Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann

Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 June 2022 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAurel-Claudiu Vartolomei
Aurel-Claudiu Vartolomei
Dan Cosmin SerbanoiuDan Cosmin Serbanoiu
Dan Cosmin Serbanoiu
DGDana Valentina Ghiga
Dana Valentina Ghiga
MMMarioara Moldovan
Marioara Moldovan
Stanca CucStanca Cuc
Stanca Cuc
MPMariana Pacurar
Mariana Pacurar
Friction is an intensely studied feature in orthodontics, as the sliding mechanics approach remains one of the most utilized techniques in current practice, and the question of whether self-ligating brackets produce less friction than conventional brackets still stands. The objective of this study was to compare a self-ligating system with different closing mechanisms and a conventional system with different ligating mechanisms regarding their frictional properties. Laboratory measurements were performed using an advanced materials testing machine generating tensile strength and load at maximum Load values, which were statistically analyzed and compared. These two parameters have been associated with the frictional resistance generated at the archwire–bracket slot interface. Statistically significant results were obtained when comparing the active self-ligating brackets with the passive self-ligating (tensile strength mean 1.953, SD 0.4231; load at maximum moad mean 6.000, SD 1.3000) and conventional brackets (tensile strength mean 1.953, SD 0.4231; load at maximum load mean 6.000, SD 1.3000), as well as when comparing the passive self-ligating brackets with the conventional brackets (tensile strength mean 1.708, SD 0.8628; load at maximum load mean 5.254, SD 2.645). The active self-ligating brackets tended to produce more friction when compared to the passive self-ligating brackets but were similar to conventional brackets with stainless steel ligatures.

21 October 2022 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAurel-Claudiu Vartolomei
Aurel-Claudiu Vartolomei
DGDana Valentina Ghiga
Dana Valentina Ghiga
Dan Cosmin SerbanoiuDan Cosmin Serbanoiu
Dan Cosmin Serbanoiu
MMMarioara Moldovan
Marioara Moldovan
Stanca CucStanca Cuc
Stanca Cuc
MPMaria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann
Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann
Adhesion remains a key element in dentistry, whether approached in prosthetics, odontology, or orthodontics. It is a continuously researched aspect, as improved materials and adhesive methods keep emerging in the market. No orthodontic treatment can be effective without the proper adhesion strength of the bonded elements on the teeth. The objective of this research, in the broad context of self-ligating versus conventional brackets, was to compare active and passive self-ligating systems with a conventional one by conducting an in vitro study on human-extracted premolars. Shear bond strength tests were executed by means of an advanced materials-testing machine that generated maximum load and tensile strength values. The data obtained underwent statistical analysis with a statistical threshold of p < 0.05. The results regarding the statistical significance were acquired when comparing the passive self-ligating system with the active self-ligating and conventional systems (load-at-maximum-load mean 204.9, SD 91.09, and p < 0.05). In this study, the passive self-ligating bracket system appears to present increased shear bond strength.