Adam Paul Richards

Mr. Adam Paul Richards

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 April 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
David EagerDavid Eager
David Eager
SZShilei Zhou
Shilei Zhou
KIKarlos Ishac
Karlos Ishac
MHMd Imam Hossain
Md Imam Hossain
ARAdam Paul Richards
Adam Paul Richards
Lisa N SharwoodLisa N Sharwood
Lisa N Sharwood
Double bounce is an unusual and potentially very hazardous phenomenon that most trampoline users may have experienced, yet few would have really understood how and why it occurs. This paper provides an in-depth investigation into the double bounce. Firstly, the static and dynamic characteristics of a recreational trampoline are analysed theoretically and verified through experiments. Then, based on the developed trampoline dynamic model, double bounce simulation is conducted with two medicine balls released with different time delays. Through simulation, the process of double bounce is presented in detail, which comprehensively reveals how energy is transferred between users during double bounce. Furthermore, the effect of release time delay on double bounce is also presented. Finally, we conducted an experiment which produced similar results to the simulation and validated the reliability of the trampoline dynamic model and double bounce theoretical analysis.

5 April 2022 in Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TWTom Whyte
Tom Whyte
ELEdward Lind
Edward Lind
ARAdam Paul Richards
Adam Paul Richards
David EagerDavid Eager
David Eager
LBLynne E. Bilston
Lynne E. Bilston
Julie BrownJulie Brown
Julie Brown
Serious cervical spine injuries have been documented from falls into foam pits at trampoline parks. To address the lack of evidence on how foam pits should be designed for mitigating neck injury risk, this study aimed to quantify neck loads during head-first entry into varying foam pit designs. An instrumented Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device was dropped head-first from a height of up to 1.5 m into three differently constructed foam pits, each using a different mechanism to prevent direct contact between the falling person and the floor (foam slab, trampoline or net bed). Measured neck loads were compared to published injury reference values. In the simplest, foam-only pit design, increasing foam depth tended to reduce peak compressive force. At least one injury assessment reference metric was exceeded in all pit conditions tested for 1.5 m falls, most commonly the time-dependent neck compression criterion. The results highlight the importance of adequate foam depth in combination with appropriate pit design in minimizing injury risk. The risk of cervical spine injury may not be reduced sufficiently with current foam pit designs.