, potentially representing a way to optimize treatment strategies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are described in 10–15% of Caucasian patients and in 50% of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the therapeutic scenario and has changed the natural history of the disease. Despite the results obtained with osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, most patients experience disease progression. The search for new therapeutic strategies both to enhance first-line treatment and to ensure adequate second-line therapies represents an unmet medical need, towards which all efforts are being concentrated. In this review, we describe the main strategies identified to improve the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a separate entity with a different biology and prognosis compared to stage IV NSCLC. Challenges range from the very definition of oligometastatic disease to the timing and techniques of local treatments, and their benefit in prolonging patient survival. Most of the international consensus and guidelines agree on the need for shared criteria, such as appropriate stadiation and even tissue biopsy if needed, in order to select patients that could really benefit from personalised strategies. Multidisciplinary evaluation is crucial in order to define if every lesion is amenable to radical local treatment, which appears to be the most important criterion across different guidelines. A distinction must be made depending on the time of oligo-disease detection, separating de novo oligometastatic disease from oligorecurrence, oligoprogression and oligoresidual disease. These separate entities imply a different biology and prognosis, and treatment strategies consequently must be tailored. Locoregional approaches are therefore often contemplated in order to ensure the best outcome for the patient. In non-oncogene-addicted disease, the advent of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) allows physicians to take into consideration consolidative treatments, but timing, technique and subsequent systemic treatment remain open issues. In oncogene-addicted NSCLC, local treatments are nowadays preferably reserved to cases of oligoprogression, but the advent of new, more potent drugs might challenge that. In this review, we summarised the current knowledge, consensuses and data from retrospective and prospective trials, with the aim of shedding some light on the topic and emphasising the unmet clinical need.

Since the discovery of the first-generation ALK inhibitor, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective in the first line or further lines of treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EMLA4-ALK translocation. This review traces the main milestones in the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic patients and the survival outcomes in the first-line and second-line settings with different ALK inhibitors. It presents the two options available for first-line treatment at the present time: sequencing different ALK inhibitors versus using the most potent inhibitor in front-line treatment. The efficacy outcomes of different ALK inhibitors in the first-line setting; the molecular profile of the disease, including mutation resistances and ALK variants and co-mutations; and patients’ co-morbidities and inhibitor toxicities should be taken into account to address the choice of the first-line treatment, as suggested in this review.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The discovery of specific driver mutations has revolutionized the treatment landscape of oncogene-addicted NSCLC through targeted therapies, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated limited effectiveness in this context. Emerging evidence, though, reveals significant heterogeneity among different driver mutation subgroups, suggesting that certain patient subsets may benefit from ICIs, particularly when combined with other therapeutic modalities. In this review, we comprehensively examine the current evidence on the efficacy of immunotherapy in oncogene-addicted NSCLC. By analyzing recent clinical trials and preclinical studies, along with an overview of mechanisms that may reduce immunotherapy efficacy, we explored potential strategies to address these challenges, to provide insights that could optimize immunotherapy approaches and integrate them effectively into the treatment algorithm for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

The treatment of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionised by the introduction of targeted therapies. With the improvement of response and frequently of overall survival, however, a whole new set of adverse events emerged. In fact, due to the peculiar mechanism of action of each one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies, every drug has its own specific safety profile. In addition, this safety profile could not fully emerge from clinical trials data, as patients in clinical practice usually have more comorbidities and frailties. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known and established adverse event of anti-cancer therapies. However, only recently it has become a central topic for targeted therapies in NSCLC, due to the unknown real range and frequency. Management of this toxicity begins with prevention, and must balance the need of continuing an effective anticancer treatment versus low risk of even fatal events and the preservation of long-term quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarise the current knowledge focusing on currently used targeted therapies in NSCLC.