Hassan Shaban

Dr. Hassan Shaban


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 January 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Essam Halim HousseinEssam Halim Houssein
Essam Halim Houssein
MSMohammed R. Saad
Mohammed R. Saad
KHKashif Hussain
Kashif Hussain
WZWilliam Zhu
William Zhu
HSHassan Shaban
Hassan Shaban
Mahmoud HassaballahMahmoud Hassaballah
Mahmoud Hassaballah

18 September 2021 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHassan Shaban
Hassan Shaban
Essam Halim HousseinEssam Halim Houssein
Essam Halim Houssein
Marco Antonio Perez-CisnerosMarco Antonio Perez-Cisneros
Marco Antonio Perez-Cisneros
Diego OlivaDiego Oliva
Diego Oliva
AHAmir Yassin Hassan
Amir Yassin Hassan
MSmokhtar said
mokhtar said
Recently, the resources of renewable energy have been in intensive use due to their environmental and technical merits. The identification of unknown parameters in photovoltaic (PV) models is one of the main issues in simulation and modeling of renewable energy sources. Due to the random behavior of weather, the change in output current from a PV model is nonlinear. In this regard, a new optimization algorithm called Runge–Kutta optimizer (RUN) is applied for estimating the parameters of three PV models. The RUN algorithm is applied for the R.T.C France solar cell, as a case study. Moreover, the root mean square error (RMSE) between the calculated and measured current is used as the objective function for identifying solar cell parameters. The proposed RUN algorithm is superior compared with the Hunger Games Search (HGS) algorithm, the Chameleon Swarm Algorithm (CSA), the Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA), Harris Hawk’s Optimization (HHO), the Sine–Cosine Algorithm (SCA) and the Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) algorithm. Three solar cell models—single diode, double diode and triple diode solar cell models (SDSCM, DDSCM and TDSCM)—are applied to check the performance of the RUN algorithm to extract the parameters. the best RMSE from the RUN algorithm is 0.00098624, 0.00098717 and 0.000989133 for SDSCM, DDSCM and TDSCM, respectively.


2 July 2024 in Cluster Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Essam Halim HousseinEssam Halim Houssein
Essam Halim Houssein
MSMohammed R. Saad
Mohammed R. Saad
YDYoucef Djenouri
Youcef Djenouri
Gang HuGang Hu
Gang Hu
AAAbdelmgeid A. Ali
Abdelmgeid A. Ali
HSHassan Shaban
Hassan Shaban
Metaheuristic algorithms have wide applicability, particularly in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), due to their superior skill in solving and optimizing many issues in different domains. However, WSNs suffer from several issues, such as deployment, localization, sink node placement, energy efficiency, and clustering. Unfortunately, these issues negatively affect the already limited energy of the WSNs; therefore, the need to employ metaheuristic algorithms is inevitable to alleviate the harm imposed by these issues on the lifespan and performance of the network. Some associated issues regarding WSNs are modelled as single and multi-objective optimization issues. Single-objective issues have one optimal solution, and the other has multiple desirable solutions that compete, the so-called non-dominated solutions. Several optimization strategies based on metaheuristic algorithms are available to address various types of optimization concerns relating to WSN deployment, localization, sink node placement, energy efficiency, and clustering. This review reports and discusses the literature research on single and multi-objective metaheuristics and their evaluation criteria, WSN architectures and definitions, and applications of metaheuristics in WSN deployment, localization, sink node placement, energy efficiency, and clustering. It also proposes definitions for these terms and reports on some ongoing difficulties linked to these topics. Furthermore, this review outlines the open issues, challenge paths, and future trends that can be applied to metaheuristic algorithms (single and multi-objective) and WSN difficulties, as well as the significant efforts that are necessary to improve WSN efficiency.

15 September 2022 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Essam Halim HousseinEssam Halim Houssein
Essam Halim Houssein
MSMohammed R. Saad
Mohammed R. Saad
HSHassan Shaban
Hassan Shaban
HSHassan Shaban
Hassan Shaban

28 January 2025 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAbdelmgeid A. Ali
Abdelmgeid A. Ali
MHMohamed T. Hammad
Mohamed T. Hammad
HSHassan Shaban
Hassan Shaban
Brain tumors are among the deadliest diseases, leading researchers to focus on improving the accuracy of tumor classification—a critical task for prompt diagnosis and effective treatment. Recent advancements in brain tumor diagnosis have significantly increased the use of deep learning techniques, particularly pre-trained models, for classification tasks. These models serve as feature extractors or can be fine-tuned for specific tasks, reducing both training time and data requirements. However, achieving high accuracy in multi-class brain tumor classification remains a major challenge, driving continued research in this area. Key obstacles include the need for expert interpretation of deep learning model outputs and the difficulty of developing highly accurate categorization systems. Optimizing the hyperparameters of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures, especially those based on pre-trained models, plays a crucial role in improving training efficiency. Manual hyperparameter adjustment is time-consuming and often results in suboptimal outcomes. To address these challenges, we propose an advanced approach that combines transfer learning with enhanced coevolutionary algorithms. Specifically, we utilize EfficientNetB3 and DenseNet121 pre-trained models in conjunction with the Co-Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (CEGA) to classify brain tumors into four categories: gliomas, meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, and no tumors. CEGA optimizes the hyperparameters, improving both convergence speed and accuracy. Experiments conducted on a Kaggle dataset demonstrate that CEGA-EfficientNetB3 achieved the highest accuracy of 99.39%, while CEGA-DenseNet121 attained 99.01%, both without data augmentation. These results outperform cutting-edge methods, offering a rapid and reliable method for brain tumor classification. This approach has great potential to support radiologists and physicians in making timely and accurate diagnoses.