Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have revolutionized the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, one-dose-fits-all maximalist regimens have been considered the standard of care, with ICBs administered at flat doses regardless of patients’ weight. Treatment duration with ICBs is often arbitrary across stages, ranging from a fixed time point to until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ICBs differ significantly from those of traditional cytotoxic drugs and the approved and selected doses on the basis of the maximum tolerated dose are often overestimated as there is limited evidence supporting a direct relationship between therapeutic intensity and outcomes. This can lead to overtreatment of patients, resulting in an increased risk of toxicity without enhanced efficacy. In addition, the use of these drugs is associated with significant costs that burden the global health care system and exacerbate disparities in access to care. De-escalating treatment by reducing the dose, duration, and frequency of administration of ICBs could optimize treatment efficacy, reduce toxicities, improve patients' quality of life, and even decrease costs. Ultimately, de-escalation strategies may help to reduce treatment inequalities and to improve drug access worldwide. The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss the main issues and challenges regarding the de-escalation of ICBs in patients with NSCLC, focusing on dose-intensity reduction and treatment duration selection. Moreover, we assess the economic impact of implementing de-escalation approaches.

Liquid biopsy has already proven effective in aiding diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment personalization in several malignancies, and it could represent a practice-changing tool also in biliary tract cancer, even though clinical applications are currently still limited. It is promising for early diagnosis, especially in high-risk populations, and several studies on circulating free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumour cells and differential microRNA (miRNA) profiles in this setting are ongoing. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) also appears as a feasible noninvasive biomarker in the curative setting, in detecting minimal residual disease after resection and in monitoring disease recurrence. As of today, it can be particularly valuable in biliary tract cancer for genomic profiling, with a good concordance with tissue samples for most molecular alterations. CtDNA analysis may especially be considered in clinical practice when the tumour tissue is not sufficient for next-generation sequencing, or when urgent therapeutic decisions are needed. Moreover, it offers the possibility of providing a real-time picture to monitor treatment response and dynamically identify resistance mutations, potentially representing a way to optimize treatment strategies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are described in 10–15% of Caucasian patients and in 50% of Asian patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the therapeutic scenario and has changed the natural history of the disease. Despite the results obtained with osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, most patients experience disease progression. The search for new therapeutic strategies both to enhance first-line treatment and to ensure adequate second-line therapies represents an unmet medical need, towards which all efforts are being concentrated. In this review, we describe the main strategies identified to improve the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Since the discovery of the first-generation ALK inhibitor, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective in the first line or further lines of treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EMLA4-ALK translocation. This review traces the main milestones in the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic patients and the survival outcomes in the first-line and second-line settings with different ALK inhibitors. It presents the two options available for first-line treatment at the present time: sequencing different ALK inhibitors versus using the most potent inhibitor in front-line treatment. The efficacy outcomes of different ALK inhibitors in the first-line setting; the molecular profile of the disease, including mutation resistances and ALK variants and co-mutations; and patients’ co-morbidities and inhibitor toxicities should be taken into account to address the choice of the first-line treatment, as suggested in this review.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The discovery of specific driver mutations has revolutionized the treatment landscape of oncogene-addicted NSCLC through targeted therapies, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated limited effectiveness in this context. Emerging evidence, though, reveals significant heterogeneity among different driver mutation subgroups, suggesting that certain patient subsets may benefit from ICIs, particularly when combined with other therapeutic modalities. In this review, we comprehensively examine the current evidence on the efficacy of immunotherapy in oncogene-addicted NSCLC. By analyzing recent clinical trials and preclinical studies, along with an overview of mechanisms that may reduce immunotherapy efficacy, we explored potential strategies to address these challenges, to provide insights that could optimize immunotherapy approaches and integrate them effectively into the treatment algorithm for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.