Ion Sococol

Ion Sococol


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 July 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISIon Sococol
Ion Sococol
PMPetru Mihai
Petru Mihai
TPTudor - Cristian Petrescu
Tudor - Cristian Petrescu
FNFlorin Nedeff
Florin Nedeff
VNValentin Nedeff
Valentin Nedeff
Maricel AgopMaricel Agop
Maricel Agop
In the last few decades, a series of earthquakes were recorded which pointed out several deficiencies regarding the ductile seismic response of MR RC frame structures. Thus, the research problem centres around the failure mechanisms registered by the structures, which differ from the general notions of seismic response commonly found in current design standards and norms regarding seismic actions. In these conditions, in the present paper—by using comparative methods—the analytical validation of the solution of plastic hinge concentration and seismic energy dissipation in the marginal beam areas is proposed. Therefore, the RC beam sections were reduced (weakened) in the marginal areas which exhibit a plastic deformation potential, as well as in the corner areas of concrete slabs with vertical rectangular holes. The significant outcomes of this research imply the partial “guiding” of plastic hinges in the zones adjacent to beam ends. Furthermore, a reduction of both the negative effects of horizontal rigidization of the beams and the cracking and plastic deformation effects of beam-column frame joints was observed. With these technical implications, a complex mechanism of plastic deformation of MR RC frame models is registered in which all lateral elements (including RC columns) participate in the dissipation of seismic energy, without the occurrence of the “weak storey” mechanism for any of the analytical RC frame models. Furthermore, it is possible to observe the partial formation of the global plastic mechanism “Strong Columns—Weak Beams” (SCWB) for some of the structural models. Finally, the analytically studied innovative element regarding the improvement of the seismic response of pure MR RC frame structures is successfully validated.

23 September 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISIon Sococol
Ion Sococol
PMPetru Mihai
Petru Mihai
TPTudor - Cristian Petrescu
Tudor - Cristian Petrescu
FNFlorin Nedeff
Florin Nedeff
VNValentin Nedeff
Valentin Nedeff
BLBogdan-Ionel Luca
Bogdan-Ionel Luca
In the first part of the current study, the effectiveness of the transversal cross-section reduction method for RC beams in marginal areas (by means of mechanical drilling) was validated. The said method “encourages” the formation of plastic hinges at the beam ends and, at the same time, allows for taking into account the bending stiffness of RC slabs, which is exerted upon the RC beams. In these conditions, the second part of the current research study (i.e., the current manuscript) highlights the real mode of reducing the lateral stiffness of the slabs upon the RC beams. These elements form a common body, together with the beam–column frame node. The same method as in the first part of the study—“weakening” the plates in the corner area through vertical drilling, without affecting the integrity of the reinforcing elements—was used. The analytical MR RC frame model, studied by means of the comparative method, highlights the efficiency of the transversal cross-section reduction method for RC slabs. Basically, the directing of the plastic deformations from the weakened slab areas towards the marginal areas of the reinforced concrete beams takes place. The beams rotate as far as the weakened slab areas allow its plastic deformation, thus being possible to observe the partial conservation effect of the beam–column frame joint. Furthermore, for the analytical model with the maximum number of vertical holes in the corner areas of the concrete plate, minimal plastic deformations are recorded for the marginal areas of the concrete columns. A partial conservation of the formation mechanism of the “beam-slab-frame node” common rigid block is also noted. Consequently, the dissipation of the seismic energy is made in a partially controlled and directed manner, in the “desired” areas, according to the “Strong Columns—Weak Beams” (SCWB) ductile mechanism of the lateral behavior to seismic actions for reinforced concrete frame structures. The mechanism is specified in current design norms for RC frame systems. The effectiveness of the method for reducing the transversal section of the RC plates in the corner areas by means of transversal drilling is highlighted and validated from the perspective of the local and global ductile seismic response of reinforced concrete frame structures. A significant reduction in the bending stiffness of the slabs upon the beams and a real development of the plastic hinges in the marginal areas of the beams (together with partial implications and plastic deformations) were observed.