José Daniel Subiela

Dr. José Daniel Subiela

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 May 2025 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
PSPietro Scilipoti
Pietro Scilipoti
MAMario De Angelis
Mario De Angelis
PZPaolo Zaurito
Paolo Zaurito
GTGiovanni Tremolada
Giovanni Tremolada
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini
Objective: To report real‐world rates of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence and progression within a European multicentre cohort with detailed information on intravesical instillation courses, as contemporary data on oncological outcomes in NMIBC are limited.Patients and methods: A total of 1918 patients with NMIBC treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) were retrospectively identified from six tertiary‐referral European centres (2015–2022). Patients were stratified according to European Association of Urology 2021 criteria into low‐ (LR), intermediate‐ (IR), high‐ (HR) and very high‐risk (VHR) categories. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models addressing 5‐year rates of high‐grade (HG) recurrence and progression were fitted. Sensitivity analyses focused on patients receiving intravesical instillations and tested for the effect of adequate course (Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin: five or more induction + two or more maintenance instillations; mitomycin C: complete induction + ≥11 maintenance instillations).Results: Of all NMIBC patients identified, 467 (24.3%) were LR vs 582 (30.3%) IR vs 739 (38.5%) HR vs 130 (6.8%) VHR. The median (interquartile range) follow‐up after TURBT was 26 (12–46) months. The 5‐year HG recurrence rates were 7.2% in LR vs 17.3% in IR vs 26.7% in HR vs 30.9% in VHR patients, resulting in a three‐, five‐ and seven‐fold higher risk of IR, HR and VHR, respectively, relative to LR (all P < 0.001). The 5‐year progression rates were 3.9% in LR vs 5.2% in IR vs 13.6% in HR vs 31.6% in VHR patients, resulting in a six‐ and nine‐fold higher risk for HR and VHR, respectively, relative to LR (all P < 0.001). In all, 1001 (52.2%) patients underwent intravesical instillations. Those receiving adequate instillation course (244/1001 [24.3%]) had lower HG‐recurrence (hazard ratio 0.3, P < 0.001) and progression (hazard ratio 0.2, P = 0.001) risk.Conclusions: Patients with HR/VHR NMIBC face significantly higher HG recurrence and progression risks. While tailored treatment strategies are needed, adherence to adequate instillation course remains crucial for optimising oncological outcomes.

17 January 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJorge Esteban-Villarrubia
Jorge Esteban-Villarrubia
JTJavier Torres-Jiménez
Javier Torres-Jiménez
CBCarolina Bueno-Bravo
Carolina Bueno-Bravo
RGRebeca García-Mondaray
Rebeca García-Mondaray
JSJosé Daniel Subiela
José Daniel Subiela
PGPablo Gajate
Pablo Gajate
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, less than half of patients are candidates for this treatment, and 50% will develop metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be offered if neoadjuvant treatment has not been administered for suitable patients. It is important to reduce the risk of systemic recurrence and improve the prognosis of localized MIBC. Systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma has evolved in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates or FGFR inhibitors, are new therapeutic alternatives and have shown their benefit in advanced disease. Currently, several clinical trials are investigating the role of these drugs, as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with promising outcomes. In addition, the development of predictive biomarkers could predict responses to neoadjuvant therapies.

11 January 2025 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPietro Scilipoti
Pietro Scilipoti
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
MAMario De Angelis
Mario De Angelis
PZPaolo Zaurito
Paolo Zaurito
AMAlbane Massiet
Albane Massiet
UGUrothelial Carcinoma Working Group
Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group

13 February 2024 in European Urology Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJosé Daniel Subiela
José Daniel Subiela
WKWojciech Krajewski
Wojciech Krajewski
DGDaniel A. González-Padilla
Daniel A. González-Padilla
JLJan Laszkiewicz
Jan Laszkiewicz
JTJavier Taborda
Javier Taborda
FRFrancisco Javier Burgos Revilla
Francisco Javier Burgos Revilla

18 February 2025 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPietro Scilipoti
Pietro Scilipoti
MLMattia Longoni
Mattia Longoni
MAMario De Angelis
Mario De Angelis
PZPaolo Zaurito
Paolo Zaurito
ASAleksander Slusarczyk
Aleksander Slusarczyk
MMMarco Moschini
Marco Moschini

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMarta Lopez-Valcarcel
Marta Lopez-Valcarcel
FLFernando López-Campos
Fernando López-Campos
JMJuan Zafra Martín
Juan Zafra Martín
ICIrene Cienfuegos
Irene Cienfuegos
JSJosé Daniel Subiela
José Daniel Subiela
FCFelipe Counago
Felipe Counago
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been the primary biomarker used for the detection and monitoring of prostate cancer for decades. However, its limited specificity and prognostic accuracy have led to the development of novel molecular and imaging biomarkers aimed at improving the clinical characterization of localized disease. This review critically examines recent advances in urinary biomarkers (e.g., PCA3, SelectMDx), tissue-based genomic assays (Oncotype DX Prostate, Prolaris, Decipher), and imaging techniques such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PET-PSMA). We evaluate their diagnostic performance, prognostic value, and clinical utility in risk stratification and individualized treatment decision-making. Methodological and clinical barriers to their routine implementation are also discussed. Current evidence supports the multidisciplinary integration of these biomarkers to overcome the limitations of PSA, improve biopsy decision-making, better distinguish indolent from aggressive tumors, and optimize therapeutic strategies. Finally, future research directions aimed at validating and incorporating emerging biomarkers into clinical practice are outlined, with the goal of improving outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer.